Wikipedia Criticised by Its Co-founder
wikinerd writes "Wikipedia is under criticism by its co-founder Larry Sanger who has left the project. He warns of a possible future fork due to Wikipedia's Anti-Elitism and he presents his view on Wikipedia's (lack of) reliability. New wikis on various subjects have already emerged, with some of them being complete forks of Wikipedia. Critical articles on Wikipedia are also being published by other sources."
Who are those "reputable organisations" and why is something not true when there aren't any "reputable organisations" claiming it? Are they better than online resources? Do you mean reputable organisations like television, which is of course totally unbiased?
/ irq-08 1204/eng/
And what about those photos at http://www.aztlan.net/iraqi_women_raped.htm ? Oh, of course those are just faked by organisations full of entrenched fanatics...
Is Amnesty International reputable enough for you?
http://www.amnesty.org/resources/videostory