RIAA Loses DMCA Subpoena Case Against Charter
BrynM writes "According to an opinion published today (PDF), the RIAA has lost its case against Charter Communications regarding subpoenas for the cable ISP's users to be identified for copyright infringement in the Eastern District of Missouri. You may remember that Charter Communications filed a motion to block the RIAA's subpoena back in late 2003. Now Charter has prevailed. Here's the blurb from the Court 'Civil case - Digital Millennium Copyright Act. District court erred in issuing subpoenas on internet providers to obtain personal information about the providers' subscribers who were alleged to be transmitting copyrighted works via the internet through peer-to-peer programs; the internet providers' function was limited to acting as a conduit for the allegedly copyrighted material, and Section 512(h) of the Act does not authorize subpoenas in such circumstances; case remanded with directions. Dissent by Judge Murphy. [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Murphy and Bright, Circuit Judges]'"
The problem is not Chinese laws. The problem is Chinese culture. A Chinese does not care about privacy for anyone except himself.
Notice the lack of Chinese immigrants in the membership of the American Civil Liberties Union or Amnesty International. You tell me what is "going down" here.
If you ever see any muslims or arabs in america, do your country a favor and shoot to kill! None of them are innocent!
*wishes for more tsunamis to occur*
Now I guess they will just be using the USA PATRIOT Act to go after copyright infringers. Labeling them as enemy combatants. And sending them to Guantanamo Bay Cuba for secret military trials. And some people thought civil libertarians were just crying wolf.
The fourth amendment doesn't grant individuals the right to commit crimes anonymously.
your right
"you're".
the constitution nor the bill of rights don't say anything
"The Constitution and the Bill of Rights don't say anything" or "Neither the Constitution nor the Bill of Rights say anything".
since you brought up the constitution
"Constitution" (capitalized).
one thing it does say, is that copyright is to last *17* years.
No, it says that it is to last for a "limited time".
is the *PEOPLES* main benefit
"<b>people's</b>".
much worse then stealing
"than".
copied a cd to a tape
have a cd player
converted a cd
"CD" (upper-case).
CD's, DVD's,
"CDs, DVDs".