Slashdot Mirror


What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

An anonymous reader writes "That's what online magazine The Edge - the World Question Center asked over 120 scientists, futurists, and other interesting minds. Their answers are sometimes short and to the point (Bruce Sterling: 'We're in for climatic mayhem'), often long and involved; they cover everything from the existence of God to the nature of black holes. What do you believe, even though you can't prove it?"

12 of 2,353 comments (clear)

  1. I believe by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    in intelligent design.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  2. Truth... by ites · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... is just a tool for navigating a complex world.

    In some cultures, sacrificing a goat to the spirits is a truth that may help you survive the famine, if only by making your neighbours afraid enough of you so you can steal their food.

    In other cultures, knowing why the ride to work drives you crazy is a truth that helps you stay sane.

    Truth is any tool that works better. Scientific truth - that is, truth derived by the scientific method - works best of all, because it fits the physical world so well.

    Different truths can be in direct conflict (quantum vs. classical mechanics) and yet both be suitable tools.

    Even religion is a truth that helps navigate certain kinds of reality... it's a kind of fuse box for the mind, so to speak. When logic and science can't explain why the wave hit you, perhaps religion can.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  3. That there is no god. by azav · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Simply put. As children, we grow up with "all knowing parental figures." With that as precident, when we grow up, we look for that figure. Therefore it is understandable and expected that humanity seek some type of all knowing figure to explain all they don not know and give them comfort when they are grown.

    We as humans look for a god, even though based upon complex systems and greater scarcity of complex working systems as the systems become more complex, it is unlikely that one exists.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  4. P != NP by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish I could prove it, but it seems to me that it is unlikely that P == NP.

    There are various points of discontinuity in mathematics and I think this is one of them (for example, we know that the number of integers is less than the number of reals and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_hypothesis) .

    John.

  5. I believe in 2 things I can't prove by AceCaseOR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    God and that Global Warming is not necessarily a bad thing.

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  6. Re:i don't know what i really beleive by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i don't beleive in the christian god, but i know there has to be something out there, things are just to "perfect" to randomly appear.

    I think what you meant to say was:

    "i don't beleive in the christian god, but i WANT there has to be something out there, things are just to "perfect" to randomly appear.

    Are things "too perfect" because the earth and the universe was built around us and our design or are they "too perfect" because we eveloved to fit "perfectly" into this universe, that if the universe was different, we would be different also and wondering the same thoughts.

    Just thought you might want to consider these things along with a healthy dose of Occam's Razor...

    --
    Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
  7. OK, my turn to reply by TrevorB · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I believe that the existentialists are wrong, and that the world and the universe do indeed exist even if I can't prove it.

    After all, if the observable world didn't exist, what the hell, the concept of truth itself is questionable, you might as well believe whatever you want.

    Everything else is suspect.

    I kinda like theories that don't falter under repeated experiments. Scientific method and all that. It's a good thing.

  8. Re:Nature journal proved 93% of scientists ATHEIST by efatapo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While researchers views might be that depressing, the beliefs of medical doctors is quite encouraging. Take a look at this survey.

    72% believe that religion provides a reliable and necessary guide to life.
    58% attend church once a month.
    58% believe the Bible was inspired by God.

    So while your article implies intelligent and influential scientists don't believe in God, a number I personally hope to decrease, the study of medical doctors shows a strong number of people with faith. I would say that medical doctors have 'scientific minds', which would dispute your second to last line.

    On a related note, I don't think that it's fair to use the National Academy of Science as the survey pool. People who have made it into the NAS have devoted at least 90% of their waking energy to the scientific fields are not consistent with most kinds of faith anyways. As a Christian, there are things more important to me than scientific success. I have had dinner with many biochemists in the academy and family/friends/life/etc comes a distant second to their career. So I would suggest that these results are completely consistent with their life style. I would like to see a survey of PhD scientists or professors at a variety of universities, those results would be much more of a mixed bag.

    I also hope that you don't take this as confirmation that education and faith are not compatible. I know plenty of PhD students who are practicing Christians.

    ~Dan

  9. Many Worlds Interpretation I believe in by thomasa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    QUOTE
    The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is an approach to quantum mechanics according to which, in addition to the world we are aware of directly, there are many other similar worlds which exist in parallel at the same space and time. The existence of the other worlds makes it possible to remove randomness and action at a distance from quantum theory and thus from all physics.
    UNQUOTE

    This gives new meaning to the concept of re-incarnation.

  10. A simple universe by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That the universe is understandable by man, and furthermore that its fundamental principles, when properly formulated, are conceptually simple.

  11. Re:A Consistent Universe and Other People by rossifer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But they still are clearly not you, so why should you care?

    Good followup, but now you're asking a question of morality, as opposed to the reasoning behind a metaphysical predicate.

    Short answer: because it's normal (genetically wired into my brain) to treat other people with respect.

    Longer answer (and a better answer for people who don't believe in natural causes of behavior): Because there are substantial negative consequences to behaving in a way that ignores other people's value. I enjoy the company of friends (and find their help useful on occasion), and other people are good at detecting fake friends. I like my freedom, and running people down at stoplights causes uniformed people in cars with flashing lights to lock me up, limiting my freedom.

    Regards,
    Ross

  12. Re:Someday by Wraithlyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The Big Bang theory isn't about beliefs as you seem to use the word. It's about the best explanation that fits the evidence."

    It is perhaps the best CURRENT explanation. But it is not as good a theory as it was even a few years ago. There are questions that the Big Bang theory has no explanation for.

    For example, as recently as 1998 it was discovered that the universe is "flat". A tiny difference in the density of the universe, either up or down, would make it curved. This means the Big Bang was "tuned" to produce exactly this density. The odds of that happening by chance are estimated at 1 to 10^50.

    The Big Bang does not explain the increasing evidence that the expansion of the universe is actually accelerating .

    The Big Bang theory does not adequately explain (IMHO) the "Horizon Problem", which is that the universe looks uniform in all directions, from galaxy evolution to background radiation. (Yes, I am aware of "Inflation Theory", which seeks to address the Horizon Problem, but it's pretty shaky. Here's a paper disputing the ability of the inflationary model to produce homogenous CMBR if you are interested.)

    Dead-Tree References:
    "The Field", Lynne McTaggart - Recommended for everyone, written for laymen.
    "Science and the Akashic Field", Ervin Laszlo - This is a bit more technical.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson