Slashdot Mirror


Producing a Quiz Show from Multiple Locations?

Bloke in a box asks: "One of the pubs I help manage is putting on a quiz show. The landlady's two sisters also run pubs, so we have decided to do this quiz for charity (for the Tsunami disaster). At the moment I have: three pubs, three webcams, two laptops, a desktop, three microphones, three sets of 512kb broadband, three big screens, three projectors and one willing quizmaster. I'm aware of various remote admin software which will aid with this, but I'm wondering if there is conferencing software that might be a better fit for this, since I'd need the ability to control the communications between the pubs (like when questions need to be repeated, and so forth)." What other pieces of software would you recommend for such a production?

11 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. 512kbit? by lordkuri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're going to attempt to stream 3 separate video and audio streams over a 512kbit link?

    I think you need to look into more bandwidth, that's quite a low amount and I think you're going to see some issues from it.

  2. Well... by grub · · Score: 3, Insightful


    It sounds like you've got a blank slate and aren't sure where to start doodling plans. Make sure you test the system thoroughly and keep cell phones for when the system bombs.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. Maybe not enough bandwidth? by digitalamish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe think a little smaller. Instead of full video conferencing, perhaps use text and audio, sort of like the old "You don't know Jack" site. Use an IM client as the method of 'buzzing in', post the questions on the screens as you read it, then allow the user to speak a reply. As a fallback, make sure people at each location have the questions and answers in case there's tech problems, and to verify the answers in case 'shenanagans' are called. If you have the spare bandwidth, then maybe you can snap a picture every 5 seconds and post it. Best not to overthink it, save those braincells for the questions, and the beer!

  4. buzz in by Icyfire0573 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if you have buzzers that lock out other people when you buzz in your gonna have to deal with the latency times for it to lock the others out

    1. Re:buzz in by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Sync the clocks with NTP and have the first click win. A small delay while the machines poll each other wouldn't be out of order.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  5. Lag anyone? by shidarin'ou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think this would make a quiz show, running on a 512k line, almost impossible. You'd never be able to tell who really buzzed in first- worse, every location would have a different "first" buzzer and there'd be no way to tell who was ACTUALLY first.. unless you did somethin wild like sync timecodes at the source and after every buzz use instant sync tape relay to figure out who REALLY buzzed in first...

  6. NTN? by ewanrg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Considering you're looking at doing this for charity, have you considered contacting the folks at NTN who do this all the time and see if they'd be willing to set you up for a special occasion?


    Just a thought...

  7. Yahoo IM might work by coordinatezero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You haven't explained the quiz-show setup. Where is the quizmaster? How are you asking questions and how are contestants answering? In a pinch: Use Yahoo Messenger for the video links and then create a Yahoo chatroom and turn on the voice-chat. Use VNC to control the remote machines; if you have three pubs, I would suggest getting another machine to handle the VNC'ing, and just leave all the others hooked up. Pub1 views Pub2 and Pub3, Pub2 views Pub1 and Pub3, Pub3 views Pub1 and Pub2 --- and they're all in the same voice-chat. Is it oh-so-hacker cool? No. Is it free and will it work? Yes.

  8. Why not simplify it? by Night+Goat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the summary, it looks like this is going to be a one-time thing, a charity event with the proceeds going to tsunami relief. Rather than spend all this time and money trying to set up a technological way to do this, why not just get three quizmasters with three PA systems? You'd have less expenses, so more money would go to charity. I'm assuming you are getting volunteers to run the quizzes, so I didn't figure in costs for paying the extra people.
    Another thing I worry about is, if you're only doing it once, you can count on stuff going wrong. Things always do with something this complicated. I could see if you were going to do it week after week, because after a few weeks you'd get the hang of it and you could streamline the process. But if you're just planning on doing a one-shot event, stick to the tried and true. You could rent three PA rigs for the evening and be good to go. Hope this helps.

  9. Re:PHP by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although you may not be a fan, keeping things simple and not re-inventing the wheel might help. You should consider contacting a company like WebEx which provides great application sharing/conferencing services to many companies, and explain what you're doing and why. It might be a great idea for them to participate (good publicity, maybe they'll have a press release) and get more attention for your event and ultimately raising money. If they donate their services you acknowledge them as a sponsor, etc.

  10. Recommendation by avronius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I recommend a slight change in overall scope:

    Each location has it's own 'contest', with the computer providing a results display of each of the 3 seperate matches. Some form of bar chart could be kept 'live' showing the results for each pub.

    You could 'film' 30-second interviews of the contestants, between questions, and play them back during "intermission" periods.

    This way each of the pubs is competeing for an ultimate score, highest scoring pub/player = 1st place, etc.

    This eliminates the majority of the concerns around latency, and provides a more effective use of the equipment at hand.