Slashdot Mirror


For Sale: Biosphere 2

jangobongo writes "The Texas company that built and owns the Biosphere 2 Center near Tucson, AZ has put the property up for sale. Built at a cost of over $200 million, Biosphere 2 was originally used as a a self-sustaining environment for humans with eight "biospherians" sealing themselves in for two years to see if they could survive without outside intervention. The Biosphere 2 campus consists of a 3.1-acre glass terrarium and 70 other buildings on 140 acres, and includes offices, classrooms, laboratories, residential housing, and a hotel and conference center. Because it is a very expensive place to operate, the more than 85,000 visitors last year were not enough to make money on tourism alone. Potential uses for the property: a religious college, spa, golf resort or even a technology park."

54 comments

  1. Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And if you can't afford that, how about subleasing my 1-bedroom in Sheepshead Bay in Brooklyn for $750 a month?

    1. Re:Slashvertisement by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      $750 in Brooklyn? Hmmmmmm.....

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  2. did it ever actually work? by oni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did they ever actually manage to live in the thing without outside support in the form of O2 and food?

    1. Re:did it ever actually work? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't remember if it was BioSphere I or II, but one of them had the concrete leech most of the oxygen out of the air. They eventually had to shut it down way ahead of schedule because they couldn't compensate for the lack of oxygen. Wusses. They probaboly just needed Pauly Shore.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:did it ever actually work? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um...isn't Biosphere I the Earth?

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:did it ever actually work? by Arngautr · · Score: 1

      Yes, mostly. Though they had problems with O2->concrete in the first trial, this was solved on a later trial as I recall. Also it is believed that they smuggled some medical supplies in at one point.

    4. Re:did it ever actually work? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      Could be. I'm going off of memory here, but I believe that they did a small one first, and then the larger more expansive one. That being said, I think we can all agree that concrete leeching the Earth's oxygen supply would also suck;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    5. Re:did it ever actually work? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just going off memory, too. I'm sure that, back when they built it, I heard it mentioned somewhere that the "II" in the name was because they named it after the original biosphere (the Earth). Then again, I could be full of it.

      I wouldn't worry, there's an awful lot of oxygen out there...

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    6. Re:did it ever actually work? by Somegeek · · Score: 3, Informative
      It wasn't a matter of oxygen being absorbed by concrete, it was a matter of oxygen being consumed by microbes, which gave off carbon dioxide. The researchers couldn't find excess CO2, so they didn't think that the microbes were the culprits behind the missing oxygen. It turned out that the concrete was absorbing the extra CO2 and thus hiding the evidence pointing to the microbes as the true cause of the missing oxygen.

      "microbes were using oxygen to metabolize the excess organic matter that had been added to the agricultural, savanna, and rain forest soils to encourage plant growth."

      This info comes from the following link that was included at the end of the Wikipedia article:

      http://www.chemistry.org/portal/a/c/s/1/acsdisplay .html?DOC=vc2%2F2my%2Fmy2_biosphere.html

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    7. Re:did it ever actually work? by Arngautr · · Score: 1

      Interesting, Yeah what I learned of it was mostly from my environmental sciences class 9 years ago, thanks for the correction.

    8. Re:did it ever actually work? by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I believe you are correct. I visited it a few years ago and that is what I recall them saying (that Biosphere I is earth).

    9. Re:did it ever actually work? by mmynsted · · Score: 1

      Correct. That is the whole point of the name Biosphere II.

      It is a replica for the original biosphere, our planet. The name could have been better. Biodome or Biosphere come to mind as better names.

      It is not like people would look at it and say, "Hmmm. It is named 'Biosphere' so it must be our entire planet. Strange that it looks man made. Hmmm, if that is our entire planet, where am I standing?"

    10. Re:did it ever actually work? by famebait · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a matter of oxygen being absorbed by concrete [...] It turned out that the concrete was absorbing the extra CO2

      Last I heard, the "O" in "CO2" stands for oxygen.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    11. Re:did it ever actually work? by Somegeek · · Score: 1
      Last I heard, the "O" in "CO2" stands for oxygen.

      OK, IANAC, but I will take a stab at that in case you're serious.

      Yes the O does stand for oxygen, but that doesn't matter. For example, just becuase there is oxygen in carbon dioxide doesn't mean that you can breath pure CO2 and live. Read the link I posted; the chemical reaction with the concrete only happens with CO2, not with pure O2. Concrete does not absorb O2, only CO2.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    12. Re:did it ever actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biosphere I is the planet Earth.

    13. Re:did it ever actually work? by famebait · · Score: 1

      Yes the O does stand for oxygen, but that doesn't matter. For example, just becuase there is oxygen in carbon dioxide doesn't mean that you can breath pure CO2 and live

      We all know that. So what? When absorbed into the the O and C are incorporated into yet other compounds. It doesn't matter which form they are in, the point is that oxygen atoms are removed from the system, and no longer available for the normal oxygen cycle of the ecosystem.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
  3. No way... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm holding out for my own airship hangar.

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  4. Potential uses by TheRoachMan · · Score: 1

    "Potential uses for the property: a religious college, spa, golf resort or even a technology park."

    Falls under the category of 'religious college' perhaps, but how about a sect HQ? Hare Krishna, Scientology, Wu Manchu, The Stonecutters Lodge, etc. Funding is also not a problem. Most big sects already have enough ties with big industials, criminal syndicats and Hollywood stars to get their hands on enough money to buy the Biosphere.

    Or what about evil masterminds? Doctor Papa could finally get a pied-a-terre in the USA!

    1. Re:Potential uses by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      I went to Googleand did some searches for pictures of it. Unless there are extensive underground networks carved into the bedrock under the facility, I don't see anything worthy of a headquarters that I would use. I mean, just WHERE am I going to keep the sharks? Nothing in these pictures looks even remotely laser-proof, and I don't even want to think of the mess I'll have to sweep up when the special forces attack.

    2. Re:Potential uses by snooo53 · · Score: 1
      An interesting bit of trivia; from the beginning Ed Bass and the management were accused of being part of a survivalist cult inspired by John Allen (interview), who ran a theater commune in the southwest. Alegedly, this cult was running the show along with the 'official' management; accused of caring more about colonizing mars and putting on a good show, than running a serious study. One aspect of this was in the design, that tower contained a library, at the top because learning is the highest and most noble pursuit of man. During the experiments, when oxygen levels started falling, none of the air-starved and overworked biospherians apparently had the energy to climb up there. Tensions rose, the group split into factions, became tight-lipped and defensive... later ending up suing Space Biosphere Ventures.

      So in a sense, it's already been a cult headquarters of sorts. I don't suppose a 'cult' of today could do any worse... who knows, they might actually improve the place, try to use it for it's orignal purpose again, rather than a mishmash of mini research projects.

      The location is great for a cult. Right next to the mountains, outside a small town, by open pit mines. With all the researcher housing, the hotel and the visitor centers, if they decided to close it off, they'd have everything they needed to run a small town

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  5. Idea by Rie+Beam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just realized something:

    Millionaire + Self-Sustained Environment = Human Hunting Adventure

    This is gonna be fun.

    1. Re:Idea by rsadelle · · Score: 1

      You're confusing Pauly Shore with John Leguizamo.

    2. Re:Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I represent the FOX Broadcasting Corp., I'd like to buy your idea!

      -Rupert

  6. A prison camp totally isolated from the world? by orthogonal · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Potential uses for the property: a religious college, spa, golf resort or even a technology park."

    Or warehousing, for life "enemy combatants" you don't have the evidence to convict, but can't release because they'll hate you forever for torturing them.

    What better for that then a Biosphere literally hermetically sealed from the rest of the world. Perhaps it's even sealed tightly enough to hold in the shame Americans should feel for what's being perpetuated in their names.

    Yes, I'm proud to be an American: after getting to the moon in 1969, 35 years later the closest we've come to a manned landing on Mars is a "Biosphere" in the Arizona desert. Meanwhile, "land of the free" is using medieval tortures on innocent men and proposing to jail them for life without any evidence.

    Here's to you, Mr. Jefferson! Here's to you Mr. Adams!

    This is not the future I dreamt of.

  7. I took that tour a few years ago... by aoasus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It consisted largely of,

    Here's our failed experiment, let's walk around it.
    No you can't go in.

    But you can go in our GIFT SHOP!

    At the time I'm pretty sure there were some college still woring with (read: Funding) the folks there as there aren't too many other places like it on the planet for that kind of biological research. Maybe they ought to seal the thing up & forget about it for a few milennia. Maybe something will evolve its way out.

  8. Railians? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I think it might just be ideal for the Railians...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  9. Reality Show by peu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It failed because reality shows didn't exist at the time.

    If done today, I'm sure its a smash hit, think of a mix of big brother + truman show.

    1. Re:Reality Show by elmegil · · Score: 1

      Better buy up the property as an investment then! And you forgot the self-sustaining == Survivor aspect....

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:Reality Show by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Blast it off into space and make art into reality (sort of). Sadly this film is not replayed on Space, Scream or DriveInClassics yet. As an aside, I've heard that Scream was moving into the states - any news on this? Jane Meikle is great and Scream has a funny "expose" on her real life.

  10. Self sustaining. by Spudley · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it was really self sustaining, it wouldn't be expensive to operate. :-/

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:Self sustaining. by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      that's what i was thinking. other than maybe washing the windows once in awhile, where does all of this maintenance expense come from?

    2. Re:Self sustaining. by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      All the supporting infrastructure that _isn't_ self-sustaining (misc buildings, advertising, taxes, employee wages, etc).

  11. An Idea by Rie+Beam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would it be possible to convert it into a location to house fragile or endangered plants and certain animals? I mean, if they can solve that oxygen problem, that is.

    1. Re:An Idea by gotih · · Score: 1

      hehe, plants don't need O2 -- we can grow weed in there!

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    2. Re:An Idea by snooo53 · · Score: 1
      An interesting idea, but that probably wouldn't be feasable. Part of the big problem with the whole experiment is the balance of species in such a small environment really didn't work out well. So if you were trying to recreate a certain biome specific to an endangered species, they'll probably end up doing worse than they would adapting in their native habitat. If you were just creating managed isolated living for certain animals, well, you might as well just build sealed containers in a regular zoo.

      The only type of animal I think would do well in there would be a mix of bird species. It's certainly big and tall enough to give them lots of room to fly around. The structure just looks like a big aviary on the inside. The problem maintaining the balance of insects for them to feed on (or to pollinate plants). The glass naturally blocks UV light, the lack of which orginally killed all the bees in the experiments there. If you were able to figure out a way around that, I think they might be small enough to do well in a biome like that with minimal intervention. But again, if you're going for the zoo sanctuary rather than recreating a biome, it'd probably be easier and cheaper to build your own

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    3. Re:An Idea by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Oxygen problem takes care of itself once the concrete is full cured (usually takes a few years, but then Biosphere 2 is no spring chicken...)

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  12. I took that tour three months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Previously (before September 2003), Columbia University was managing Biosphere 2 and they were using it mainly for research and as a study-abroad program for students. The tourism was aspect was a sideline and you probably couldn't go inside because it would have messed up thier research and learning aspects.

    Now you can go inside on the extended tour which lasts 2-3 hours. While I was there, I got to see all the internal areas except one, the "tropical jungle" section of the terrarium, which was completely overgrown because the environment inside was so agreeable with the plants, they just grew like crazy and took over. Our tour got to see the living quarters and the research labs. We went into the terrariums to see the two food garden areas, the section with the "ocean", "savannah", "marsh", and "desert" biomes. We toured under the facility in the basement to see the mechanical aspects, power plant, water recycling, and air handlers. They also took us into one of the two "lungs" of the biosphere, which are a technological feat of engineering designed to accommodate for the expansion and contraction of the internal air as it heats up and cools down.

    I came away from the tour very impressed with all the details and a new respect of the whole project, as well as for the eight participants in the 2-year experiment.

    This was by no means a "failed experiment", rather a very large learning experiment.

  13. Columbia U has a big investment in this. by Bill+Walker · · Score: 1
    When I was at Columbia (2 years ago), they used to offer semesters in the Biosphere for astronomy and I think eco-studies. here's an article about it.

    You'd think they'd be pretty pissed given the money they've put into it. Dollars to doughnuts the University they mentioned talking to in the article is Columbia.

    --
    Please, for the love of God, no more car analogies.
  14. Not ended ahead of schedule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "They eventually had to shut it down way ahead of schedule because they couldn't compensate for the lack of oxygen."

    That is an incorrect statement. There were actually two different "missions" where people were sealed in: the first from September 26, 1991, to September 26, 1993, and the second for six months in 1994. Neither mission was ended prematurely.

    They did have an oxygen problem and had to correct it by adding pure oxygen to the environment when oxygen levels dropped too low, though.

    1. Re:Not ended ahead of schedule... by barawn · · Score: 1

      They did have an oxygen problem and had to correct it by adding pure oxygen to the environment when oxygen levels dropped too low, though.

      The mission was to have humans live in a sealed environment. They unsealed it. Therefore, didn't the mission end early, whether or not they claim it did?

  15. There was a reality show of it. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    There was a reality show of it right afterwards. It was called Biodome. I think Pauly Shore won....

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:There was a reality show of it. by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      There was a reality show of it right afterwards. It was called Biodome. I think Pauly Shore won....

      Yes, almost by definition he won. Because everyone else loses with Pauly Shore movies.

  16. For Sale: Biosphere 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So close, yet so far away...

  17. I know how to make it self-sustaining... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    Why don't they just seal up the place with a whole bunch of stuff inside, and see what survives? That would be a pretty amazing experiement! Then, when we see something thriving, we introduce some interesting thing that feeds on it, and then see where the new equilibrium is. Maybe we'd eventually find something inside that humans can live on, and we could re-do the experiment and do it right.

    Now that the thing is built and we have time, let's not micromanage the biosphere and just let it live. I think that studying how big but closed systems come to equilibrium would be more useful than the intitial experiment itself. The original idea was that this sort of thing might eventually be built on Mars, and we should first test in on Earth. Well, if we do that, here is how I think it should be done.

    Not: Make guesses about how things will grow and interact, and engineer a system based on those guesses, hoping that it supports human habitation. (That's how the original failed experiment went.)

    Instead: Send up a bunch of stuff that we're most confident about, some plants which are hardy and make a good base for a food chain. Have some unmanned "gardner" robots inside that do a bit of interfering, but mostly, let natural selection decide what does and doesn't grow. Once you see what grows best, introduce organisms that are progressively higher on the food chain. Only once we got stuff growing reliably should we send people there.

    So you might be thinking that it will take a long time before a biosphere on Mars is ready for this... And I agree! That's why we should do some dry runs in Biosphere 2. It sucks that it gets so much hot sunlight, because on Mars, it will be a lot cooler and dimmer. Still, we'd learn some strategies, and a bunch of other stuff.

    1. Re:I know how to make it self-sustaining... by rlanctot · · Score: 2, Funny

      ..."Why don't they just seal up the place with a whole bunch of stuff inside, and see what survives?"

      The little green men have already been there and done that. So far Homo Sapiens are leading, but they have a nasty tendency to wipe themselves out. We're cheering for the dolphins, they're a 2:1 lock.

    2. Re:I know how to make it self-sustaining... by mattspammail · · Score: 1
      Instead: Send up a bunch of stuff that we're most confident about, some plants which are hardy and make a good base for a food chain.

      Don't forget to make it realistic. Nothing that survives in that environment is necessarily going to help us. First, make sure that you pump in a healthy dose of pollutants. Whatever lives (and is not toxic) under those circumstances would be helpful.

      Possible "bunch of stuff" list items to include:

      Lead bar shavings (in the water supply)

      Motor oil (also in the water supply)

      candy bars (for whatever does survive to then get themselves fat with.)

      A couple of bacteria that qualify as "superbugs" (antibiotic-resistant)

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
  18. I actually lived there! by snooo53 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The parent AC has a good summary.

    I was fortunate enough to get to do research there in 2001. The place is absolutely amazing. We didn't actually live inside the Biosphere, there's a trailer/kit house village down past the lungs. The researchers there are literally from all over the globe.

    As for the areas you didn't see on the tour, there isn't much to see in the coastal desert, and all of it is visible if you walk around the outside. The agricultural biome was partitioned off into 3 managed forests, since they are not needed for food production. At the time I was there they were ramping up each to different levels of CO2 to see what effect that had (which I guess simulates what would happen if CO2 levels rose significantly on the earth).

    The tropical rainforest is sealed off from the tour areas, since that's where the bulk of the 'research' takes place. At the time, we were only allowed to go in twice to check on our experiment, which was a good thing IMO. There's a 'mountain' inside with fans at the top to help air circulate, and yes, the vegetation is very dense, so it is hard to see from the outside. I don't think any significantly sized animals live there anymore. In fact, when they had the first experiment there they had a problem with these primates (I believe they were galagos?) that would climb up the scaffolding in the rainforest biome, slip, and fall to their deaths right next to the outside windows. Of course, the PR people and the tour groups were not impressed when they would see all these dead 'monkeys' pressed up against the glass. So they had to go. I think the only larger animals that did remarkably well were in the oceans.

    The AC is right when they say this was a very large "learning experiment" rather than a failed one. Even though they had many problems, they were handled in a controlled way and accounted for in the experiment and the data they took. If anything, the problems helped them learn more, since those are the types of unexpected things colonists in space will deal with.

    This site has some good photos of the different biomes and the living/mechanical areas. If anyone has any questions or wants to know more of the 'unofficial history' let me know and I'll try to field them

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    1. Re:I actually lived there! by Comrade64 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like we need to gather up a few Norns, and a Grendel and throw them inside for a year.

      --
      If you are reading this, then you are one of those people whom I just can't take seriously.
  19. Screw that... by austad · · Score: 1

    Someone should buy it and start a cult in it. Amass a huge fortune like Aum did, but then take the money and run, leaving the cult members to fend for themselves when they run out of oxygen or cut their fingers off in the rice machine.

    Or, it could serve as an evil lair. You'd have to move it inside a volcano, but still, it would be sweet.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  20. So How much $$ by s7726 · · Score: 0

    I want to buy it! I could do all sorts a cool shit with a place like that. I need to moveout of the house soon anyway.

  21. sad golf course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda tough to get any sort of decent golf course on 140 acres -- perhaps you could get a 9 hole executive course in.

  22. Where Earth's O2 comes from by Latent+Heat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I suppose there could be two aspects to the Biosphere II experiment. One is to understand in microcosm how life allows Earth to have an atmosphere with 21 percent O2. The other is to develop a self-sustaining ecology to provide food and oxygen for a space colony or a Mars expedition.

    Nick Lane's book Oxygen argues that the Earth's oxygen is not a tightly-regulated homeostatic system -- the old saw about the Amazon being the lungs of the Earth. The oxygen in the atmosphere is the result of the small excess of carbon fixed by plants that doesn't get consumed or decayed by animals and bacteria, with volcanoes supplying the makeup CO2 to drive the process. Just as the fossil fuels are the relic of this process, O2 is the fossil gas relic of the process. The only reason we are not burning up all the oxygen by burning coal is that most fossil fuel is very low grade shales and sandstones while coal, gas, and oil are only a small quantity of concentrated carbon.

    The claim is that contrary to the Gaia Hypothesis which would argue for tighter homeostatic control of O2 and other gasses, O2 reached 35 percent during the Age of Coal (Carboniforous) while some tens of millions of years later in the Permian, O2 crashed to 15 percent. Scientists are supposed to know this from isotope ratios in rocks from those strata.

    So the Earth is a poor model for a closed ecological system in that the processes controlling O2 operate over geologic time and are perhaps less tightly regulated than once thought.

  23. BIOS-3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Following those links, I stumbled upon BIOS-3, in Siberia, which seemed an entirely more realistic attempt at finding out what it takes to make an enclosed system containing humans. Far less space, far less cost, much more rapid turnover of matter, and they report exactly what limits they're running up against. Sometimes I think the Americans should give up and just fund the Russians, who seem more practical.

  24. Satelite image of property by ekeup1 · · Score: 1