Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Releases AntiSpyware Program

Nathan Weinberg writes "Microsoft released this morning Microsoft AntiSpyware, the product of last month's acquisition of GIANT. As I write in my report on my site, the program is very powerful, and certainly measures up to and may even beat Spybot and Ad-Aware. However, it's also pretty buggy, and Microsoft might have already sneaked in a pay subscription service."

7 of 580 comments (clear)

  1. NAV by mirko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just had NAV2005 installed on a friend's infected PC and it did Virus and Spywares at the same time. This and Ad-Aware seems a good solution which I'd trust more than any Microsoft "security" stuff.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  2. What - no support for WinME ?!?? by uid100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Shocking - they don't seem to support DOS based Windows (9x and ME) even though there are arguably millions of infected consumper PC's. WinME boxes aren't THAT old.

    I do understand not supporting NT4 tho..

    --
    ...yup...
  3. Re:Lots of info left out of the summary... by Sentry21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And without giving too much away, the GenuineCheck program that it offers for download (if you're not using IE) doesn't really do its job. I mean, I DO have a licensed Windows product key, I just didn't use it for this install. Still, it didn't seem to pick up on that.

    Or maybe the goons are on their way as we speak. Who knows.

  4. I've just been told... by wcitechnologies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    by Microsoft AntiSpyware that I have spyware called RealVNC on my computer! I notice it says NOTHING about spyware called Microsoft Remote Desktop. I know lots of people out here use VNC, for goodness sakes, its SPYWARE now?! wtf

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
  5. Re:Lots of info left out of the summary... by karmaflux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The probably saw this:

    2. TIME-SENSITIVE SOFTWARE. The software will stop running on July 31, 2005. You may not receive any other notice. You will not receive any further updates when the software stops running.

    and figured OMG SUBSCRIPTION!

    Another interesting EULA box is the actual definition of the software's function:

    4. POTENTIALLY UNWANTED SOFTWARE. The software will search your computer for "spyware," "adware" and other potentially unwanted software ("Potentially Unwanted Software"). If it finds Potentially Unwanted Software, the software will ask you if you want to ignore, disable (quarantine) or remove it. The software will only remove or disable Potentially Unwanted Software as you instruct it. Removing or disabling the Potentially Unwanted Software may cause other software on your computer to stop working, and it may cause you to breach a license to use other software on your computer, if the other software installed the Potentially Unwanted Software on your computer as a condition of your use of the other software. You should read the license agreements for other software before authorizing the removal of any Potentially Unwanted Software. By using this software, it is possible that you will also remove or disable software that is not Potentially Unwanted Software. You are solely responsible for selecting which Potentially Unwanted Software the software removes or disables.

    When I worked at Dell, they wouldn't let us dick with spyware stuff because of potential legal problems -- that is, the law might side with the malware.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  6. Re:Lots of info left out of the summary... by neuroticia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting question. Is a company that releases an inferior product, but that has a monopoly required to force their customers to pay subscription fees for multiple software packages by third parties needed to patch the vulnurability? And if they decide to release their own software to fix the problem, are they partaking in anti-competitive practices by wiping out companies that exist solely to patch the problem? If they charge a competitive fee for the software, is that better or worse than giving it out for free? On one hand they're screwing their customers who live with the bugs, on the other hand they're putting companies out of business.

  7. Re:Lots of info left out of the summary... by Thing+1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Hmm, you just gave me an idea for the next vector of infection: a virus which changes your Registry's idea of the license number to a known hacked one, thereby preventing future Service Packs from being able to be installed (and also increase a business' chances of an audit by teh SPA).

    Hopefully that can be protected against, too... I'm not sure how it's configured in the Registry, perhaps they already encrypt it, but if XP can decrypt it to verify, then someone can debug while it does so...

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.