Slashdot Mirror


New DRM Scheme To Make Current DVD Players Obsolete

Oneflower writes "ExtremeTech reports that a proposed new DRM scheme could make current DVD players obsolete. The scheme, from Hewlett-Packard and Philips, targets DVD+R and DVD+RW and is an attempt to enforce the FCC broadcast flag on DVD recorders."

8 of 544 comments (clear)

  1. Even if that worked... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not like I can't just stop watching DVDs.

    There's a threshold to just how much crap people will put up with it. Mine and some fellow geeks may have lower thresholds, but eventually the public threshold will be met as well and the companies that keep pulling these silly stunts will get a thrashing in the form of competition that treats customers like customers, not like crooks.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  2. If the eye can see it, or the ear can hear it.... by SirFozzie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It can be recorded/copied.

    When are they going to learn?

    --
    People Talking in Movie shows.. people smoking in bed.. people voting republican.. GIVE THEM A BOOT TO THE HEAD!
  3. I'm confused. by afstanton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why exactly would I buy DVDs that I can't play on my existing DVD player? Oh yeah, in a few years they simply won't make DVDs that do play on my existing player.

    --
    Reject Fear - Embrace Hope
  4. Well, I'm fine with it... by Xugumad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...I'll go along with their shiny new DRM standard, if they'll replace my DVD player for free. By which I mean, pick it up from my door, and give me an equivalent player with the DRM, for absolutely no cost to myself.

    However, I bought a DVD player, and if it stops playing DVDs for no good reason, I'm not going to be enthusiastic about buying another...

  5. Re:Oh the irony by nightsweat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Horseshit.

    The media companies are trying to find ways to curtail not just piracy but legitimate fair use. They fought VCR's when they first came out and the movie studios fought television when it first came out.

    They are short sighted and almost always fight what ends up making them a lot of money when they lose. The danger is they may not lose this time.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  6. I don't have a DVD player... by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...you insensitive clod.

    I'm still waiting for two features they never brought over from VHS:

    1. A format that will ALWAYS fast forward when I hit the fast forward button. (same with rewind)
    2. A format that will withstand the destructive force of a toddler. (Though I do applaud the DVD's resistance to heat from a car.)

    If this new-fangled DRM standard player would provide me with those things (and have a low cost), I'd look into buying one. I'm not holding my breath.

  7. Re:The market will decide... by Inda · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do you know who we have to thank for the fact the every DVD player sold in the UK is multi-region?

    Tescos, Asda Walmart and Sainsburys.

    The supermarkets have reputations to keep. If the average shopper cannot play every disk under the sun then he returns the DVD player with no questions asked. He also grumbles about the supermarket to all his friends in the traditional British way.

    Tescos want everyone to be happy with their purchases. They want everyone to be happy with their cheap 30 pound player. Everyone is happy, including me.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  8. Planned obsolescence? by mhollis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Frankly, were I a lawyer, as soon as these things started being sold to the channel, I'd try to put together a class-action lawsuit claiming harm to the class of people who previously purchased recording devices that were being legally used that now had to go out and purchase new units.

    Also, the fact that these new units would cost more due to the implimentation of this copy-protection scheme creates additional actionable harm.

    I would add, for the benefit of karlandtanya that the term fair use also refers to the permission to exhibit or broadcast copyrighted material due to a news event, like the death of a person connected with the material, a photograph of a person and so on. Fair use in the United States exists for a period of 48 hours and then it expires. In that event, one might be able to use one's home-digitized material on a blog as long as the link was removed in 48 hours, though this has certianly not been tested.

    What he is referring to is home copying, which is legal as a result of the Sony Betamax Case that specifically allows home recording and copying and storing of material for personal use.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.