Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Drops Windows XP for Itanium

MBCook writes "According to an article on The Register, Microsoft has canceled the version of Windows XP for Intel's Itanium processor. They will continue to sell Windows Server 2003 for the Itanium in the high-end server market, but 'For the mainstream server and workstation markets, however, we believe we can best serve our customers needs with Windows Server 2003 Standard x64 Edition, and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition, respectively.' So much for Itainum workstations running Windows, but then again the article notes that no major vendors actually sell Itanium workstations anymore."

4 of 422 comments (clear)

  1. Re:dear slashdot by xNoLaNx · · Score: 5, Informative

    To put it nicely, Slashdot rarely breaks news. To put it specifically, this is common. Slashdot depends on user submission for them to have any idea what's going on.

  2. Re:Itanic hits Iceberg. News at 11. by rainman_bc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Intel dropped support for Alpha and MIPS

    What? I thought Alpha was made by DEC... What support did Intel have for Alpha? You probably meant that Microsoft dropped support for Alpha and MIPS.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  3. Re:Not too big of a surprise... by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Totally wrong. HP pulled out of Itanium development, and Intel bought their part of the development team.

    For some reason, Intel and HP have been working together all this time in developing the Itanium, ever since Compaq bought DEC (maker of the Alpha), and then HP bought Compaq. Suddenly, HP has brightened up and realized they don't need to help their vendor develop their processor, so now Intel is taking it all over, and HP will concentrate on making systems that use the processor. At least, that's the spin Intel puts on it.

    According to Intel, Itanium production is still going forward with no plans to decrease it.

  4. Re:Important Lesson for Intel by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I call bullshit.
    It was not an attempt to drop backwards compatibility, but rather an attempt to produce a product vastly superior to an x86 based design.
    Itanium was not designed for the desktop, or even the standard server market. It was designed for number crunching, which it works quite well at.
    Is a Cray XT3 backwards compatible with a Cray1 or even a YMP?
    NO.
    Same thing goes here. In fact Itanium was designed to compete with the likes of Cray. It was never, ever, designed with desktop in mind.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump