Slashdot Mirror
Saturn's Moon Iapetus Has A 'Belt'
Believe writes "In another unexpected find by Cassini-Huygens, Saturn's moon Iapetus shows a bulging waistline. According to the story, the dark side of the moon is almost perfectly bisected by a tall, narrow ridge that runs for 1300 km (808 mi) and rises up to 20 km (12 mi) high. This height is amazing in such a small moon; it rivals Olympus Mons on Mars which is a body 5 times its size."
...but you don't see it on the front page of Slashdot.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
I think the belt is a physical feature on the moons surface - not a floating belt of debris, rock, etc.
"Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
That's no moon.
I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
This cant be coincidence..
It is surprising in the way these mountains are on the moon's equator and form a nice belt.
That there is little erosion isn't a surprise, but the mountains origin is far more interesting.
On earth mountains are all results of our molten core (plate tektonics and vulcanoes). There must be some process that created this moutain belt.
Jeroen
Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
I think it is the remains of the ancient circum-Iapetus particle accelerator.
Ahhhahahah! hahahaha! hahahaha...ooooo, just shoot me now.
UTF-8: There and Back Again
For several reasons:
On Earth mountains are caused by plate tectonics, i.e. disconnected area of crust floating on magma that run into each other, but such mechanism are impossible on small bodies because they cool too fast, i.e their crust quickly become too thick and form a single fused objet.
Of course mountains can also be volcanoes, but similarly this implies magma that can rise to the surface, i.e a crust that is not too thick.
The exception are moons close enough to their parent body so that internal heat can be sustained by tidal effects. This is the case on Io, for example.
However there can only be tidal effects if the moon is rotating around itself at a different rate as it revolves around its parent body. For Iapetus, just like our moon, the two rates are the same and they always present the same face to their parent. This implies only minimal tidal effects due to the eccentricity of the orbit.
Of course the mountain/volcano may have been formed a very long time ago when the moon wasn't as cool as it is now, probably this is the case for mount Olympus on Mars, however there is erosion on most planetary bodies even without atmosphere or low gravity, caused by the myriad of asteroid impact they sustain.
One remaining option is impact by a large asteroid. We now have to come up with a reasonable impact scenario that can produce a feature similar to the one seen on Iapetus, which is indeed very strange.
Thanks.
Stories like this make slashdot cool.
Does it go on forever?
o_O.
:O
It's a giant space WALNUT.
I have two theories...
Less possible:
What I'd look for are two large craters of similar size and same age (can be estimated by amount of erosion from later meteorites), placed on opposite sides of the moon, shifted from the surface of the intersection by similar distance in opposite directions. Strong enough hit could have just split the moon it two...
More possible:
The moon had its own ring, just like Saturn has. But the ring's rotation was slowed down by Saturn's gravity (the same way our Moon's rotation got stopped by Earth) and the ring was pulled by the moon's gravity down, on the surface, depositing all the material straight below its orbit.
Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
And that is definitely a parting line, just an artifact of the mold.
Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
Article submitter didn't take Astronomy 101 apparently. Small planetoids tend to have more prominent geological features than larger planets because stronger gravity pulls everything together harder and flattens things out. For instance, Olympus Mons on Mars is much higher than any mountain on Earth precisely because Earth has stronger gravity.
Why? There is a limit on which heights are possible for a given celestial body (planets etc., that is, I'm not counting in stars here), and that limit is actually higher for a smaller body (for example, a volcano the size (height) of Olympus Mons wouldn't even theoretically be possible on earth).
quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
There is a short-story by Clarke about a universe that contains only one sun and one planet, the universe is about as big as the planets orbit. The planet is constantly showing the same face toward the sun, it has a day-side, very hot, and anight side, very cold. Humans live around the equator where the temperature is right.
In the book the universe actually ends somewhere around the north pole(dark side) of the planet and a long time ago humans built a great wall to hide the end of the universe... great short-story.
Many of the smaller moons/asteroids are barely spherical, and having been hit so often, barely held together by gravity. given the size of the impact crater, it is possible this moon was nearly torn apart by that impact, and the belt is a relic of that event.
Some of the smaller moons & asteroids out there are more like piles of rubble held together by gravity than solid bodies - thus the headaches in what to do if one were ever found to be on collision course with earth, since an attempt to move it of course would merely fragment the body..
"You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
Oh come on. Give it a break. It was built a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. It has a lot of miles and a lot of years on it. I think it looks good for its age.
When 4 billion years you become, look as good you will not.
There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
I, for one, welcome our new giant, spacefaring squirrel overlords.
-What have you contributed lately?