Slashdot Mirror


The Coming Expensing of Employee Stock Options

An anonymous reader writes "This accounting change will reverberate loudly throughout geekdom. "Users of financial statements...expressed to the FASB their concerns that (the current handling of stock options) results in financial statements that do not faithfully represent the economic transactions affecting the issuer, namely, the receipt and consumption of employee services in exchange for equity instruments. Financial statements that do not faithfully represent those economic transactions can distort the issuer's reported financial condition and results of operations, which can lead to the inappropriate allocation of resources in the capital markets." Taken from FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Dec 2004). A FAQ has been published as well." Yes; the data is from 12/16/04, but this will be a huge change in how tech companies work.

3 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Who Gets Stock Options? by NardofDoom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hell, I'd just like to be paid overtime.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  2. Why this is important.. by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is important because companies that do not report this method of compensation (stock options) have inflated reported financials because options were not properly accounted for on the statements. So, what does that mean? Analysts and investors did not have full disclosure as to how future stock options being exercised would really affect the company in the long (or sometimes short) term.

    This will not only change the way that tech companies operate and report, but other huge publically traded corporations. When a company lures a big name CEO/CFO, and promises hundreds of thousands or millions of stock options to be exercised at a later date, that dillution of equity (even though in the future) was not being properly declared on the financial statements. Now that the FASB (financial account standards board) has made this recommendation/ruling, companies must comply.

    This is what one might call "truth in financial reporting", and I'm very glad to see that this has passed. This has been a very long existing loophole that large companies have used to the detriment of our investment community, and the general public (i.e. our domestic economy) as a whole. Don't be blindsided by the rhetoric that only "tech companies" will be affected by this -- there were a LOT of big corporate powers that did not want to see FASB rule, and whenever you have that, you always have to wonder what their reasons are. I encourage you to read the FAQ, and read any news articles you can regarding this ruling. I think you'll agree this is a very positive thing.

  3. Here you go: by Proaxiom · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Faithful translation:
    [Stock options result] in financial statements that do not faithfully represent the economic transactions affecting the issuer, namely, the receipt and consumption of employee services in exchange for equity instruments...

    Stock options amount to the company giving money to employees...

    ...Financial statements that do not faithfully represent those economic transactions can distort the issuer's reported financial condition and results of operations...

    ...without showing up on the company's books, making them look a little rosier than they really are...

    ...which can lead to the inappropriate allocation of resources in the capital markets.

    ...thus inflating the stock price and ripping off investors.