World's First BTX Mini-PC
CTZ writes "We have direct information from CES 2005 show floor that covers Shuttle's first BTX Mini-PC. It's also the world's first BTX system ever displayed. "Shuttle also had a rather sizable booth with an entire line of their products displayed, as it can be seen from the images throughout this article. Perhaps the most important interesting product they had on the show floor was the world's first XPC based on Intel's BTX standard. Shuttle is looking to make the system affordable, so they have decided to use steel for the chassis instead of aluminum. According to Shuttle, this will bring the cost of the XPC system down by $130.00. The only downside, as some may perceive it, is that the BTX XPC system will be 1" wider than regular XPCs, but regardless, you can expect the same quality from Shuttle."
Agreed. I went back to the article twice because I thought I might have missed some hidden "read more" or "more pictures here" link. Nope. Just about as much info in the summary as in the article itself, and two lousy pictures. Wa-hoo.
Won't steel add weight to the thing?
Also, the one and only experience I've had with Shuttles was when the one we had had its power supply fail. Hardly a good statistical sampling, but it was fairly new, so I personally have a negative view of Shuttle quality, but I may be in the minority on that one.
here's an Anandtech article on BTX:-7 6
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=18
It's posted to slashdot by the same guy who runs the website. What do you expect? :)
Again, AnandTech saves the day
i =2317&p=15
i =2317&p=6
i =2317&p=5
BTX: http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?
Shuttle: http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?
More Shuttle: http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?
God forbid CTX actually covered the show instead of just rewriting press releases...
Ok, the article is hardly loading for me.. so here are some mirrors of the 2 images from this article and some other images from some other article about the Shuttle stand (I forget where that was, thanks to the original site whoever it was).
Link
Link
and from the other article...
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
I had one of the very early shuttle models--FX25 or something that like, and it was loud as hell. Now we're using a bunch of SS51G's I think is the model, P4's, at work, and you can barely hear them, period. They're great.
I'm surprised that using steel instead of aluminum would cut $130 off the price. Aluminum only costs about $0.83/lb. Does it cost a lot to shape or something? I'd expect the harder steel to cost more to work.
I'm an engineer specialized in manufacturing and I've done some work recently sourcing steel for stampings. Steel prices, along with other raw materials, have gone through the roof in the last year or so largely due to demand from China. (I was there recently and you cannot believe the amount of construction going on unless you see it. Absolutely amazing.) As of a month ago, I was getting quotes on steel that were generally in the range of $0.45-$0.57/lb depending on the alloy you wanted and where you needed it. (this is in North America) If you want forgings or something shaped, that will add to the cost. On a weight basis the steel can't cost more than $15-25 (and that's generous) given the amount of material in a typical case.
$130 seems like a lot just for materials savings unless they were using unusual alloys or really getting ripped off on the labor. Steel is actually pretty easy to work with, often easier than aluminum in my experience. Aluminum is so soft you often have to be careful with coolants and cutting speeds. There are structural considerations sometimes too. Aluminum requires different amounts of material for the same structural strength. But the difference isn't exactly night and day. Frankly I'm having a hard time figuring out where $130 in material savings would come from since the amount of material is so small.
For a simple home server, I'd recommend the following: AOpen (yes, AOpen, they use SPI power supplies, very tough) 340D cases, very nice and reasonably well made for a good price. or: Antec ARIA case, a bit more expensive, but quiet, and very cool looking, also cool temeperature wise because of the aluminum construction. Asus or Intel motherboard. Believe it or not, the Intel boards are reasonably priced (at least when compared to Tier I like Asus, Supermicro, etc....) Then, you can pick and choose other components such as HD, optical drives, etc.... and chances are you're not going got get stuck with a Realtek NIC on-board. For what it's worth, we build industrial servers and CPE PCs for companies deploying all across North America and the world. In their case, an extra $100 on a system for increased MTBF is worth it.... not sure what your case is. As far as the shuttle stuff, we've noticed a huge number of these coming back over the years. We stopped selling them long ago because of inital quality, but out-of-warranty claims from the competition on personal use has been staggering lately with regard to the voltage regulators in front of the CPU.... litteraly, they blow the CPUs because of bad regulation and introduction of off-frequency ripple.
Have to agree with you here.
Got two dead shuttles littering my living room. I ended up ripping the CPU out of my A64 one and putting it into a normal mobo and its been working fine since then.
I like the form factor, but none of the manufacturers are making very reliable kit. If you want reliable, try Asus or Gigabyte mobos in a standard case.
The small form factor sure looks cute, but its not buying you anything in the way of reliability.
So call me a shuttle fanboy -- I can take it. As soon as they offer a flex-ATX that takes the 64-bit AMD athlon AND has support for PCI-express, I'll upgrade the gaming box.
Some points have been raised that BTX is a more bloated form factor than the traditional shuttle flex-ATX that we've been used to, and I'd agree. I think that the increase in size is due to a couple things:
When I first started building PCs some 4 years ago, I became used to having to unravel driver and moboard firmware issues as part of the job. With each of my shuttles -- each sporting a different OS -- I've had zero issues. Linux support has been great (I've only tried Fedora Core, RedHat9 and Suse, so the sample size ain't all that large, admittedly).
For me, the biggest plusses of XPCs are that they have fewer fans (and are, hence, more quiet), are very portable, and where I used to have one biga$$ tower I can have three shuttles. If I were putting together a cluster/server farm, they'd probably be a good choice, too, because I could cram lots of them into a small space.
SFFs are getting a lot more exposure, and I think that's a good thing. That Shuttle is emerging into the BTX space is also a good thing, imho.
.. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R