Breakthrough In JPEG Compression
Kris_J writes "The makers of the (classic) compression package Stuffit have written a program that can compress JPGs by roughly 30%. This isn't the raw image to JPG compression, this is lossless compression applied to the JPG file. Typical compression rates for JPGs are 2% to -1%. If you read the whitepaper (PDF), they are even proposing a new image format; StuffIt Image Format (SIF). Now I just need someone to write a SIF compressor for my old Kodak DC260."
An image compression comparison with no lenna? What's the world coming to?
I am trolling
"BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
The results can be seen by the /. logo I have reduced here:
You're right. I read the list, reproduced below. Who'd want to:
After all, electronic storage media is infinite, and bandwidth is free!100% compression of a file is easy. It's the decompression of that file into the original that's the tricky bit.
Lzip
P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
They always do stuff like that. First, they kill Kennedy. Then, they land a man on the moon, but it wasn't someone we wanted to leave there - so money was spent bringing him back. Then, they do the watergate thing, then the 1980 olympics which led to a bad movie (and they knew it would, too). Lately, they've just been doing a lot of stuff that pisses me off.
One day, I'll find them - then they'll get what's coming to them. God help me, I'll use both sides of my hand.
Well, that clears things up nicely...
(tig)
Ignorance and prejudice and fear
Walk hand in hand
So now I get the picture, only smaller!
> I would make the assumption that since jpeg is over 18years old, compression algroithms are at their limit for this image format.
Uh, dude - they just came out with this! So how can you say that? I would say this will actually ignite the minds of open-source compression experts (no, not literally) to rethink their approach to compressing JPEG, since they now know it's doable loselessly.
Must-not-watch TV!
And you've managed lossy compression of "little", but unfortunately your compression ratio was 0%. Better luck next time, fucking grammar nazi.