Slashdot Mirror


Deep Impact Blasts Off For Comet Tempel 1

Wynken de Word writes "NASA's Deep Impact, a copper-fortified, comet-busting spacecraft, was launched Wednesday afternoon. 'NASA had a single second - at precisely eight seconds past 1:47 p.m. - to send Deep Impact on a 431-million-kilometre, six-month voyage to Comet Tempel 1.' The goal is to blast a big hole in the comet and check out what's preserved inside. Also see the Deep Impact site."

39 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. Do You Suppose... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Do you suppose there may be people on earth who might be angred by a blasphemous attack on a heavenly chariot?

    "cor! they put a ding in our chariot! call AAA!"

    I sure hope they did a better job of packing this one.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. Damn by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where is Bruce Willis when you need him.

    1. Re:Damn by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...Hopefully filming a decent movie! ;)

  3. Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wont the inhabitants of this comet regard this as an act of war?

  4. editorializing by phriedom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Do comets and our own planet have something in common? This clever mission could answer the question once and for all. "

    Very rarely is anything complex answered once and for all.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  5. Re:How do instruments survive the crash?? by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


    That's all mentioned in the article, which I'm sure you read but forgot. A TV sized unit will seperate a day earlier and go smack into the "big rock". The other craft will monitor from a safe distance.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  6. Intentional? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 5, Funny
    For the first time, NASA is setting off on a collision course with a comet

    Good to see that for once a crash-course is intentional for NASA. Mayhap they have found their niche... :)

  7. I was just thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The goal is to blast a big hole in the comet and check out what's preserved inside.

    Is that what has happened to the goatse-guy?

  8. As always ..... by deglr6328 · · Score: 4, Informative

    As always there are updates at spaceflightnow.com. It appears the spacecraft has safed itself as of a few minutes ago....not good.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    1. Re:As always ..... by Halthar · · Score: 5, Funny

      It means the rocket blue screened and rebooted inself into safe mode. Unfortunately as a result of this it's only going to send back images at 640x480.

    2. Re:As always ..... by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's OK now, according to NASA, it deployed it's solar panels and oriented itself like it was supposed to.

      They're saying it was most likely a non-critical glitch with a temperature sensor that kicked in the failsafe.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:As always ..... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Temperature sensor eh? I think the probe is getting cold feet. "You want me to what?!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  9. future news by Norgus · · Score: 5, Funny
    "nasa accidentally redirects comet, now headed for earth"

    Doh!

    1. Re:future news by snake_dad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know you are kidding, but on the off chance that anyone actually believes that: the impact is a bit like trowing a pingpong ball in front of a speeding truck. There is simply not enough kinetic energy to significantly alter the orbit of the comet, definately not enough to put it in an Earth intercepting orbit.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  10. Re: I betcha by wasted · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know if they will find rock or not. I looked inside of my can of Comet(TM) and all that is inside is some greenish white cleanser.

  11. Perhaps the most interesting quote of the article by heyitsme · · Score: 4, Funny

    The impactor will disintegrate instantly when it hits, as will its small payload, a compact disc containing more than 500,000 names of people who wanted to vicariously tag along.

    Man, I want to be on that CD!

  12. If missed.... by fred911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "NASA had a single second - at precisely eight seconds past 1:47 p.m. - to send Deep Impact on a 431-million-kilometre, six-month voyage to Comet Tempel 1" Missing this window of oportunity will prevent the residents of ISS their yearly alotment of ice, a necessary precursor for snowcones.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  13. umm..Deep Impact like the movie?? by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anyone else find it disturbing that NASA named a mission aimed to penetrate a comet after a [bad] movie about a comet penetrating the Earth?

    I guess it's better than Armageddon - they probably couldn't get funding for that one.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  14. What's inside? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rock.
    M$'s sense of morality.
    Linux community's sense of Joe6Pack Useability(tm)
    A chewy creamy center

  15. Re:Wonderful by nuclear305 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because science is not measured by how many people we send into space.

  16. Hmmph! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Do comets and our own planet have something in common? This clever mission could answer the question once and for all. "

    Very rarely is anything complex answered once and for all.

    Obviously you don't read the Weekly World News.

    BTW, chief NASA engineer Bat Boy assures me that everything is going as planned.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  17. Re:Where has originalty gone? by nuclear305 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sure you just forgot this after reading the article, but the names of the movie and project were apparently derived independently of each other--and around the same time.

    It's not like 2004 rolled around and someone who saw the movie decided to call the project 'Deep Impact'

  18. Re:I betcha by Datamonstar · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is another slightly smaller comet inside...

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  19. Re:Where has originalty gone? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rewind to Jan 2nd, and search. (You can pick up a few +5 posts for reuse while you're there.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  20. Ingredients by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    i bet it's rock inside... just a guess :)

    Rock, ice, a funny little guy with a trojan helmet (squashed by the probe), a dog with a trojan helmet, a gumball machine full of instant martians and MSG.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  21. Possible implications by davidmcn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We, as a race, don't know all that much really about "whats out there." But we are still able to figure out where a comet is going to be an how to impact it. But did we stop to think about the possible implications this mission could have on the universe? They were talking on the news about how it will probably make a crater the size of a football field. We already know that that is a huge amount of force.

    Think about it like this, you have an 800 pound mass (the 1st rocket, destined for impact) traveling at 37000 kph. Effectively creating the force of 4 and a half tons of TNT going off. If this explosion happened at the surface it would probably make no difference whatsoever, but its not. Will this impact alter the trajectory of the comet? It might only slightly shift it, but for a planet far far away, that slight shift might be enough to cause a ELE on the planet that the comet might now ultamitely hit.

    I realize its a longshot scenario, and I'm sure taken into account at some point. But was it taken seriously enough?

    Anyway, just my little, "are we considering everything" thoughts....

    --
    Memories become legend, Legend fades to myth, and even myth is forgotten by the time that age comes again.-Robert Jordan
    1. Re:Possible implications by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's possible to predict the solar system very far into the future with very high accuracy, since it's an almost perfect Newtonian system- it's in a vacuum, so there's no friction, and the masses and volumes involved are very large, so there are no tiny, chaotic behaviors to worry about. About the only thing that could make for a large inaccuracy in the prediction is a massive body NASA hasn't detected yet, but AFAIK the last time that happened was the discovery of Pluto in 1930. NASA knows exactly what this impact will do to the comet's path.

    2. Re:Possible implications by Severious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any species advanced enough to figure out that we were responsibe for deflecting a rock and to travel light years seeking retribution for our misdeeds is advanced enough to deal with said space rock before it does any harm.

      Not to mention that rock is in orbit around the Sun so it is much more likly it will hit us than anyone else.

      I think you are vastly overestimating our ability to have any effect the rest of the galaxy let alone our own solar system.

      --
      Tinfoil hat? Naa, I long since replaced it with a reinforced titanium alloy.
  22. Launch Window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to clarify, Deep Impact didn't have a launch window of only 1:47:08 PM EST, it also could have launched at 1:08:20 PM EST for 12 January 2004. It actually had until 28 January to launch.

  23. Re:Wonderful by peter303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By how many we get back alive?

  24. Who wouldn't? by Racter · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the ultimate disc of greatest hits.

  25. Childish, I know . . . by Raccroc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Deep Impact - $330 millon dollars and it looks like a vibrator...Where the fuck are the jokes?

  26. wack Saturn moon tommorrow! by peter303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On a related topic, Huygens impacts Saturn 36 hours from the time of this posting. This is the most distant physical impact ever (since Galileo sailed into Jupiter's clouds). Will we find rock, ice, or a hydrocarbon ocean?

  27. Smacking Comets vs. Fixing Shuttle by Rob+Carr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, NASA is fixing the shuttle as much as it can be fixed. We really need a better launch system for humans and probably a separate heavy launch system. Shuttle reliability and cost/kg in orbit have some integral problems.

    Second, there's a heck of a lot we need to know about space. For example, the comet will tell us what the early solar system was made of. This is useful in that it tells us about the remnants of supernovas that produce most of the elements we're made of (except for hydrogen). The data will help us fine-tune our understanding of how our solar system was created - are Earth-like planets rare or common?

    Lastly, taking a longer view, this is a preparatory mission for man's emergence from the cradle Earth. We'll know what comets are made of, how they're put together (rubble or solid) and what we'll need to know to move them. Why move a comet? Two reasons - one, if one's aimed at Earth, it would be a useful skill. Two, if you want to provide a cheap source of water, comets might be a good source, either placed into orbit, or deposited on Mars for use by colonies later.

    Karma Killer:

    1. Smack comet into Mars
    2. 2. Colonize
    3. 3. Profit!

    I for one welcome our comet-moving overlords - as long as it's we ourselves.

    In Russia, the probe hits the comet!

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  28. Re:If it misses... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what would be wrong with that?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  29. Re:Wonderful by lucat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that you do not understand something doesn't mean that you can say that it is useless or unworthy. Bye, Luca

  30. Re:Perhaps the most interesting quote of the artic by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Funny
    I was wondering if anyone else had read that story in Analog. My co workers put my name on that CD, and then that story came out, and I wondered if they'd really done me a favor.

    If the aliens from the comet come and start killing the folks named on that CD, I'll just have to hope that my cow orkers mispelled my name, as usual.

  31. Bad wording or bad idea? by mswope · · Score: 2, Interesting

    'The goal is to blast a big hole in the comet and check out what's preserved inside.'

    Won't the impact change the makeup/properties of what *was* preserved inside? If nothing else, it's going to have a higher than normal copper content (and some bits of plastic from that CD).

    On the other hand, it does sound like fun. I *love* blowing stuff up!!!

  32. Re:How do instruments survive the crash?? by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    How can you call Huygens an "impactor"? It's a piggybacked probe, not an impactor. In fact, they're hoping that it will still be transmitting even after it lands (it has a small surface science package), although it'll be hitting at a pretty high speed for that, so who knows.

    I know this must make me a real geek, but I've been really excited lately... just think - in 1 day 10 hours, we'll have our first probe ever on Titan, one of the most interesting bodies in the solar system, and one that keeps stubbornly frustrating scientists ;) They'll probably start getting raw images up in 2 to 2 1/2 days... ah, what a nice Friday that will be ;)

    --
    We're practicing our labials.