Slashdot Mirror


Morse Code Used by Human Cells?

Roland Piquepaille writes "Researchers from several universities and drug companies in the U.K. have discovered that our cells are using Morse-like signals to switch genes on and off. The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) write that this discovery may have major implications for the pharmaceutical industry. Better and more efficient drugs would only deliver the signals to our cells that will activate a desired behavior. Sounds like science fiction? Read more for other details, references and pictures."

16 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. The ham radio folks will be happy to hear this... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me guess: One more justification for hanging onto the 5WPM morse requirement, right?

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  2. Aha! by MutantHamster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Human cells did it first. I knew that Morse guy was a fraud all along.

    --
    My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
  3. subliminal messages... by jpardey · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...just got a lot more fun

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  4. The truth about Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot: Is there a connection?

    I think most of you are aware of the controversy surrounding regular Slashdot article submitter Roland Piquepaille. For those of you who don't know, please allow me to bring forth all the facts. Roland Piquepaille has an online journal (I refuse to use the word "blog") located at http://www.primidi.com/. It is titled "Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends". It consists almost entirely of content, both text and pictures, taken from reputable news websites and online technical journals. He does give credit to the other websites, but it wasn't always so. Only after many complaints were raised by the Slashdot readership did he start giving credit where credit was due. However, this is not what the controversy is about.

    Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends serves online advertisements through a service called Blogads, located at www.blogads.com. Blogads is not your traditional online advertiser; rather than base payments on click-throughs, Blogads pays a flat fee based on the level of traffic your online journal generates. This way Blogads can guarantee that an advertisement on a particular online journal will reach a particular number of users. So advertisements on high traffic online journals are appropriately more expensive to buy, but the advertisement is guaranteed to be seen by a large amount of people. This, in turn, encourages people like Roland Piquepaille to try their best to increase traffic to their journals in order to increase the going rates for advertisements on their web pages. But advertisers do have some flexibility. Blogads serves two classes of advertisements. The premium ad space that is seen at the top of the web page by all viewers is reserved for "Special Advertisers"; it holds only one advertisement. The secondary ad space is located near the bottom half of the page, so that the user must scroll down the window to see it. This space can contain up to four advertisements and is reserved for regular advertisers, or just "Advertisers". Visit Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends (http://www.primidi.com/) to see it for yourself.

    Before we talk about money, let's talk about the service that Roland Piquepaille provides in his journal. He goes out and looks for interesting articles about new and emerging technologies. He provides a very brief overview of the articles, then copies a few choice paragraphs and the occasional picture from each article and puts them up on his web page. Finally, he adds a minimal amount of original content between the copied-and-pasted text in an effort to make the journal entry coherent and appear to add value to the original articles. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Now let's talk about money. Visit http://www.blogads.com/order_html?adstrip_category =tech&politics= to check the following facts for yourself. As of today, December XX 2004, the going rate for the premium advertisement space on Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends is $375 for one month. One of the four standard advertisements costs $150 for one month. So, the maximum advertising space brings in $375 x 1 + $150 x 4 = $975 for one month. Obviously not all $975 will go directly to Roland Piquepaille, as Blogads gets a portion of that as a service fee, but he will receive the majority of it. According to the FAQ, Blogads takes 20%. So Roland Piquepaille gets 80% of $975, a maximum of $780 each month. www.primidi.com is hosted by clara.net (look it up at http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/index. jhtml). Browsing clara.net's hosting solutions, the most expensive hosting service is their Clarahost Advanced (http://www.uk.clara.net/clarahost/advanced.php) priced at £69.99 GBP. This is

    1. Re:The truth about Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What you call "distilling" others would call "blatent plagarism". Roland is a repeated lying plagarist, and you are aparently an unknowning tool of his. Too bad the Slashdot masters don't have the balls to honestly admit what the real relationship between them and Roland really is.

    2. Re:The truth about Roland Piquepaille by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you know how much he is making?

      using a hour per day for 1000$ doesn't sound too bad.

      the thing is, the guy makes no content of his own, offers no visions of his own, offers no insight of his own. offers no clever linking of information to other types of same kind of information. does stories(CUTS AND PASTES) in 'bulk', submits them to slashdot in bulk. writes boringly. doesn't even focus on any particular area of science, technology or society.

      karma be damned, fuck roland - IF THE FUCKING BLOG WOULD BE INTRESTING AS WHOLE ___OTHER___ PEOPLE WOULD FUCKING SUBMIT THE STORIES - JUST MAKE IT INTRESTING, NO NEED TO WHORE YOURSELF.

      he could at least have courtesy to submit the stories under fake aliases.

      and slashdot: if you pass his stories without blinking - Make him a fucking editor or add custom filtering.

      and people with mod points.. mod the grandparent up just for kicks. or me down(it's not like i'd drop from excellent anyways).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  5. Wtf is this press release saying? by harvardian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The number of 'dots and dashes' being used by each signal could have different purposes, all of which could be modified by a drug.

    Alright, I work in a chemical biology lab, and I don't know wtf this is supposed to mean. It's common for proteins to have their localization controlled by phosphorylation (i.e., a transcription factor, which is a protein that turns a gene on when bound to DNA, can only get into the nucleus to do its job depending on whether it's been phosphorylated or not). But what does "signal" mean in this context? The press release doesn't offer any scientific details.

    This is really just all hype until they can make a claim beyond vague analogies. So why does this make the front page of Slashdot?

    1. Re:Wtf is this press release saying? by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Insightful


      This is really just all hype until they can make a claim beyond vague analogies. So why does this make the front page of Slashdot?


      Because Roland posted it.

  6. lame -.. ness ..- filter .... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So a geneticist's lame metaphor for any "pattern of signals", Morse code, goes over a journalist's head, and makes it to the Slashdot homepage. If only we cell megacolonies were smart enough to decipher these patterns of signals, we might actually get meaningful insights into the infomechanics of DNA.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  7. Re:No shit? by shawb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, it's been known that they use a pattern in that the arrangement of base units in a line represents a pattern. AFAIK it has not been general knowledge in the biology community that there is a temporal pattern involved with this activation as well. And DNA turning on and off is a little simplistic, there are such things as rate of transcription, how many simultaneous transcriptions occur, etc.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  8. Re:Binary Code by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, there are 4 units in morse code, the dash, the dot, the space between letters, and a longer space between words.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  9. Re:Hopefully, we will all soon realize that... by harvardian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's nothing in that press release to convince me that a "major signaling pathway" has been discovered. There was just an overblown analogy; no science was explained.

    And maybe you think biology is "oversold" because you don't know anything about it. Does anybody in your family take a statin (for lowering cholesterol levels)? If so, you should know that amazingly little details have been worked out about why those drugs work, down to the proteins that sit on the endoplasmic reticulum that are involved in cholesterol metabolism regulation, and the enzymes that interact with them. We know how that regulatory pathway eventually trickles down to interaction with DNA via transcription factors.

    Maybe you shouldn't bite the hand that feeds you out of ignorance.

  10. Everyone who replies to this article... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is just letting that turd Roland Piquepaille get more publicity for his blog. We need a slashdot boycott of these artciles, somehow. While we can't not reply (if we do, some loser or another will just reply anyway), maybe we can drown it out with comments that are uniform enough to get Taco's attention.

    I propose everyone comment (whether at thread root or in reply) with a subject of "Stop the Roland Piquepaille assfest now!" and a body of the same. If out of 150 comments, 80 or 90 of them were these, would they not at least give it some consideration?

  11. Another Roland Piquepaille blog post? by jdgeorge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps this is a bit off-topic, but...

    Various posts have appeared recently concerning the frequent appearance of articles like this one, submitted by Roland Piquepaille, containing links to what appears to be sparsely annotated collection text and images copied from other sources.

    It appears that Roland is successfully using Slashdot to generate advertising revenue for this "blog" (which sadly seems to have marginally higher editing standards than Slashdot itself). Perhaps he should be formally added to the Slashdot staff and made an editor instead of paying him informally in this way.

    The result might be improved Slashdot editing, and fewer links to a mediocre blog.

  12. Stop the Roland Piquepaille nightmare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    For christ's sake, if I read another ad for this asshole's fucking blog _where he doesn't even actually write any of the fucking content_, it'll be too fucking soon. Why the fuck do the editors insist on promoting this no-talent assclown?

    Dammit, it took fucking _forever_ for Katz to go away. Not fucking looking forward to doing that again, but looks like we're right back to it.

  13. Oh Good! by rubberbando · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now that we know how to communicate with them...

    Could someone convert the following messages to morris code for me?

    To my head hair follicles: START GROWING AGAIN!

    To my back, ear, and nose hair follicles : STOP GROWING SO MUCH!

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME