Slashdot Mirror


Linux Weekly News 2004 Timeline

Ridgelift writes "Linux Weekly News has made their annual 2004 Timeline available free to the general public. " Much happens in the Linux world over the course of a year. 2004 saw ongoing legal and political fights, new distributions, big releases of major applications, a new mode for kernel development, and more. This timeline is our attempt to separate out the most significant developments of the year and present them in a concise and enjoyable format. It continues an annual LWN tradition; it is the seventh in the series.""

27 of 46 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by entitude · · Score: 2, Funny

    This year really wasn't the year for Linux. Maybe 2005? =)

    --
    ----geppy -
  2. Free to the general public by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 2, Funny

    They made it "Free to the general public". Well, what a kind and noble gesture.

    --
    IAAL
  3. annual 2004 Timeline by kirun · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...has made their annual 2004 Timeline

    I wonder what next year's 2004 timeline will look like?

    --
    I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    1. Re:annual 2004 Timeline by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly the same, except sepia toned for that nostalgic feel.

      They do mention it's the 7th in the series though, which makes me wonder what 1998's 2004 Timeline looked like...probably a lot of flying cars and robot butlers and things like that.

  4. All I can say is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
  5. OMG by savagedome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Check this out. This is a goldmine. The dunk tank.

    http://lwn.net/Articles/66669/

  6. DeCSS, DVD Jon, Bunner by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    None of that has anything to do with linux. DeCSS has nothing to do with OSS, it has to do with your right to descramble your own DVDs.

    Actually, a lot of this list has nothing to do with linux, some just barely have to do with OSS in general, like the DeCSS stuff.

    Hell, news on OSS apps like GIMP doesn't have anything to do with linux. I've always used GIMP on Windows.

    What does the Sun/MSFT settlement have to do with linux?

    I guess without the cruft, the timeline would just be:

    January: Kernel version X released
    April: Kernel version X.1 released
    Novermber: Kernel version X.2 released

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:DeCSS, DVD Jon, Bunner by ecliptik · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes it does, since DeCSS is a known way of playing DVD's on a GNU/Linux machine in the abscence of commercial DVD software.

      and yes, I am aware of such offerings, but DeCSS still lets developers create their own open DVD playing software.

    2. Re:DeCSS, DVD Jon, Bunner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      DeCSS is a known way of playing DVD's on a GNU/Linux machine in the abscence of commercial DVD software

      One could just as easily say "DeCSS is a known way of playing DVD's on a FreeBSD machine in the abscence of commercial DVD software".

      The point is that a lot of stuff on the list is not specific to Linux.
  7. what timeline? by Jodka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was anyone besides me expecting to so, and disappointed not to find, an actual timeline, a graphical chart in the form of a line with labeled tic marks demarcating events?

    The link is over-billed. I'ts only a chronologically ordered table, not really a timeline.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  8. The predictable objection by iabervon · · Score: 1

    The second paragraph of this item from November is my favorite line from 2004.

    1. Re:The predictable objection by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      My favorite was this one:

      http://lwn.net/Articles/107110/

      It appears that the overall quality of code, and more importantly, the amount of QA, on various browsers touted as "secure", is not up to par with MSIE; the type of a test I performed requires no human interaction and involves nearly no effort. Only MSIE appears to be able to consistently handle [*] malformed input well, suggesting this is the only program that underwent rudimentary security QA testing with a similar fuzz utility.

      I wonder why I don't remember reading about that one here on slashdot.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:The predictable objection by chromatic · · Score: 1

      That was a popular article. See IE Shines on Broken Code.

  9. 2005 -- Year of Desktop Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The revolution will not come like a torrent that sweeps through IT departments, converting the unwashed masses to our ways. No, the revolution will continue slowly and quietly. Take heart that in the coming years, our noble cause shall be well known.

    We have continued to infiltrate the server room. We have rekindled the browser war. We have publicly proven that litigation and marketing cannot prevail over quality and enthusiasm. The open source model is reaching more mainstream audiences.

    More are beginning to question The Beast and its minions. More companies are understanding our cause. Some are allies while others, envisioning their own demise, are trying to regain a foothold which they ultimately cannot.

    It is a quiet night, but in that seeming calm we quietly fight. Slowly we position ourselves, quietly we make our way through it all until one day the opposing few open their eyes to see themselves surrounded.

    Take heart, soldiers. We will win. It's only a matter of time.

    1. Re:2005 -- Year of Desktop Linux by bonch · · Score: 1

      -- Random Slashdot post from mid-1998.

  10. Some really bad humor, just for you! by millennial · · Score: 1

    "The GNU Project celebrates its 20th anniversary."
    Guess it's not that GNU then, is it?

    The title for the page showing Linus going into the dunk tank? "Linus gets wet".

    "KOffice 1.3 is released" - alongside KOfficeSyrup.

    Sorry, but I really have nothing useful to contribute. I'm too busy trying to get Gentoo to install on a virtual machine without getting Flagrant Errors.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:Some really bad humor, just for you! by agent+dero · · Score: 1

      For the sake of all our sanity, just install Debian :P

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
    2. Re:Some really bad humor, just for you! by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

      Trying to get any Linux distro other than Mepis to work on a virtual machine is pretty painful.

  11. It's rather sad by bonch · · Score: 1

    For the most part, there wasn't a lot to report on related to Linux in 2004, other than SCO, SCO, SCO. And that was in the first six months.

    1. Re:It's rather sad by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was hoping to see something more technical, along the lines of:

      January: support for architecture X included in 2.4

      Febuary: driver tulip.o expands support for cards X, Y, Z

      March: stratjakt's HP deskjet finally works like TFA says it will.

      April: ATI drivers that don't suck come along

      etc etc

      I have a short list of hardware that I'm really eager to see supported under linux (mostly Hauppages PVR-500MCE so I can have dual-tuner MythTV goodness for ~the same price as the 250), and that can be some hard info to find when you have to google a million forums, and most of the hits are just other people asking "Does this card work in linux?"

      Changelogs are too esoteric. They say stuff like "added support for Conexant B52387fdf-X341 encoder chip".

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  12. My 2004 timeline abttle 2005 looking bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ok, I admit this is a plea for any sort of attention to a bug in 2.6.10 but are you able to put yourself in empathy with me here.

    Summer: upgrade to 2.6.x, love it

    Late Nov: upgrade to 2.6.9, love it

    After Christmas: upgrade to 2.6.10 and buy new hardware with 2.6.10 support only

    Jan 2005: Find both Vanilla 2.6.9 & 2.6.10 kernels crash after 2 days running (no acpi or preempt). Can't believe it. Can't downgrade as now need the hardware support in 2.6.10. Shocked. Try to file a bug report:

    http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4010

    Maybe I didn't do it well but seems there's no one out there to say so. Is anyone out there?

    I'm suprised never had anything like this. I'm sure there's something amiss, some mistake.

    Now: Computer is turned off.

    Tomorrow: -1 troll probably

    1. Re:My 2004 timeline abttle 2005 looking bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Can you include a shot of the *first* lines of the panic?

    2. Re:My 2004 timeline abttle 2005 looking bad! by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      2.6.10 has been fine for me... If that is the first kernel version that supports your hardware then clearly the drivers for this hardware are very new and not thoroughly tested, which is what your doing.. Give it time and file a few bug reports and it will get fixed.. Lots of non opensource drivers are incredibly buggy the first few revisions too.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  13. LWN not only kernel news by greppling · · Score: 2, Informative
    While covering news related to the kernel development (with lots of good technical articles that make it well worth to subscribe if you are interested that) is certainly the core of "Linux Weekly News", it isn't restricted to that. It roughly covers what a GNU/Linux-based free software developer or technically interested users would want to know about. That includes software patent issues, IP issues as far as they related to free software, everything concerning security of GNU/Linux systems, platform-independant free software etc.

    And this is not a Linux kernel timeline, but an LWN timeline.

  14. wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Much happens in the Linux world over the course of a year.

    Is that so? Who would have thought that could ever happen??

  15. Like the year of the lan by bluGill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back in the late '80s and early '90s every year was predicted to be the year that LANs finally exploded. Never happened. A few people here and there put in a LAN, but there was no massive explosion of installations. Then one day someone looked and low and behold everyone had a LAN.

    Likewise the linux desktop will not explode overnight. Instead a few companies here and there will get sick of Windows, or need something special that Windows doesn't give, but linux allows them to write. Those companies will install linux. Perhaps not even all at once, just for the few people who need it. Slowly, slowly, slowly, linux will get better while it gets a few wins. Suddenly one day we will look back and see linux everywhere.

    Of course on that day *BSD people like me will sigh and go on using our better OS that never gets any press... ;)

  16. Kind & noble gestures by Max+Hyre · · Score: 1

    You sound like you're in a snit about it.

    LWN is a going concern, paying its employees (a pittance, I suspect), ISP, and bandwidth from subscriptions. This is because when LWN announced its demise due to lack of funding, an outcry from readers, with offers of money, caused them to reconsider.

    The one-week delay for certain juicy bits is an inducement for the general public to help by subscribing.

    If you don't like it, don't read it, and in any case don't complain about how an excellent site stays in business.

    Max Hyre, a happy LWN subscriber
    --
    I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/