Slashdot Mirror
Pair Arrested After Telling Lawyer Jokes
fembots writes "Two men were arrested for telling lawyer jokes while standing in line leading into First District Court. A spokesman for the Nassau courts said the men were causing a stir and that their exercise of their First Amendment rights to free speech was impeding the rights of others at the court."
Reading the article, however, makes me wonder if we're really getting the whole story here. Given that these aren't just two random individuals but the founders of "Americans for Legal Reform", I personally smell an increased likelyhood that their side of things contains a certain amount of BS. Of course it's just my gut instinct talking and your milage may vary.
Unfortunately this level of doubt precludes the normal level of moral outrage (aka, "hits" or "ad impressions") that these threads are supposed to generate, and for that I apologize.
Now, answer me this: How many RIAA lawyers does it take to screw in a light blub?
Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
...someone better explain to them what IANAL means before they start the sodomy lawsuits...
Trolling is a art,
These guys weren't randomly standing in line telling lawyer jokes. They purposely and continually go to courts and heckle the lawyers.
The pair said that for years they have stood outside courthouses on Long Island and mocked lawyers. The summary appears to inflame, when it shouldn't.
Slashdot Editors!
(Psst... make a "Law" category rather than stuff everything into YRO.)
Sorry for the rant, but what fool calls lawyers names to their faces?
Billy
I saw this story on Fark and for spite, everyone told their most offensive lawyer joke.
The easily offended should stop reading now.
A priest and a lawyer are walking down the street together when a young boy crosses their path. The priest says "hey, you wanna screw that boy?" To which the lawyer replies, "Out of what?"
Q: What's black and brown and looks good on a lawyer?
A: A doberman.
94% of Repubs and 21% of Dems voted to renew the Patriot Act
After all, just 90% of lawyers make the other 10% look bad...
Life is short; think quickly.
...I stick to dead baby jokes. Since they can't talk, they can't tattle on me.
In general, acting like an asshole in the presence of law enforcement is a bad idea. You may not get convicted, but chances are really good you will get arrested.
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
Wouldn't this be "Your Rights inline" ?
Q. How many lawyer jokes are there?
A. Two - the rest are all true stories.
-sid
Last time I checked, standing outside a courthouse expressing disdain for lawyers is perfectly legal.
In some states, they even allow people to carry signs and march around in circles outside of buildings. In fact, from time to time, these sign wielding people will even chant repetative slogans (gasp). My friend, people have a right to protest, be it against abortion, creationism, blacks, whites, gays, white supremacists and yes...lawyers.
Do I think these guys are stupid douchebags? Of course.
Am I outraged that they were arrested for being stupid douchebags? You bet your ass I am.
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
Q: How is a lawyer like a whore?
A: For the right money, either one will assume any position.
Q: Why do lawyers wear such tight collars?
A: So the foreskin doesn't show.
Q: What do you give a lawyer before he goes swimming?
A: An anchor.
--- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
Q: How many RIAA lawyers does it take to screw in a light blub?
A: We at the RIAA think we will never really know, as we are fairly sure that each lightbulb changed by a home internet user represents a lost lightbulb installation fee, which in turn affects the not just the RIAA lawyers but the Lighting Technicians and Carpenters and all the little people involved in music production to such an extent that we now have to over-task our lawyers to combat the menace of the Open Standard Lightbulb Organizations. Th pressure generated by these OSLOs, in turn, prevents us from determining the natural lawyer to lightbulb ratio. Until Congress acts to plug this fee-structure leakage with an appropriate rights management technology and enacts proper criminal penalties for circumvention of our natural right to control the exercise of the lightbulb changing task, we will be forced to file John Doe lawsuits in order to gain the suppoena power necessary to compel the lightbulb supply corporations with the names and addresses of their clearly infringing customers.
Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
--"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
How, exactly, were they "causing a disturbance"? Some people laughed? I mean, what exactly is the First Amendment about again? Did they yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater? I think not!
These boys weren't exercising their right to free speech. They were, deliberately and with malicious intent, making a public nuisance of themselves. And we have laws against that sort of thing.
I suspect the crowd of people in line were fine with the jokes...it offended one lawyer and the hammer came down. It is especially ironic given the "kings and peasants" analogy used in the article. (Did you read it BTW?)
The freedom of speech is not a freedom to be a shithead.
One person's shithead is another person's role model. THAT is the point of the first amendment. Just because you don't like it gives you no right to stop it. I mean, look at Jesse Jackson's marches through certain parts of the south...I guarantee that most people there think he's a shithead. However, he has the RIGHT to express his views.
Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
Score: -1 100% Flamebait
Lawyer: Stop calling me names or I will sue you!
Jock: Shut up or I will squash you!
Geek: Shut up or I will hack into your Xbox!
W: Shut up or I will invade you!
French: Shut up or I will propose a UN resolution against you!
SCO: Shut up or I will demand a licensing fee!
Boss: Shut up or I will outsource your job!
Microsoft: Shut up or I will create a competing product.....and subsidize it!
Slashdotter: Shut up or I will mod you down!
Goatse: Shut up or I will send your mom a special email!
Table-ized A.I.
Q: How many RIAA lawyers does it take to screw in a light blub?
A: RIAA lawyers don't have time to screw in lightbulbs, silly! They're too busy screwing 14 year old kids and their grandmothers...
So if I tell some blond jokes, does this mean some blonds will come and handcuff me?
The only thing that will stop you from fulfilling your dreams is you. - Tom Bradley
Stay on-topic by adding lawyer jokes here
If you read the article, try to discover what is actually fact. Notice how no uninvolved people were interviewed - we only have the statements of the pair and a court official. Each of these people will, of course, spin the event their way. The majority of that article is little better than editorializing - filling in with opinion where facts are lacking.
I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
Quote from the article:
... check out this choice list of problems with current law practice from the articleQ: What do a lawyer and a sperm have in common?
A: 1 in a million turns out to be a human being.
A wise man once told me that the right to free speech is not the freedom to say what you want. It is the freedom someone has to say things you don't want to hear.
This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
A lawyer wrote a will for an elderly lady. She asked the price and he said, "One hundred dollars, please." She gave him a crisp new $100 bill without noticing that a second $100 bill was stuck to it. Immediately, the lawyer faced an ethical dilemma: "Do I have to report this on my taxes?"
Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
These guys were arrested for making fun of our laughable judicial system. Need proof that our judicial system is laughable? These guys were arrested for making fun of...
Sorry, if it was in a court room during a trial, sure, but all these guys did wrong was piss off the wrong people. Article mentions they are part of an organization to promote better public access to the courts. Obviously these two were a thorn in a side or two. Arresting them is pure abuse of power just to make a point.
Send whiskey and fresh horses!