LSB Submitted To ISO/IEEE
mcneil@freestandards says: "The LSB has been submitted to ISO/IEEE for an ISO
imprimatur.
While this is not really new news, it is important
that every Linux user get involved to make sure their
country votes
YES for Linux ISO standardization!
With Linux achieving international standards
recognition it will be that much easier for
governments and other risk adverse organizations to
include Linux in their procurement policies. This of
course will further the normalization of free and open
source software, lessen the world's reliance on sucky
legacy platforms, etc. etc."
The LSB FAQ (for those whose first question was "What the heck is LSB?")
One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
You are confusing the packaging method with the management method. The LSB states that the standard package _type_ is rpm. APT is package type independent. It is most _famous_ because it is used in debian, however you can use apt to manage rpms also. I am not advocating either package type, I just wanted to clarify the confusion between a method of packaging programs and the management of said packages.
-- john