Slashdot Mirror


Intelsat Loses Another Satellite

Alarash writes "Intelsat reported a few days ago that its IS-804 Satellite is lost in space. According to the press release, the '[...] satellite experienced a sudden and unexpected electrical power system anomaly on January 14, 2005, at approximately 5:32 p.m. EST that caused the total loss of the spacecraft.' The satellite was in charge of the South Pacific's media delivery. As a reminder, Intelsat-7, another satellite from Intelsat, got lost a couple of months ago."

14 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Conspiracy Theory by Suchetha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    maybe someone doesn't want communications to happen. i think a powerful enough radio beam could fry the satellite. ideas?

    could this be a test bed for the newest extortion?? "give us the money or your satellite gets it"

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
    1. Re:Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Could be the Chinese doing live tests of their satellite killers on a target that won't cause an immediate war if they were detected.

  2. Gratuitously Off-Topic... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... but still space-related:

    New Titan panorama from Huygens! Complete with a worryingly Earth-like 'coastline' - I don't think anyone's decided if the dark areas actually contain any liquid or not, but still utterly intriguing. ;-)

    Oh, and now back to our scheduled broadcast. Satellite losses, not good. Big investment and all that, and long lead-time to launching replacements. Whatever!

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    1. Re:Gratuitously Off-Topic... by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I still believe Daniel Crotty's work on puzzling together those from their raw data was better. :-)

      His mosaics

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. Cause? by ceeam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it because of increased Solar activity? Can the real cause be ever discovered? If it's because of the Sun, can we have protective magnetic fields (akin to Earth's own) generated around our space vehicles in emergency? Like - if we ever go to Mars won't it be better to have active shielding instead of thick lead plating? (I know nothing)

  4. How about JCSAT-1B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmmm, curious. I'm assuming that this is NOT the same as the Japanese JCSAT-1B, operated by JSAT (a Japanese company). It has gone "out" as of today. Latest news is that a thruster broke down and it changed directions a bit. All communication channels are currently out cold. FYI, JCSAT-1B was built by Boeing. 3 satellites going out in just a couple months? Makes you think, no?

  5. Found another possible reason the satellites died by Rob+Carr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Intelsat only insures satellites worth $150 million or more. These sats were worth $73 million each, so they weren't insured.

    For those of us who moved out of our parent's basement, it's a far too-well known phenomenon.

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  6. Evil Accountants? by FEEBLE*BMX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So let me get this straight. Their satellite fries and they just transfer everyone over to unused bandwidth on their other satellites. Then they declare a $73 million dollar loss on their taxes. Does this fall into fiscal 2004 or 2005?

  7. Re:Correct my physics! by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Sun puts out 1368 W/m^2 at Earth's orbit, so I don't think your hypothetical laser would even be noticed.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  8. Re:Possible Reasons for satellite loss by _Hellfire_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could it have been the tin-whiskers phenomena? I could imagine a tin-whisker growing out, shorting across two critical circuits and there you have it, one dark satellite.

    I got asked by a customer recently how come satellites can stay up there for 20+ years without failure and their PC can blow a power supply after 3 months of use. I said "Your power supply didn't cost 3 million dollars."

    "Oh."

    --
    "And then I visited Wikipedia ...and the next 8 hours are a blur..."
  9. Re:Found another possible reason the satellites di by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, there could be another reason... Quoth the same article:

    "Under the terms of the Transaction Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation for the sale of Intelsat dated August 16, 2004, among Intelsat, Ltd., Intelsat (Bermuda), Ltd., Zeus Holdings Limited (Zeus Holdings), Zeus Merger One Limited and Zeus Merger Two Limited, the total loss of the IS-804 satellite gives Zeus Holdings the right to not consummate the acquisition of Intelsat. Zeus Holdings has advised Intelsat that it is evaluating the impact of the IS-804 failure."

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  10. Re:This picture just in... by GQuon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Speaking of that scene ... why don't we ever hear about the satellite that is filming the capture? Or are the images provided by a high-powered telescope on the moon?

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  11. possumsat by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Others have suggested that some of these "lost" satellites are merely being delivered to the CIA, NSA, DIA or other covert agency (perhaps not American). Especially if they're backups, silent until needed in a crisis, they'd be probably impossible to easily detect as working. And it's much more expensive for antisatellite weapons to target every "dead" satellite in orbit on the chance that a few are just playing dead for a new master.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:possumsat by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lets rule out American organizations. Why?:
      With the funding they get and the clout they possess, they can have any number of satellites without our knowledge floating around in space. Hell they are probably watching your pr0n collection over your shoulder RIGHT now!

      As for foreign countries - if they are capable of hijacking a satellite, you would think they would be capable of sending one up on their own. Not like "evil" countries don't already have their own satellites.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.