'Economist' Calls For Open WiFi Specs
DavidNWelton writes "An interesting and well thought-out call for Wifi manufacturers to open up their specs, at least partially, written by The Economist. 'So it is hard to see what the problem is beyond a dog-in-the-mangerish desire not to give anything away. Time to open it up, boys.'"
I demand open wifi goggles.
freeminimacs, just becau
So patent infringing Linux hackers can illegally hack into wireless networks? Face it. Wireless has already got several problems, with Linux users already illegally hacking drivers, without making it "click and hack" for them.
If this gets -1, then its true as -1 posts are the most authoritive and insightful posts on Slashdot that are actually worth reading.
This was in the Economist two weeks ago, and in other IT sources (e.g. the Register) a week ago. This is "Olds for Nerds".
Other news:
Hey, white boi! I really like pale American teenagers with small penissess.
Why don't you come over and give me a good tittyfucking?
--
CowboiKneel
To download the [klerck.org]? GNNA and support the above ais far
I've been building and running Linux servers since 1998, and even I had trouble configuring a Linux notebook (FC3). It was a terrible experience, I love having a Linux desktop but there's no way it's ready for consumers. Part of the problem is the Linux device driver model: 1) there are too many Linux kernels (how many XP kernels? One), and 2) kernel drivers generally require source. To install my wireless card I spent 3 days trying to get ndiswrapper working, finally I gave up and used the closed-source linuxant driverloader. All I can tell you is that Linux is going to have a terrible time connecting to kernel-level devices if it insists on needing source for the drivers and drivers matched to every sub-kernel. It's not realistic.
in a h3ad spin8ing