Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Google Trials A9 Style Image Search

Posted by samzenpus on from the be-careful-what-you-search-for dept.

Grugnog writes "Google has started including images from it's image search on the main search page. This is similar to Amazon's A9 search engine. With Google kicking off Google Print (A9's other specialty) could A9 become redundant?"

9 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. NSFW by kdark1701 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So what if pornographic images pop up? Say I search for my friend's name, and then there's porn thumbnails across the screen. Not good for those of us who use google in public.

    1. Re:NSFW by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 5, Funny

      The girls' names usually led to porn sites. Come to think of it, that must be have been kind of hurtful when the girls see how they are just seen as sex objects

      Give it up, berk. There are no girls here on slashdot, so that fake sensitivity crap will get you nowhere.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  2. elaborate scam? by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    *****************
    domain: GRUGNOG.COM
    owner-address: Owen Barton
    owner-address: 14 Parc Derwen
    owner-address: Glan Conwy
    owner-address: LL28 5BZ
    owner-address: Colwyn Bay
    owner-address: United Kingdom
    *****************

    when you use normal google there's no pics. then there's no explanation wtf is this grugnog.com

    and there's no pics on normal google... which is good. pics suck most of the time when you're looking for information in TEXT.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:elaborate scam? by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      flamebait? wtf? how is it flamebait pointing out that the SITE IS NOT GOOGLES? it's all public information anyways.

      the site might have worked for 10 secs, that i could admit. but it sure as hell has nothing to do with official google. such a search frontend, like a9, that included images as well would be pretty easy to implement with googleapi.

      so at best some guy coded his 'own' crappy version of a9, at worst he just hand made the html for whatever reason, maybe he's trying to score on the googleads there. ....but one thing is 99.99% sure: THE FUCKING NEWS POST IS FRAUDALENT.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  3. Re:Ummm... by game+kid · · Score: 5, Informative
    ummm... i'm not getting pictures....

    me neither. I, and certainly keeleysam, feel duped and disappointed.

    The posted link is not Google though it seems genuine; its much larger home page is, in fact, a blog.

    Makes me glad to have a status bar on my browser.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  4. More info by grugnog · · Score: 5, Interesting
    For what it's worth, the magic word is trials. Google doesn't release a new feature to everyone at once - specific subnets will see the feature first. Even I only see this with a search for 'traktor' - other searches just look the same.

    Maybe others in the /. herd can verify if they get this?

    ...I am redirecting to mirrordot to avoid server meltdown :)

    --
    Grugnog
  5. Re:FAKE! FAKE! FAKE! by LocoSpitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not necessarily fake. Here's why you wouldn't link to it: As noted by numerous posters in this thread, and also on a Slashdot FPP just days ago, Google oftentimes rolls out features only to specific subnets. If you're not in that subnet, you don't get to see the feature.

    Since the majority of people are unable to see this new feature, it only makes sense to offer a screenshot.

    Everyone who thinks this is an elaborate hoax, or that the mirror was intended to be seen as an actual Google.com page, is reading waaaay too much into this.

  6. Re:Ummm... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Funny

    I... feel duped

    No, no, no... that comes later. Possibly as early as tomorrow.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  7. Re:dumb question by l3v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You mean Google doing web search, A9 using Google's web and image search results to enhance (their word) the results, now Google doing search which you/they/whatever say it's a copy of A9's. Now, stop that, I'm spinning. From the beginning A9 was a results ripoff with it's own interface. If they have something really worth using, that should do us (users) just good and fine, a little competitiveness can never hurt (if you leave MS out of it, that is :P ).

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.