Printing XML: Why CSS Is Better than XSL
An anonymous contributor writes "XML.com just published an article titled Printing XML: Why CSS Is Better than XSL written by Michael Day and Håkon Wium Lie. The article was written in response to Norm Walsh's claim that CSS will never fix [printing]. Did you hear me? CSS will never fix it!. The article shows how a 100-line CSS style sheet gives you the same formatted version of W3C's Webarch as the 1000-line XSL style sheet by using Prince."
How do I propose they do that? Easy.
Step 1: Purchase the bullwhip.
Step 2: Firmly grasp bullwhip
Step 3: Purchase a ticket to Redmond, Wa
Step 4: Start swinging!
This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
Free for any purpose eh? This will go well for the interface to my baby mulching machine.
I mean /. topics usually contain several links, but that is just link overload...
an article titled Printing XML: Why CSS Is Better than XSL written by Michael Day and Håkon Wium Lie. The article was written in response to Norm Walsh's claim that CSS will never fix [printing]. Did you hear me? CSS will never fix it!".
Let the hair pulling and the name calling begin.
In nice, big text. Way to hold the the XSL fort, guys!
Jeremy
Looking for a Python IRC bot?
That's no enforcement, that's $250 a hour!
Oh, did I just make a silly comment? Sorry... (again)
"Piter, too, is dead."
http://zengarden.20megsfree.com/
Actually, if the W3 had a 50 million dollars prize for the first fully CSS1+2+3 compliant browser, people would fall over themselves to build the browser.
"Piter, too, is dead."
Two competing technical ideas so that everyone can line up behind one or the other and argue which is better.
I'm really tired of seeing everyone here just politely agreeing with one another in such a single-minded way.
Ever since the debates over vi/emacs, linux/windows, tastes great/less filling, etc. were all settled, there just haven't been any good arguments here.