Apple and Pepsi Do it Again
memoryhole writes "It seems the old Apple/Pepsi team are at it again with an iTunes promotion, or will be very soon -- they'll even notify you by email when it starts. Odds: 1 in 3, this time across the whole line of Pepsi products, including Mountain Dew and Sierra Mist. Maybe this time they'll actually have some in my area."
in the first promotion, you could cheat by tilting the bottle to look at the cap before purchasing. did they fix this? (which would be good in some sense because they'd have to put more soda in there...)
they didn't mention it for some reaosn, but you can also expect one ipod mini per hour given away. (of course, the odds are probably pretty awful if you do the math). still, pretty cool.
i think they're nuts for not including the ipod shuffle as part of the giveaway with this, with a higher chance than a mini maybe?
- tristan
Interesting change in the rules:
- 10 redemptions per day
- 200 redemptions total
fine print
I guess this is 10 in 24 hrs, 200 total per iTMS account, not physical person, as a jr/sr may live in the same house and each have an iTMS account.
This should also prevent unintended use of the promotion.
I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
I hope they use birth control cause those would be some ugly kids.
but you will be a minority, i'm fairly sure. many will go through with the iTMS process - afterall, it's "free."
Mod you +97 INFORMATIVE.
Thank you for providing the exact same link that was in the summary. You are truly a master of this new-fangled interweb hyperlinking thing.
Your family must be proud.
---
You could have at least pointed out that the rules state that the giveaway is for people who redeem the caps, not for just entering your email in the box. See item 7 in the sweepstakes rules
It's actually a slightly improved campaign...
0 000000-itunes-and-a-bunch-of-silver-ipod-minis/
I documented the details on MacVillage.net summarizing how it works:
http://macvillage.net/news/archives/2005/01/18/20
It's a pretty cool campaign. Odds are you'll end up with something if you buy 3 pepsi's (or other products). And just that 1 chance gets you a bunch of chances at a free iPod mini.
The iPod is branded for Pepsi... so you can most likely get a little extra for it on eBay... since there's a lot of coke/pepsi collectors out there.
That is if you don't want (or already have) an iPod.
Now this time they've spiked the deal by the inclusion of drawings for special edition (has the Pepsi logo) iPod Minis, so that skews the calculation, but only very slightly.
A Call for Open Standards
You're forgetting something: You can still burn a CD from iTunes, and then rip it into whatever format you like. Lock-in isn't even an issue to me. Which do I trust more: A lock-in to what is in the end, Microsoft and it's Windows Media format, or to Apple with its FairPlay-DRM'd AAC?
Napster, along with pretty much every other if iTunes' competitors all use Windows Media -- somehow using Windows Media is more 'open'? There is absolutely nothing about Windows Media that is published, other than how to access and use its libraries. Apple's format has only the DRM unpublished (officially, anyway); the rest is AAC -- a standardized, published format.
Frankly, both aren't the optimum, but I'm far less comfortable with Microsoft holding the leash, and every music purchase from the array of Windows Media hawkers being controlled by Microsoft. I've tried buying music from a Windows Media store, and due to the lousy way Microsoft did WMA's DRM, I lost over $50 in music that is completely unplayable, claiming that I don't have the proper liscence, even though I backed up my 'licence' files, etc. That music store was not at all interested in customer service...
I honestly get sick of people who try to say that choosing an even more proprietary solution is the 'open' way -- espescially when that proprietary solution is Microsoft. Windows Media stores don't offer choice; they are even more restricting than iTunes. I've tried both, and iTunes is easily and handily the best, most 'open' method available. The only difference between Apple and Microsoft's way is that Apple is much more selective in whom can sell products with the 'black box' that decodes iTunes music (Apple and HP). Microsoft was far less discriminating in that respect; but the end result is the same in both cases: The black box is still entirely closed...
They are both closed systems. But I'm willing to live with iTunes, as it's the best solution available at the present time.
-- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.