Cell Architecture Explained
IdiotOnMyLeft writes "OSNews features an article written by Nicholas Blachford about the new processor developed by IBM and Sony for their Playstation 3 console. The article goes deep inside the Cell architecture and describes why it is a revolutionary step forwards in technology and until now, the most serious threat to x86. '5 dual core Opterons directly connected via HyperTransport should be able to achieve a similar level of performance in stream processing - as a single Cell. The PlayStation 3 is expected to have have 4 Cells.'"
Nicholas Blachford is an idiot. Do not read any of his articles. Just to give you the best of Nicholas, read his antigravity article and visit his web site:
;)
http://www.blachford.info/quantum/gravity.html
Also, look at the nose pictures of him
http://www.blachford.info/other/me.html
Seriously, the guy has burned most of his sane braincells.
For serious laugh, read his article series 'building the next generation' from osnews. I really got good laughs from that 4 part series.
Also, it didn't take long to spot a totally idiotic statement from todays slashdotted article:
> Parallel programming is usually complex but in this case the OS will look at the
> resources it has and distribute tasks accordingly, this process does not
> involve re-programming.
Here Nicholas misses the core problem of parallel programming. The program algorithms _always_ have to made parallel. The OS can't do it.