Slashdot Mirror


Big Money Comes Out for the Inauguration

randall_burns writes "Open Secrets is running an interesting story about major donors to Bush's inauguration. The founder of Dell is one of the high rollers funding Bush's party."

7 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. Money is bad by SimianOverlord · · Score: 3, Funny

    Such is the corrupt grip that monied interests have on our nations leaders and senators, it seems the only way to solve this problem comes down to two choices. 1)Allow public funding of political parties or 2) make every wannabee politician take a vow of poverty, like church leaders did back in the Dark Ages. Of the two, the latter is the only sensible option.

    The first leads down the road to chaos, as every splintered faction appears quite literally from the woodwork, holding their hand out for tax dollars to advertise their presence and garner votes. With the constitution being what it is, this is a dangerous charter for extremists, as a white supremist organisation (for example) would be just as eligible for public funds as a major political party, and one can only assume, would use those funds to push their hateful agenda. I can see Californica, in particular, as the worst hit by this sort of proposal, as it has more than its fair share of cults, drawn by the bright sunlight and fine oranges.

    Yet happily another option exists to go back to the glory days of rule by disinterested self-abasing, self sacrificing people like Mother Theresa. Let's face it, if you still wanted to be a politician after being told you would live a life of abject poverty, living day by day on scraps scavenged from kitchen bins, only the truly motivated would stay in the profession. A similar system could be put in place for the law profession. Just a thought.

    --
    Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    1. Re: Money is bad by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


      > Such is the corrupt grip that monied interests have on our nations leaders and senators, it seems the only way to solve this problem comes down to two choices. 1)Allow public funding of political parties or 2) make every wannabee politician take a vow of poverty, like church leaders did back in the Dark Ages. Of the two, the latter is the only sensible option.

      A third option would be to hand over the money to someone who would spend it wisely, such as me.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Money is bad by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      People who were responsible for bringing us Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, the Euro and find Jerry Lewis an David Hasselhoff brilliant have no place pointing fingers at Americans; accusing stupidity. There's enough idiocy to go around the globe.

    3. Re:Money is bad by SimianOverlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      It isn't irrational of the Britons at all. Millions of Americans and others visit Britain just to catch a glimpse of a bunch of toffs in their palace, offsetting the horrendous expense of having them with tourist revenue. Really the whole thing is just a sham - everyone in Britain knows this. The real royal family died in 1943 during a bomb raid and a family of actors were employed to take their place. The actor who plays Charles is simply brilliant. We're all just waiting for the Aussies to finally work it out.

      --
      Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    4. Re:Money is bad by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      You gave us "Waiting for god" and other crappy shows, you bastards.

      Of course, you also gave us Eddie Izzard so . . . You break even. ;)

  2. Re:What's the point? by tdemark · · Score: 3, Funny
    Is there something special we're supposed to be inferring?

    According to most TV reports and newspapers, any of the following should be fine:
    • Bush is a bad president because this money, which was donated by citizens and corporations explicitly for the inauguration, should go to the tsunami victims
    • Bush is a bad president because this money, which was donated by citizens and corporations explicitly for the inauguration, should go to the Iraq war
    • Bush is a bad president because his inauguration total was around $40 mil, while Clinton was a good president because his '93 inauguration was only $33 million.
    • Bush stole the election


    - Tony
  3. funding Bush's party? rather... by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 2, Funny
    funding a lunatic.


    "We have a calling from beyond the stars to stand for freedom, and America will always be faithful to that cause."


    I once worked at a mental home; there, you could pick up sentences like that all the time. You know, people hearing voices, callings from the Great Beyond and stuff. Scary.

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.