Slashdot Mirror


Michael Powell to Leave FCC

Anonymous Slashdotter writes "Michael Powell, chairman of the FCC, will be stepping down from his post soon. 'Powell, who maintained a light regulatory hand as the nation's chief media watchdog but collected some of the largest indecency fines against U.S. broadcasters, planned to issue a statement Friday but was not expected to hold a formal news conference, these officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity.'"

17 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Praise Bob by zeke-o · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of course, his replacement might be even worse ..

  2. I have a sinking feeling.... by tinrobot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That his replacement will be even worse.

    Don't celebrate just yet.

    1. Re:I have a sinking feeling.... by Johnny5000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, yes, but a vote for Kerry was a vote for split government, and a vote for split government is a vote for gridlock and lack of "progress".

      You say that like it's a bad thing... if "progress" is an advancement of the neo-con Republican party agenda, and lack of progress is blocking that from happening, I'd love to see some of that gridlock.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  3. FCC is for regulation of frequencies, not content. by Slime-dogg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least, that was the original design. Someone needs to take them to court over the 1st ammendment. If someone's sign language is governed by free speech, then it follows that the broadcasts should also be governed by the same. They both travel over electro magnetic waves, right?

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  4. Michael Powell is the son of Colin Powell by nganju · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if Colin Powell's exodus is not unrelated to this.

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
  5. Too harsh by numLocked · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you all are too harsh on my man Mikey P.

    He heads an organization that is ostensibly about regulating new technologies, but employs almost 10 times as many lawyers as engineers, and the average age of the engineers is quite high (in the 40s, if memory serves). He has done a surprisingly good job of staying moderate in terms of amount of regulation. He generally knows when to stay out of the fray, and has been quick to officially adopt standards that have been cemented internationally.

    He really has an impossible job, and I think he has been doing as well as anyone could have expected.

  6. Vonage might not exist today w/o Powell. by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last year, Powell repeatedly shielded VoIP services from intrusive government regulation and taxation. The FCC voted in February that Internet-only VoIP services were not subject to FCC oversight and expanded that view in November to protect VoIP from state regulators. ...

    "He let us go out and build this new thing without knowing all the issues beforehand," said Jeff Citron, chief executive of Vonage, the largest U.S. provider of Internet telephone services. "He helped the telephone industry transition from the old to the new world."

    Cellphone number portability, Do Not Call list, he's pushed hard to free up more spectrum for WiFi.

    But he's republican so let's focus on the stuff we don't like.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Vonage might not exist today w/o Powell. by bushidocoder · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Not to mention that he sides with Tivo and the consumers every time the content industry came calling, with the exception of the copy bit, which although he allowed to be implemented, did not fully standardize. When the NFL complained that TivoToGo violated their decades long control over their market with blackout dates, he ruled in favor of the consumer. He never interfered with cables versus satellite's ability to compete with each other fairly. He sat back and let the markets push broadband into almost every willing home with very limitted regulation. He expanded the available bandwidth for wireless carriers at a low cost, ensuring that even with the recent corporate mergers, there's still 5 major carriers for consumers to choose from.

      We may not like everything he did, but I agree - lets give the man some credit for leading the only part of government to not completely screw emerging technologies.

  7. Re:nice to see a failure to mention... by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Insightful
    HDTV is one of the biggest screws ever put to the american public! Forcing the replacement of hundreds of MILLIONS of working TV's and equipment so the FCC can auction off the spectrum? It's a payday for everyone involved except the US public.

    Companies get to: Sell tons of new TVs, DVD players/Recorders and Tuners (yours isn't compatible anymore!), implement DRM (I can't wait until someone goes to jail for recording Enterprise), and the FCC gets to auction off a prime piece of the specturm for an ungodly sum.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  8. Re:I for one... by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny, I heard it when it first happened. Powell sounded articulate and reasoned; Stern sounded like a buffoon. While what Powell was saying may still have been disagreeable, he didn't attack Stern personally, whereas that is all Stern did.

    Riveting? Hardly.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  9. Re:What does Howard Stern Say? by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    . My own view is that there are two buttons on a radio or television -- one changes the channel, the other one turns it off. Use them, monitor what your children listen to/watch and don't expect the government to babysit for you.

    The Jackson incident is a glaring example of why that doesn't work, when normally I'd agree.

    If I don't want my kids listening to or watching Stern, it's easy enough to lock them out of the E! channel when his show comes on.

    But, no one expected to see that kind of shit during the Superbowl half-time show. The problem is the Superbowl was rated for all ages.

    It pissed a lot of people off, and don't go off on some "well in Europe its ok.." rant. To many, it would be like going to McDonalds, and having them serve your kids vodka in their Happy Meals. People also knew it wasn't an accident, it was dead obvious that it wasn't. It was some washed up old skank trying to be shocking and prop up her failing career.

    I'm all for leaving it up to the people, and a ratings system. If a show says they're rated for all ages, and then start cussing and showing nudity, they should be fined because IMO that's fraud.

    The TV industry has been hammering the point that we pay by watching commercials lately. Fine, I accept that. Then if you advertise your program as rated all ages, and I pay for it by watching your commercials, and then you cross the line into adult content, well in the marketplace we call behavior like that a bait and switch.

    What they did was wrong, and whether or not you personally were offended isn't the point.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  10. Re:Stern.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, it's not conservative/religious/etc. Remember Tipper Gore? She was laregly responsible for the explicit lyrics warning lables on music. Tipper Gore is not conservative at all from a political standpoint, she is known as a liberal. Conservative, liberal, they're all a bunch of Bill of Rights hating fools. I am becoming convinced that the sole purpose of the US government is to stifle to people, crush innovation, buy our food, and think for us. Any idiot across the whole right to left wing spectrum is capable of being worse than Michael Powell. Bush and Kerry are exactly the same, but that's another topic.

  11. Re:What does Howard Stern Say? by Marco_polo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't forget the bill that is sitting on presiden't desk. The one that will allow the FCC to fine 'individual radio personalities'. I'm all for moderate regulation of our airways, but going after the actors/DJ's is a dangerous precedent.

    --
    I am the lord of the pun. Dance Knave!
  12. Re:What does Howard Stern Say? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hardly anyone saw it during the superbowl -- her breast was flashed for a couple of seconds.

    Most children spend their first months or years sucking on their mother's breast. Its no big deal anyway.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  13. Re:his vision by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On the one hand, people complain about the FCC slapping fines on large corporations for broadcasting media that they deem "inappropriate". Then in the very same breath, they complain about the FCC supporting large corporations.

    If the FCC was truly all about supporting large networks, they would allow them to appeal to the ever-increasing moral decadence of our society completely unharrassed. After all, isn't that how large, successful corporations got to where they are today? They are in the business of selling a product that the public wants. If that happens to be smut, then they will push the envelope as far as they can until the free market or the FCC says enough is enough.

    --
    But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
  14. Which is worse by adewolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok so which is worse nakid breast or some guy's head being chopped in. Personally I would rather my daughter see the breast than the chopped in head. The FCC seems perfectly happy with kids watching extreme violence but get's all disgruntled over band language (so what) or a nakid body part. Makes me wonder. Alex

    --
    "The Brady Bunch is back...working homicide"
  15. Re:nice to see a failure to mention... by Big_Al_B · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah! It's the same as when the phone company went to touch tone and my pulse phones didn't work anymore! Oh, wait...

    Look, your TV isn't going to be useless anytime soon. Heck, that day is so far out that it'll probably break before then anyhow.

    Relax. No one has suggested that everyone discards their TV on any give date. The regulatory date given to TV stations to upgrade their signal doesn't mean they'll terminate analog broadcasts that day too.

    I have an old TV that only has RF in, but this trivially cheap dongle let's me watch cable in the garage. I won't be taking it to the transfer station until it cacks.

    And what does HD broadcasting have to do with DVD player/recorders? I don't get what your beef is.