No Money For Hubble Service Mission
starexplorer writes "SPACE.com is reporting that the White House has eliminated funding for servicing the Hubble Space Telescope from its 2006 budget request. After many options 1, 2 were explored, is this the death knell for Hubble?"
As soon as it gets to the point where it becomes a re-entry risk (which happens when only one gyro remains functional), NASA will drop it into the Pacific. They don't want to risk an unplanned, uncontrolled descent that may put it in the middle of a population area.
You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
Not to mention Hubble and JWST don't see all the same frequencies on the radiation spectrum, so even once JWST goes up, we won't be able to see everything Hubble could.
The JWST was meant to complement the Hubble, not replace it. It functions almost entirely in the infrared range, whereas Hubble covers a very wide range of wavelengths. The JWST was intended to fill in one of the HST's weak points.
You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
Yes, a newer and better one is on the horizon. The James Webb Space Telescope is scheduled to launch in 2011.
More like a new and different one. If you actually compare the two you'd notice that the JWST doesn't see everything the HST can, not even close to the same wide range of spectrum. It sees primarily in IR.
- AMW
In other words, this could just be a gambit to drum up support and funding from congress.