Slashdot Mirror


Open 3D Scientific Visualization Toolkit

Mark Leaman writes "The Science Museum of Minnesota has just announced an online community site for scientific visualization, including thier Open 3D Visualization Toolkit that includes Blender and the GIMP as part of the core development tools. Frustrated with a lack of consolidated resources and discussion about open-source, scientific visualization development tools, the Science Museum of Minnesota's Learning Technologies Department decided to develop their own."

17 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Never would have happened without govt help by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These museums, with very few exceptions are almost purely supported with government funds. They just can't make back the cost of upkeep, much less salaries, on the few dollars they make through admission fees.

    There are a few that can make ends meet by appealing to private business, but for the most part these museums are supported with public money.

    Now the point of all this government talk is that sometimes it takes the government to do something good and worthwhile for the general public. If it were up to the private sector, such an undertaking would 1) not have been undertaken in the first place and 2) if it were developed, it wouldn't have been released as OSS.

    Hooray for these hackers! And thank god they've got an enlightened government supporting them.

    1. Re:Never would have happened without govt help by ManoMarks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's because most universities in the U.S. at least have turned to public/private ventures and patents to bring in more revenues. This has many benefits, including placing students in nice jobs, but the downside is an increased focus on doing what the private sector wants.

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    2. Re:Never would have happened without govt help by siskbc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One thing that always disappoints me is the lack of involvement of Academia in helping OSS

      Don't know what you're talking about, really. Check the sciences, almost all OSS is academic. The OSS tools I use for research were all made my students or profs or multi-university collabortations. If you mean big projects that solve non-academic problems, like spreadsheets and word processors - well, why should researchers (outside of CS people perhaps) involve themselves with that?

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  2. Re:K-POW by HardeH · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe you should give VTK, OpenDX, VisIT or Paraview a try, all of which are just some of the scientific visualisation community's tools of choice (and hey, they're OSS, mostly cross-platform as well).

  3. Re:K-POW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should take a look at VPython -- Simplest 3-D visualization that I know of (and it runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux).

    http://www.vpython.org/

  4. Open Data by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where is the repository for open scientific data for visualization? The NASA website of raw data decoded from the streams sent by our probes? The USGS GPS models? CAT/MRI scan files from dead people? X-ray crystallography data from public research institutions? Their CD distro is a good start, with models from their Turkish dig site. Without data, this tool is just a toy.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Open Data by pedroloco · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as NASA planetary datasets go, try the Planetary Data System

      Some of the USGS topo datasets are available from the EROS Data Center. Some free datasets are available for download.

  5. Not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Frustrated with a lack of consolidated resources and discussion about open-source, scientific visualization development tools

    This the point where I remind people of OpenDX, which is the open sourced IBM Visualization Data Explorer. DX used to be an extremely expensive commercial product, but it's been open source for a couple of years now.

    It's very good. If you're into scientific visualization it's worth examining.

  6. Re:Come on, can't we have a autogenerator for VRML by deepsky · · Score: 2, Informative
    > VRML is a proprietary, closed model

    Proprietary? VRML is an ISO/IEC standard.

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. GIMP kicks Photoshop... by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Until you wake up and have to do graphics for a *living*.. Not just simple hobby stuff at home.

    Don't get me wrong, GIMP can do nice things, but it does not replace photoshop for professional production work.

    Will it someday ? Who knows.. just not today.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:GIMP kicks Photoshop... by lxs · · Score: 3, Funny

      I suggest that they just rename it to GINP (GINP Is Not Photoshop) and end this discussion once and for all.

  9. Blender is not a Sci Viz tool, but these are... by hawkstone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but I fail to see what Blender and the GIMP have to do with real scientific visualization. Blender is for 3D modelling, and the GIMP is for image processing.

    If you're looking for complete, open source scientific visualization and data analysis packages, try VisIt, which supports dozens of input formats and runs on Linux, Windows, and MacOSX. Pick it up at http://www.llnl.gov/visit, or get the latest binaries from FTP here.

    I have less knowledge of ParaView, but it is also free: http://www.paraview.org.

    Both of these are also developed in part by the national labs; they can run parallel to handle terabytes of data, so if you've got small dataset they should be smokin' fast, and if you've got your own cluster you should be able to visualize some huge data.

    If you're looking for just a toolkit to build your own application, try OpenDX or VTK.

  10. The following software is available: by Wills · · Score: 3, Informative

    Open-source Visualisation software:

    "[We, the Science Musuem of Minnesota,] are frustrated by a lack of consolidated resources and discussion about open-source, scientific visualization development tools"

    Counter-examples:
    1. Re:The following software is available: by drauh · · Score: 2, Informative

      MayaVi is also quite nice. And it's Python.

      --
      This is a tautology.
  11. OpenDX and MayaVI by Noksagt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think OpenDX is a bit more than just a tool-kit. It also has a great GUI for doing visualization, without the need for too much coding (somewhat analagous to LabView, I suppose). I have found I really like MayaVI, which is a GUI for VTK. MayaVI/VTK are python scriptable, which is great.

  12. Re:Come on, can't we have a autogenerator for VRML by luwandah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually there is an open viewer for molecules. It's called Rasmol http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/ and many source files can be downloaded from their site.