Cloudscape Gains Momentum
A reader writes: "There's been a lot of bits written recently about the growth of Open Source databases; as well as IBM's patent gift, as their release of the Java database Cloudscape. There's a contest running on SourceForge.net around Cloudscape; download and run with it." SF.net is part of OSTG, like Slashdot.
wouldn't it be quicker to print your data on paper and sort it by hand ?
As it happens I've already written a review of cloudscape; the google cache of it is here.
Brief summary: get the Apache version; reasonably full SQL92 syntax; performance OK; a bit lacking on security.
I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
I'm a Java developer, and have been almost from the very start of Java. While I tend to agree with you at first, I would like to point out some benefits of using Cloudscape.
Over the years I've had a few (small, hobby) projects, where I really felt the need for a database which did not need to be fast nor did it need to be huge. So I tried Cloudscape. And while it isn't the fastest around, it gets the job done.
The easiest part is that you can just bundle it with your application, without writing a single line of code!
I've tried MySQL, but I still need to install it prior to being able to run my application - no need for that with Cloudscape.
But, granted, it is not the fastest out there. If I need a *real* database, I just use Oracle.
Embedding a database in an application can be very useful, such as in a desktop GUI where you cannot rely on network communication or maybe don't want to bother with a client/server environment.
I'd certainly consider Java/Cloudscape for a desktop db-backed application over anything built in Access.
As always, fit the tool to the job, not the job to the tool.
Java VM's can out-perform cpp over n cycles, where n is sufficient to overcome Java start times (seconds)
:/
Yes, and a well-supplied tortoise can out-distance a rocket over n years, where n is much longer than the rocket's burn time