Slashdot Mirror


Sun Grants Access to 1,600+ Patents

Insane_zoD writes "Looks like Sun is attempting to keep up with IBM in opening up patents for FOSS-based projects. From the news release: 'By giving open source developers free access to Sun OpenSolaris related patents under the Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), the company is fostering open innovation and establishing a leadership role in the framework of a patent commons that will be recognized across the globe.'"

10 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. Where is the license? by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where is the license? All I see is a press release with vague language and much arm-waving. As I read the press release, the patents are only available for work in OpenSolaris (which as of now does not exist yet - only DTrace). Or work under the CDDL. Or both. Nowhere do I see a statement that says "use these patents with any OSI-approved licensed project, or indeed any clear statement as to right of use.

    Looks like there are some strings attached.

    --
    People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
    1. Re:Where is the license? by Halo1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No matter what happens with SCO's malicious patent crusade
      SCO is saying nothing about patents, their lawsuit is about copyright. IBM did countersue based on (software) patent infringement, but that was just to pester them back, and has in se nothing to do with the SCO allegations.
      --
      Donate free food here
  2. Free like "Write code for us and we won't pay you" by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These patents can't be used in any code other than OpenSolaris.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  3. Armsrace? by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now this is a war I could enjoy. Sun & IBM in an armsrace on who is going to free the most patents. I hope other companies don't want to be left out and start participating...

  4. Translation: by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take my patents freely. Sue me for violating your patents (rightfuly or not) and you can't use my patents anymore.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  5. Re:Not as good as IBM by Halo1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    IBM opened the 500 patents it opened without restriction.
    No, they didn't. The restriction is that their license is only valid for open source. I may be a less strict restriction than Sun's, but it still is an important one.
    --
    Donate free food here
  6. IBM by dolo666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are just following IBM and yet somehow I don't think Sun is grasping the true sense of Open Source. IBM's 500 out of 40000 patents is a good start, and the fact they are open to anyone doing open source is right where the spirit of open source remains fixed.

    Sun's trying to grab the brass ring without really putting their best foot forward, IMHO. This is a ploy to get people using Solaris, and therefore I think it's stupid.

  7. Re:GPL compatible? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You got it the wrong way around, they ARE compatable with the GPL, but the GPL isnt compatable with them (IE you can take BSDLed code and use it in a GPL codebase, but you cant take GPLed code and use it in a BSDL codebase).

  8. Novell is still in first place on this by originalhack · · Score: 3, Insightful
    While it is nice to see IBM and Sun jumping on the bandwagon and it is a really cool gesture, the real benefit of a patent portfolio is when it can be used to force another company to cross-license. If IBM (or Sun) were to take the position that any company that initates a sleazy IP attack against an OSS project may find itself defending against IBM's entire patent portfolio, that would be very useful.

    Perhaps, Novell would be willing to let IBM and Sun "copy" this

  9. Re:Patents can be enforced against Linux by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I agree, their participation so far appears to be cynical and they seem to intend to operate as a "spoiler", fragmenting the Open Source community rather than supporting it. Otherwise, we would see them dual-licensing with CDDL and GPL, and their patents wouldn't be barred from use in Linux.

    OpenOffice should be second in importance only to the Linux kernel among Open Source developers. And yet it has almost no developer community - IMO due to Sun's conduct. It's not clear that Sun has learned anything from that.

    Bruce