Slashdot Mirror


Bridging India's Digital Divide With Linux

Kinnu provides a pointer to this story about India's increasing use of Linux. They mention a battlefield PDA running Linux, making Linux the standard OS for students, and some more about the Simputer.

14 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. If they can do it, why can't we! by untwisted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sort of thing really needs to hit america. Its really hard to convince americans (even computer science students) to even look at linux. They have windows so pounded in to their heads they won't even look at something else. I'm glad that the rest of the world is starting to pick up the ball though, eventually we won't be able to avoid it here in america (unless it ends up like the poor, poor metric system)

    --
    --untwisted
    1. Re:If they can do it, why can't we! by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I have a brand new iMac and a powerbook. I would not say it's "better" than linux. I also have a linux x64 system that is faster, alot cheaper (home built) and the interface (KDE) in my opinion is just as easy as the Mac. My wife and kids found adjusting to kde easier than the shift to Mac. OSX is a nice operating system, but it is not perfect, there is no perfect OS for everyone everywhere. OSX is not better than Linux, it's just different. You can take a person who has mastered Office 2000 on Windows and watch them get totally befuddled on OSX. There is still a learning curve and the curve is less going from windows to kde in my experience, mileage may vary. After several months my family still leave programs running on the Mac because they just closed the window! In addition, linux is inside the Linksys router, and nobody not even me really cares because it's totally unobtrusive.

      My wife likes to play lbreakout2 and klickety. My daughter like kstars and gnome-mahjongg. Those came from linux, they were just re-compiled for the Mac under X-windows thaanks to projects like Fink. That's why they use linux, it runs under x86 and almost every other common processor such as ARM!

      How many PDA's run OSX? How much hardware is supported under OSX? Your definition of better may not meet everyones definition.

  2. Re:Inquiry about linux envy. by R0UTE · · Score: 3, Insightful

    *BSD struggles a with hardware support, this is the main reason that people are slow on the uptake of it for applications such as this, I would be all for *BSD, I use it on a regular basis and am pleased with it however I always install it on older machines so the hardware is supported.

  3. Tough choice... by skeptic1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmm...let's see, on one hand there's "Windows Lite" and on the other there's open, free Linux.

    Is it really that surprising that India chooses Linux?

  4. Good for OSS projects by bvankuik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine if the vast armies in Bangalore and Hyderabad get to know Linux and open source software in general, and all start scratching their personal itches. This could mean a giant boost for both existing and new open source projects.

  5. Re:If there's anything worse than being Third Worl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's being Fourth World and the poor Indian folks can't pay for Windows I'm afraid.

    first of all, the story is about military embedded usage.
    secondly, tell me how many people in the western world actually pay for windows?, a huge chunk of people use an illegal copy.
    thirdly, you don't know shit about india, so don't talk.

  6. Kind of interesting... by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That 80% of development jobs are being outsourced to India but don't seem to pay enough for developers to buy their own product.

    It'd be just desserts if this sinks the companies involved. They want employees to understand that a "world economy" creates natural downward forces on jobs in affluent nations but want every customer to pay like they live in the U.S.

    Irregardless, managing for long-term viability is a dead concept.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  7. Re:India should use OS X, not Linux by Orgazmus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Impossible learning curve of Linux?
    I made an 80 year old man run linux on his first ever computer. He was writing, managing and printing documents after a couple of hours. I think it might be you doing the sucking, not linux.

    --
    The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  8. Re:India should use OS X, not Linux by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not surprised... Linux isn't THAT bad to learn. If a person wants to dedicate even the smallest amount of time, they can learn to use just about anything with a UI (console is a bit more tricky). Apps are pretty cookie-cutter now, so as long as you know how to start them you should be ok.

    I will give the anonymous coward the point that OS X is easier to learn. The UI is more polished, and there's less worry about messing with some obscure .conf file or setting. I'm not saying it's common, but it happens.

    As for cheaper than PC's... sorry. If you want, you could argue the mac-mini thing, or that the quality of a PowerBook is much better than the quality of a Dell Inspiron of the same price. But in reality, Apples are more expensive.

    As for a country choosing a platform to begin a major CIS/IS venture, linux is the obvious choice. It's free, open, and can run on older hardware. Plus, knowing the inner-workings helps a person understand a lot about computers.

    I have no problem with India becoming a information powerhouse, or with them getting consulting business. My only problem is with the companies that replace full time employees with a consulting firm in India.

  9. Freshness by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you are around the age of 30 like me you will remember toying with 8-bit computers, not the most user friendly and easy to use computers. No gui, no mouse and often no disk drive.

    But we loved those 8-bit machines, they were fresh, something new and exciting. Just like a PC will be to someone who has never owned a computer before. If you are starting out in computing now then you aren't likely to have 10 or so years of Windows experience behind you. You will approach things with an open mind. Windows users typically believe Linux is a very hard OS, it isn't, it's a lot more open and straight forward. It's just different to Windows like German is a different language to English.

  10. Re:Inquiry about linux envy. by miffo.swe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because releasing something under a BSD license will result in a big corporation taking your hard work, smack a logo on it and after having made it incompatible with your version, charge YOU for it.

    BSD under a GPL license would make all the difference.

    Ill hammer it in again, its the friggin license that puts everybody off, BSD is nice otherwise.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  11. Re:India should use OS X, not Linux by gosand · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Apple computers are cheaper than PC's. The OS X operating system can allow less educated people to use computers without the huge learning curve of Windows.

    Less educated people like Americans? And to be fair, I am an American. But we seem to be getting more and more stupid. Look who just got re-elected. We allowed, and are still allowing, companies like Microsoft to do their dirty dealings. If you ask me, the rest of the world is leapfrogging us in technology because our opinion of ourselves is too high. We need to quit believing that we are the best and that all we need to do is pray to Jesus to fix all our problems.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  12. SATHI by angryelephant · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it amusing that they used English words to form a Hindi acronym?

    Says something about Indian culture.

  13. Re:Inquiry about linux envy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You're full of shit. The BSD license requires that proper credits be given. In fact that's the only requirement.
    How can you not understand this, and yet espouse the greatness of the much more complex GPL?