Slashdot Mirror


NVIDIA's nForce Professional and Tyan's Words

CoffeeJunked writes "There's a lot of buzz about dual-core CPUs and with the release of the nForce Professional chipset from nVidia, there's a lot of buzz about the future of SMP machines as we know them. LinuxHardware.org has just published a couple of articles that get to the heart of the new chipset and what board manufacturers will be doing with them. The first article covers the chipsets and boards, while the second article is an interview with Tyan about what to expect from them this year. It's a good read all around."

30 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. The boards look great, except... by RebelWebmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where are the SATA connectors?!?!?! I find it amazing that the K8WE only has 2 and the K8SER 4. While we're on the topic, having at least 1 PCIe x1 slot would be nice. These high end server boards are being outclassed by nForce4 SLI motherboards. (And for the record, using more than 4 SATA ports is very doable)

    1. Re:The boards look great, except... by lachlan76 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      High end servers sure aren't gonna be using SATA...

    2. Re:The boards look great, except... by jred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      CPU load. SCSI puts much less of a load on your CPU than (s)ata does.

      SATA rocks, though.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    3. Re:The boards look great, except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry but 10K rpm SCSI drives (not to mention 15K) pound even Raptors extrememly hard in the performance arena. Look it up. No, here you go:

      http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q1/maxtor-diamon dmax10/index.x?pg=4

    4. Re:The boards look great, except... by cg0def · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you really know anything about high end workstations and server design you would never ask why there are notmore than 4 sata connectors. When it comes to servers sata drives are used for storage of data that is not accessed often and scsi drives are used for data that needs to be easily available. Too bad serial scsi is not out yet but that will come too. Plus 4 sata connectors give you way over a terrabyte of storage and that would be enough for the kind of application that you are thinking about. After all this is not a storage array.

    5. Re:The boards look great, except... by dasunt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      CPU load. SCSI puts much less of a load on your CPU than (s)ata does.

      Depending on the task, the CPU for PATA/SATA isn't that bad.

      For fileservers, on a price/capacity ratio, SATA will kick SCSI's ass to the curb and back. While SCSI is faster, and, on average, more reliable, SATA is often 'good enough'.

      Or imagine a webserver with huge amounts of memory. For performance, SATA and SCSI will be roughly equal, since most files will be cached in the memory.

      What about a DNS server: Again, the performance of the system should be dependent on memory, not the hard drive speeds.

      Don't forget firewalls. SATA is fast enough for log files, and the CPU shouldn't be a bottleneck unless your firewall rules are extremely complex.

      I wouldn't use SATA in a database server or in any other application with a lot of random disk reads/writes, but it has its uses, even in servers.

    6. Re:The boards look great, except... by Homology · · Score: 2, Informative
      For fileservers, on a price/capacity ratio, SATA will kick SCSI's ass to the curb and back. While SCSI is faster, and, on average, more reliable, SATA is often 'good enough'.

      If you buy a SATA drive you can expect the same relability as a IDE drive. An exception is WD Raptor that has a MTBF of 1.2 million hours full duty cycle, like SCSI drives.

    7. Re:The boards look great, except... by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why the fuck, oh why, oh why, cannot these damn onboard RAID or Hardware RAID chipsets provide a standard IDE emulation interface so that volume one, consisting of a RAID 1 mirror of physical disk 1 and 2 appear as one logical disk 1 to the Operating system? WHY!?!?!?!?!

      I'm set to dump my Promise SuperTrak for an IDE enclosure with built in mirroring that presents the disk as a single IDE mirror. I'm sick of being unable to do kernel upgrades because my vendors driver is randomly incompatible with certain versions...

      I could understand needing a driver for management capabilities, but the Linux driver for the Supertrak doesn't implement those...

      http://arcoide.com/miva/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD& St ore_Code=ADPS&Product_Code=EzRAID&Category_Code=EZ _FAMILY

    8. Re:The boards look great, except... by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've got a SuperTrak (the 12 drive version) running on a Linux 2.4 server running Debian. Make sure you enable the non-Windows OS option on the card (changes it to I2O operation), and turn on I2O options in kernel config. Works like a charm.. appears as one device.

    9. Re:The boards look great, except... by Jason+Hood · · Score: 2, Informative

      CPU load. SCSI puts much less of a load on your CPU than (s)ata does.

      That completely depends on the controller used. SATA unlike PATA, can easily reach or exceed specs for SCSI in terms of speeds/latency/load.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
  2. Talk about useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, they are designing a chipset for servers, which will run linux or bsd, but they refuse to provide docs or hardware to linux and bsd developers, meaning their shit is always poorly supported. Hooray.

    1. Re:Talk about useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a bit concerned about the nforce4, from what i read already, there are 3 models, a "normal" nforce4, a "ultra" nforce4, and a "sli" nforce4. But altough you can't use SLI on the non-sli models, there are ways to enable SLI, on at least the ultra model ( http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2322/ ).
      To quote the article, "Just as quickly, we learned that nVidia was not happy with this "SLI hack" and they changed their drivers quickly so that "semi-SLI would not work with current and later Forceware drivers." It appears that the later Forceware drivers check the chipset ID and if the driver sees "Ultra", then SLI is not enabled. MSI decided to kill the "semi-SLI" board because it would be a nightmare supporting a board that would only run with older nVidia SLI drivers."

      So, how will this be (un)supported by the opensource community? Is nvidia doing to chipsets what they did to graphic cards? Everyone remembers how they locked out rgb overlays and unified front+back buffers from the geforce4 cards, altough the chips had the funcionality built-in, the drivers would disable these features, and save them for the more expensive quadro cards (there were some quick fixes for this, for windows, mainly rivatuner and softquadro4).
      Does this means that now they're going to lock-out funcionality available on the chipset to maximize profit? I can't imagine how (linux) kernel developers will support a chipset which relies on closed drivers to enable or disable a specific funcionality, and judging by nvidia's attitude in the graphic cards department (which has a point, up to a certain extent nevertheless), i can't imagine nvidia releasing the specs for opensource drivers for this chipset, therefore loosing the income from the sli model, which would become redundant.
      Do we now have to taint the kernel with chipset drivers? If so, i'm out of it, this is certainly a chipset to avoid.

  3. The New Tyan Boards using the Nvidia Chipset by rchatterjee · · Score: 5, Informative
  4. Free Drivers by gustgr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Finally, NVIDIA's SLI has been a hot topic here because, as of yet, we haven't seen Linux drivers that support this hot new feature. When we talked to NVIDIA about this we were finally given a time-line which stated that it may be a couple of months still.

    If the drivers were free software someone skilled enough would hack the missing features. Isn't about time to nVidia change its mind and release the sources?

    1. Re:Free Drivers by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the drivers were free software someone skilled enough would hack the missing features. Isn't about time to nVidia change its mind and release the sources?

      Tell that to David Kirk nvidia's chief scientist whose, "sense is that developers on those platforms are quite happy with our efforts" as a justification for not going open source. Plus some totally bizarro bullshit about "hackers tak[ing] bad advantage of raw hardware interfaces."

      It is telling that he did not pull out the old, tried and true "competition sensitive" bullshit that so many hardware vendors have been hiding behind since day one.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Free Drivers by Vanders · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That makes a little bit of sense for 3D graphics drivers, maybe. It doesn't make the slightest bit of sense for a Gigabit ethernet controller, a SATA controller or even an audio DSP. These sorts of components are being churned out by different manufacturers across the world, and most of them have freely available documentation.

      Even more bizare, nVidia contributed Gigabit patches to the forcedeth driver. Yet they not only continue to produce their own closed driver, they still refuse to release specs. It boggles the mind.

  5. The K8WE has 4 by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 3, Informative

    The picture doesn't label the other two. They're down by the SCSI controller pointing forward instead of up. They're also on the RAID with the ones in the picture.

    Trust me.

    (I have one of these boards at my desk.)

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  6. Nvidia Taking a Stand by FiberOpPraise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just a few years ago, Nvidia was practically unheard of in the motherboard market. They slowly crept in with the relase of nforce/nforce2/nforce3/nforce4 chipsets. Having an integrated video card and chipset is somewhat advantageous despite the driver troubles that linux users face. Nvidia is slowly gaining market share over motherboard chipsets, I see this as a good thing. My NForce systems are working great and so far everything has been smooth. If Nvidia keeps up with the great work and frequent updates of their chipset, I will be a satisfied customer. How do you feel about Nvidia presence in the motherboard market?

    1. Re:Nvidia Taking a Stand by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just a few years ago, Nvidia was practically unheard of in the motherboard market... How do you feel about Nvidia presence in the motherboard market?

      Before NVIDIA entered the chipset market with nForce, I didn't seriously consider buying AMD Athlon CPUs because I thought the previous "consumer" chipsets (VIA, SiS, ALi) sucked ass. Maybe I'm being a little harsh about the pre-nForce Athlon "cheapsets." However, I felt a lot more comfortable using the relatively reliable and robust Intel chipsets, even though I thought the Athlon was the better CPU.

      To me, the chipset is just as important as the CPU when choosing a computer platform. NVIDIA gives the AMD platform a lot more credibility.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    2. Re:Nvidia Taking a Stand by MojoStan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      However, you forget that Nvidia hasn't actually integrated a GPU in their core logic since the nforce2 chipset... Perhaps Nvidia found that IGP sales hurt their discrete solutions?

      Perhaps. But I think another possibility is that the nForce3 chipset was not meant for "budget/mainstream" users, but for "enthusiasts." As we all know, enthusiasts don't want integrated graphics that share memory with the system.

      The nForce4 chipset, on the other hand, does look like it's aimed at budget/mainstream users as well as enthusiasts. But with PCI Express and TurboCache, NVIDIA might have a cheap solution that's better than integrated graphics.

      PCI Express x16 has more bandwidth than AGP (4 GB/s upstream and downstream) and allows writes directly from the GPU to system RAM. This allows a non-integrated graphics card to share memory with the system without the huge performance hit that AGP would have caused.

      Instead of integrated graphics, maybe NVIDIA is planning to "bundle" their cheap TurboCache cards with nForce4 motherboards. That seems cool to me.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  7. Anandtech article was quite interesting... by Bob-o-Matic! · · Score: 4, Informative

    Normal view: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx? i=2327

    All in one page/"print" version: http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2327

    Lots of intersting possibilities. Seems to me that given a motivated/visionary motherboard maker, the only real limits are based on the form factor. Is there a super-ATX out there that would allow for say 8 PCI-e slots, 16+ hard drives, and all the rest of the goodies, all in one case?

    Some will ask if there really is a need for this. Anandtech's Derek Wilson points out that having all the onboard disk controllers could add up to substantial savings-- apparantly expansion card controllers are quite pricey.

    Now, if only those Opteron 8XX processors didn't cost $8XX... (or thereabouts... you get the idea!)

  8. Re:brains on the side by mvdw · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't have to. It all happens transparently: I have a dual-CPU athlon MP setup at home, and I can confirm that it happens just like that. Each process starts on the processor with the least loading.

  9. I'd at least respect honesty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We use our drivers to cheat on benchmarks, and if we released info for people to write a driver, it would show our hardware's not as good as we pretend."

  10. Re:brains on the side by XMichael · · Score: 2, Informative

    Quote: Can I config a dual-P4 machine to run X clients on one CPU, and my X server on the other CPU, with the nVidia machine displaying the server output? That's the kind of Linux multiprocessing I like.

    Of course you can, this isn't a NVidia, Intel or AMD thing, its a Linux thing. The operating system is responsible for deciding which processor to assign the work too.

  11. nvidia and Linux drivers by jgarzik · · Score: 4, Informative
    As a for-what-it's-worth from a Linux driver author...

    nvidia SATA status and other Linux SATA info.

    nvidia wrote the SATA driver that's current in the Linux kernel, and has generally been helpful in addressing problems that arise in it.

    Although the ethernet driver ("forcedeth") was indeed reverse-engineered, nvidia eventually lent their support behind the effort: they contributed gigabit ethernet support to the driver.

    The video stuff is still closed, of course.

    Jeff
  12. This says it all for upgrades on that board. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dual core support on Tyan's Opteron platforms, is a feature we are very much looking forward to providing to all of our current and future customers. Unfortunately while its not possible at this time to directly comment on whether support will be implemented on the S2885, S2895 or other models from Tyan, customers should be pleased to know we are working to ensure compatibility on platforms going forward.

    Dual cores are such a major upgrade, why buy any SMP motherboard when 2 months it cant support the next generation SMP cpus...

  13. As a Dell laptop user... by setagllib · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...who previously had an nVidia Go 5200FX (or whatever order those tokens are meant to come in), and now a Radeon 9000, I can only say I'd rather have out-of-tree drivers that work perfectly for a good card than half-baked drivers for an average card (where good/bad are measured in usability, not necessarily performance).

    The Radeon under Linux (and I assume anywhere with an XOrg server) is a huge pain. Doesn't manually switch output displays with Fn+F8 like it should, and xv [the direct output mode, not the graphics program] only goes to the lappy panel, never to an external monitor. It might be a really trivial change in the driver source, but in the mean time it's an uneccessary frustration.

    --
    Sam ty sig.
  14. Very fast machines by tinrobot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a pre-release Dual Opteron/NForce machine from an unnamed manufacturer sitting right here next to my desk. We haven't finished benchmarking, but so far, it's wicked fast.

  15. Re:brains on the side by ckaminski · · Score: 3, Informative

    Many operating systems have a concept of processor affinity, whereby due to caching issues wish to ensure that thread/process migration from CPUs does not occur. WindowsNT once had a problem whereby you could ensure that after every context switch your thread had migrated to a new processor, invalidating it's cached data and killing performance. Some applications require this sort of thing, and if you want to ensure that this migration behavior occurs as little as possible, then you can set affinity flags that clue the OS into this fact. It will then attempt to migrate your thread only as a last resort.

    So, Windows can do this, even though it's only a guideline, as opposed to a true enforcement. I understand Linux has this capability, however I'm not positive.

  16. Re:My Favorite MB Manufacturer by Nik13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know what you're talking about. Bundling nice and important features (increasing value) is a good thing. Cheap onboard sound? Most these motherboards have 8 channel digital sound. A comparable creative (no thanks!) sound card cost almost as much as the motherboard alone. Useless onboard NIC? I don't know which ones you've tried, but I have yet to see one give me problems, from crappy ECS K7S5A motherboards to nice GBit lan on Asus boards. They just work. Cheap software RAID? If you want hardware RAID, go buy a "real" controller. It'll cost you a LOT more than the whole board does. For a lot of people, it's VERY valueable. No more promise-brand cards to buy that cost more than the mobo to do that. What's next? "I don't want no crappy onboard USB2? No Firewire?" I'm looking at a Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI and the ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe right now. They may be a bit more expensive, but they have nice things on them like 16x SATA RAID, SATA2, 2x GB LAN, 802.11g, IEE1394B, 8 channel digital audio (depending on which one you like better). Might look like crap to you, but it sure looks like a lot of nice stuff to me. And no, I'm no "enthusiast", overclocker, nor gamer. It's just a nice board with everything one needs or just about. No need to buy a bunch of 100$ PCI cards to have a complete system.

    --
    ///<sig />