Slashdot Mirror


Australia Gets 8Mbit/s Broadband now, 20Mbit Soon

danwarne writes "Whirlpool is reporting the 'bad old days' of slow, expensive broadband in Australia might be over, with the large ISP iiNet unveiling broadband internet up to 8Mbit/s, from $29/mth. It has been installing its own DSLAMs into the exchanges of Australia's incumbent telco, Telstra, which limits internet access speeds to a maximum of 1.5MBit/s. iiNet boss Michael Malone says as soon as the ADSL2+ standard is approved for use in Australia (which should be in a month or two), he intends to switch the DSLAMs over to offering 20Mbit/s speeds. It looks like Telstra and Optus, the two incumbent telcos in Australia might have their duopoly on high speed broadband (10Mbit/s cable internet) challenged, with potentially great ramifications for price competition in Australia. The only downside noted by Whirlpool readers is that iiNet is forcing customers to take their long distance phone service as well to get access to the 8Mbit/s speeds, a move which is ironically reminiscent of the tactics used by Telstra and Optus."

17 of 407 comments (clear)

  1. Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Please note that Michael has been sacked. Hopefully, those responsible for the sacking will not be sacked.

    This has been a brief public service announcement. Thank you for your attention.

    1. Re:Michael is gone! by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, is this for real? Michael is gone from the list of Slashdot editors (here's a Google cache from this morning). And he doesn't seem to have posted anything today either.

      Michael's departure, if true, would be the best thing to happen to Slashdot in a long time... and I've got two karma points to burn for saying so.

      Anyone got the sordid details?

    2. Re:Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a nice summary of michael's editorial failings. Also, don't miss this description of his general douchebaggery. His comment tacked onto the end of this story was probably the last straw; search the comments for "michael".

    3. Re:Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Anyone got the sordid details?

      Not me. But I have noticed something.

      Quite recently, slashdot started up some kind of partnership with speakeasy.

      On August 28, 2003, michael used five slashdot story tags to b*tch about speakeasy.

      maybe there is some connection there...

    4. Re:Michael is gone! by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that comment was inflammatory and highly biased, and these comments just show up the partisan nature of the /. crowd nowadays - a crowd that is persuaded into thinking a certain way by the editors in the items they choose to accept, and the way they present them.

      If Fox news (say) comes out with something equally as biased (eg. some company didn't get good support with open source, well what do you expect from a bunch of commie hippies who make it in their spare time) then /. would attack them. If /. says the opposite, but equally poor reporting, then its acceptable.

      The /. editors may be editors and not journalists, but they force the direction this site goes in, and as we see, there are too many kiddies and 'me too' posters that give the usual knee-jerk posts in a way that is cozy, safe and un-thinking in the knowledge that they'll get karma points (read: accolation from their peers) and the sense of community from similarly mindless readers here.

      That's a bad place to be - like an isolated community who only respects each other, and their shared, insular values. If you want this site to be respected by others, especially people from the real world who might just use OSS for real business purposes, then you want to give a more thoughtful, even-handed feel to the posts here. Where accuracy of posts (and especially articles) are more important than simply knocking anything that isn't free or open, especially snide comments like Michael's (who is, after all, a 'leader' here and thus expected to show better qualities in his comments)

      Anyway, that rant was brought to you by the words fairness and open-mindedness, and not bloody-minded arrogant knee-jerk post about a post that someone else posted that I disagreed with. ;)

  2. capped to 5GB/month by ZeekWatson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Too bad the caps are suitable for a 56k line though. :(

  3. Even if I had 20M... by meridian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most times I connect to overseas, and the latency/window size is the biggest speed issue. Even sitting on a 100Mb/s pipe to MCI at work you rarely see speeds above 2Mb/s to any site overseas especially if using TCP not UDP due to the latency issues and the nature of TCP windowing. OK so it might be fast to connect to other people on IInet, but thats the only bonus. Currently I have 6Mb/s ADSL to home in Australia (only one on my ISP with it from what I understand) and while I reach breakneck speeds to mirror.aarnet.edu.au on the Optus network to whom my ISP's primary provider is, I rarely see anything above 512kb/s to overseas sites. Going to just get unlimited 512k to the ISP I work for. No point getting any higher in Australia if your connecting to international stuff most of the time. And no its not because my ISPs are shit its just how it is being on the other side of the world. Fast to Singapore tho!

    --
    meridian at tha.net
  4. Re:VoIP by benbalbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The phone system over here allows you to select which carrier you use on a per phone call basis by prefixing with any number with a 4 digit selctor code, eg 1411 for Telstra (I believe).

    If iiNet force us to sign up and preselect to their long distance (i.e. you get carried by them by default) can't we just override on a per call setting?

    If so, we can still use our preferred long distance carriers, while getting the benefit of 8M broadband...

  5. Re:only 256k up? by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's still strange though. While 1MBit upstream is nothing to sneeze at, I'm really curious as to the technical aspect of why we can't have 8MBit full duplex, or even half-duplex, but in each direction. Back in the day you could order 512MBit, and it came with 256Mbit upstream... which was reasonable, since they were offering the 512down/512up to buisness owners for roughly triple what the "home" upstream bandwidth cost, my guess being for website hosting reasons.

    Nowadays it's cheaper to buy hosting at XYZ company for $100/yr and do it that way rather than host your own web site, and very rarely do buisness customers (I assume) go through their telco for webhosting, so it would make sense to no longer artifically restrict the bandwidth to home users.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  6. Re:only 256k up? by Hadlock · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Do you have any "tech" to back that up? I certianly haven't found any. It's not like the MPAA or RIAA would have any legal grounds for suing them for the files going across their network. Initially warez was a problem, with the limited bandwidth of broadband "back in the day". With 8/20Mbit networks, you could trade everything you have and fill your entire hard drive in a couple of weeks and not really strain the network, as most files should finish not long after you click on them.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  7. Re:You bastards! by longbot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've noticed that in the US, the speeds are generally lower, but we're fortunate not to have monthly transfer caps. In other countries, they usually have faster speeds, but anywhere from 2-40GB per month (typically "hard" - as in "shut you down") caps.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
  8. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by psy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually its not so lucky.

    99.9% of australian broadband adsl servers provide download caps. Normally this is between 5gig to 15/20gig and is split into peak/off peak hours. Once that is passed there will be an extra charge or the service will be slowed down to 32-64kb/s depending on the provider.

    Also on the story in order to get that you need to bundle with their phone service too ($29.95 per month AU), and you need to be on their DSLAM. Otherwise you are limited to 1.5Mb.

    Alot of users are complaining about the bundling in this forum post, as if you dont bundle you will get a higher cost along with half the download quota.

  9. Re:I wonder.... by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, there are no hidden download limits in any Australian ADSL plans (that I know of).

    Instead there are upfront and well documented (sometimes part of the plan name itself) limits.
    Usually fairly small too by North American Cable based broadband standards.
    But we know they're there, they're not hidden, and you usually choose your plan based on the right combination of speed vs downloads for you.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  10. Banned from IINET by digitalchinky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was banned from iinet (WA) in 2000 - back when they were 'small time' - the reason: I asked them (politely) not to send me their monthly 'spam' advertising filled with added services and features they were offering. They responded that I was the 'only' one across the entire country that had a problem with this, and that I should just put up with it. Use the delete button.

    I asked them once more not to send junk mail else I would go to the ombudsman. They did, so I fired off email to the ombudsman, got a few telephone calls from Perth, then Canberra, then Sydney - their spam STOPPED.

    So did my account. I was suspended. After a telephone call I was told that I would never be able to connect with them again - I was a problem client apparantly. I was sent overseas so I never had the opportunity to make lots of money from it all.

    Their service is actually quite good though! Or at least it was for me. Connected with iinet in Geraldton Western Australia. Never had any trouble other than that.

  11. Capping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm in Australia, and currently on a 128k iSDN account, unless I fork out extra cash on Satelite, I can't get anything better.

    When Broadband comes available to me...if it does, I will not upgrade until the capping of downloading limit is gone. I have 128k unlimited, and I chew 30-35gb a month alone for only $40. What's the point of paying $100 a month for a download limit that is usually much less than what I do?

    You can get unlimited, but it's hard to find, and usually the company quickly changes there plans after too many people sign up.

  12. Re:only 256k up? by SlightOverdose · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Much to learn, you have.

    Let me tell you about telstra.

    When I had my internet connection moved from another ISP to iiNet, they had to plug me into the iinet DSlam. Normally this would be a simple thing to do- just move the cable to the next rack and plug me back in.

    Telstra, however, turns this into:
    1: request disconnection
    2. after a few days, tech goes out and unplugs me
    3. Telstra sends a bill
    4. Pay bill
    5. request connection
    6. after a few days, tech goes out and plugs me in
    7. Pay bill
    8. Line doesn't work. Turns out telstra fucked up
    9. request telstra to fix it
    10. wait a few days, tech goes out and fixes it
    11. Telstra sends a bill
    12. pay bill

    well, you get the point.

  13. Re:That might sound fine by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which is why I'm suprised no provider in the US has realised that they could provide better service and get free advertising by allowing unmetered transfer between its own customers.
    I use roadrunner in austin, If I wanted to send a file to someone else in austin, it goes at my normal upstream cap of 50kB/s. If I could get a good 500Kb/s or so, they arnt really hurting (The line to my house is easily capable of it, and if it never leaves roadrunners edge, they arn't paying for it..). And then the free advertising kicks in. If your local isp becomes essentially a giant lan thats able to route packets out, wouldnt you be more likely to get your friends to use the same service?

    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx