Slashdot Mirror


State of the Union

travis slack writes "President Bush used his State of the Union speech to press home key domestic and international agendas. At home he promised to reform Social Security for future generations. Looking overseas, Bush vowed to spread freedoms around the world while continuing the war on terror, and he pointed to Iraq as a symbol of change."

13 of 448 comments (clear)

  1. Wrong Category by jgaynor · · Score: -1, Flamebait



    Shouldn't this be filed under 'funny'?

  2. Typical assinine name-calling by wizbit · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sorry, but I became much less interested in what Bush had to say after he wrapped up his social security segment. Two lines, in particular: ...we must pursue change with diligence, courage, and honesty

    Translation: If you oppose SS reform, you are weak, a coward, and a liar. ...our children's future is more important than partisan politics!

    Translation: If you oppose SS reform, you're playing politics, nothing more.

    That was more than enough for me.

  3. Re:FMA by siriuskase · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If that's your strongest argument, you aren't going to convince anyone who doesn't already agree with you.

    I'm not saying you are wrong, just your argument isn't worth crap and I'm wondering how it got modded insightful. Someone must have confused it with inciteful.

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  4. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    And a fag

  5. Jeez by IBeatUpNerds · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    I watched for about 40 minutes. The entire duration he spoke like he was the president of Iraq. What a goddamned asshole.

  6. Vision by jgardn · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    This is what Bush has and the left wishes they had. Bush sees a brighter tomorrow and a way to get there. The left? All they do is complain about Bush.

    I see a country held in the grip of one of the worst tyrants one can imagine. The only difference between Hussein and Stalin is one of scale. That regime was decisively smashed in a matter of days.

    Then came "winning the peace". In the face of terrorists, daily car-bombings, brutal murderings, millions and millions of Iraqis woke up and openly defied the terrorists and voted for their own future. Do you know the significance of the blue index finger? That's the voters of Iraq challenging the terrorists, "I voted! Come, kill me! You said you would behead me! Where are you, you cowards!"

    A people went from being peons to free citizens in a matter of years. Another key point: The immediate security of the polls was handled by Iraqis, not Americans. Americans were in the back, ready to assist if things got out of hand. The only Americans around the polling places were the reporters. Guess what? The Iraqis handled it on their own. The soldiers didn't run this time!

    This formula works, it will always work. It will work in Iran, it will work in Syria, it will work in North Korea. This is the only plan that works. All of the great American leaders knew this! Go read up on what MacArthur, Patton, Eisenhower, and other generals thought of this plan. Go see what presidents Kennedy, Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and FDR thought! They are in agreement. If there is a fringe wacko element, it is on the left. The American people support Bush because he represents their core values and dreams, since 1776 to today.

    Go ahead and keep whining, you leftists. Go ahead and keep wishing for American failure, for our economy to collapse, for Wall Street to burn. It won't happen as long as we have competent, visionary leaders in the White House.

    And here's something to set you off: Condi in '08. Romney in '16.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
  7. Re:Conflict of Interest: by delus10n0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No one cares about your opinion, especially an opinion as wrong and wacko as yours. I mean, with gems like this..

    The killing under Saddam was less than the killing under George Bush.

    For reasons beyond the scope of this comment, the mental illness called anger has been increasing in women in the United States.

    Do I even need to respond?

    P.S. - Way to be off-topic. We were talking about the State of the Union address, not your personal rant/vendetta against Bush.

    P.P.S. - You'd make Michael Moore proud, and that's not a good thing.

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  8. Seriously flaming by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    In general, men in the United States lack the social skills necessary to deal with this anger

    Were you trying to self-fulfill your prophecy by providing material to legitimately anger them? Seriously, do you have any evidence whatsoever for this ludicrous speculation, or was your plan to just throw that out there as fact and hope we all look the other way? Here, let me try one:

    In general, men in Europe lack the social skills necessary to accept their irrelevance in the new world.

    I made that up on the spot, just as you did your quote about American men. If my statement isn't flamebait, then how on Earth could you justify yours not being the same?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  9. Mod This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Shut up, fucktard

  10. Re:Social Security by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You don't seriously think your employer doesn't take that into account when deciding wage issues, do you? That additional social security would either be used to pay you more, or pay someone else more. The money does not magically appear.

    Hmm, I'm an employer. I suddenly no longer have to pay my share of FICA tax. I have the choice of returning that money to my worker's paycheck, or keeping it myself. In addition, I'm the standard capitalistic heartless bastard who believes that Greed is Good and Profit is King. Which do you think I'm going to do? Where do you think that money will be going?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  11. Re:We need to fight back by cheezedawg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This post is a perfect example of why the left is losing power.

    George Bush is telling us why we are going to succeed.

    The Democrats, "progressives", and Bush-haters are telling us why we are going to fail. Not only that, they are telling us that everything bad that happens is our fault.

    Your anger is misplaced. Try focusing it on the real forces of evil in this world.

    --
    "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
  12. Hello I am a random Slashdotter by Liberals_Are_Gay · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    and I am here to argue on a message board because I have no life.

  13. Re:Social Security by CaptRespect · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Or what if we didn't rely on the government to take care of our retirement at all? What if we took the responsablity to save money all by our selves?

    Screw the people that don't have any sense to save money for retirement. That just means they don't get a retirement!

    If I don't don't make enough money to buy a loaf a bread now, why is the government taking my money to "save" for retirement later? Shouldn't I be able to buy food so I don't starve to death or freeze to death?

    And what is this nonsense about "the weath gap"? The weath gap provides motovation for me to get off my ass and make some money for myself or for my children.

    Survival of the fittest. That's what I say.