Gosling: Partnership with Microsoft Meaning Less and Less
Jeebus writes "At an event in Sydney this week James Gosling questioned the technical relationship between Sun Microsystems and Microsoft in light of the antitrust demands of the European Union. Gosling also talks about reverse engineering, DMCA and collaboration with Microsoft with on identity management. "
Gosling described the DMCA, which was passed in the United States a few years ago, as "really vile."
Read Epic the first RPG novel.
Since when did a business partnership with Microsoft ever "mean" anything anyway (except decreased revenues)?
IANAL, so enlightenment on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Sun dominate the Enterprise users and Microsoft dominate the low-end users with their software, one is trying to acquire knowledge from another. Very simple, even a penguin can see this.
http://www.michel.eti.br
From the article:
"... but we can't then turn around and be part of the open-source Samba project, and make Samba actually work."
I wasn't aware that Samba didn't work.
Seems to work fine for me.
The last paragraph of the news story ends like this: In the hour-and-a-half session, Gosling answered many questions on a range of topics, including Eclipse and other Java IDEs (integrated development environments), DVD technology, security in Microsoft's .Net platform, the future of embedded software and more.
Only problem is the author thinks that's all we care to know about that. Sorta like writing "yadayadayada".
No need to actually report what his answers were. (Guess only an extreme geek like myself cares to hear what he said about these obscure technical topics.)
--- -- - -
Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.