Slashdot Mirror


SF Writers Sting Supposedly Traditional Publisher

deeptrace writes "A group of SF writers all submitted purposely awful stories to a publisher that purported to publish only selected high quality works. They created the worst story they could come up with, and it was accepted for publication." Their press release is pretty funny -- and if you'd like a sample of their insane prose, it's available through the book's Lulu site. (Where, Yes, you could also buy the whole thing.)

2 of 474 comments (clear)

  1. Atlanta Nights by jonadab · · Score: 0, Redundant

    > Didn't the same thing happen a few years ago with the people on one usenet
    > group submitting intentionally bad manuscripts to some company and get
    > most of them published?

    You may be thinking of Atlanta Nights, which was submitted to PublishAmerica.
    I ran into that story accidentally last week, when I was checking to see what
    sort of publisher PublishAmerica is, as a result of having someone out of the
    blue send me email at work recommending a book for the collection. (I work at
    a public library.) The author is not from around here, so she's probably
    mailing every library she can find on the web, hoping to get the book noticed.
    It's unlikely to work for her even if the book is good, since most libraries
    only purchase books through a small number of suppliers with whom they have
    existing accounts, such as Baker & Taylor, Emory Pratt, and so forth. These
    suppliers are unlikely to stock anything from a Print-on-Demand source and
    even more unlikely to stock anything that can't be returned if it doesn't
    sell. Needless to say, I didn't write up the book, and even if I had, it
    would have been unlikely to end up in the library collection.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  2. Re:Nothing new... by jonadab · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The parent is more likely thinking of _Atlanta Nights_, which was submitted to
    PublishAmerica. PublishAmerica _claims_ to be a traditional publisher, to
    review submitted manuscripts for quality, and so forth, but in actuality they
    will "publish" anything, if by "publish" you mean "print". They don't do any
    of the *other* things a publisher would normally do, such as edit or promote.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.