Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Seeks Latitude/Longitude Patent

theodp writes "Q. What does Microsoft feel is unpatentable? A. Apparently nothing! On Thursday, the USPTO published Microsoft's patent application for the Compact text encoding of latitude/longitude coordinates, in which the software giant explains how a floating-point number can also be represented as a less-precise integer that's displayed in base-30 notation!" If ever I have seen a silly patent, this is it.

4 of 598 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The Point: URLs by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's 10 digits and 26 letters, minus 6 vowels "to avoid the possibility of the algorithm inadvertently generating real words that could be offensive". Funny.
    B00BZB4BY.

  2. Re:Is it entirely MS's fault? by RootsLINUX · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Pretty sure the US Patent Office has a say in what is and isn't patentable."

    Oh really? I beg to differ. I've come across a couple fun examples recently

    Method of Swinging on a Swing.
    Gee, I wouldn't have thought of that one! I think I heard somewhere that this patent was granted to a 5-year-old? 0_o

    Method of Exercising a Cat (with a laser pointer...)

    Here's a nice little read on the US Patent System that was in IEEE Spectrum a couple months ago. The US Patent System sucks ass

    So you see, the US Patenting Office appears to patent just about everything. Oh no, I hope they haven't patented my favorite peanut butter and jelly sandwhiches...!

    Patent 5,567,454
    Patent 5,855,939
    Patent RE37,275

    OH NOES!!!!

    --
    Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
  3. Re:As Well, M$ is Not Stupid by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny
    because you can represent it with 30 symbols - i.e., 10 digits + 26 letters.
    In what number base does 26 + 10 = 30?
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Re:Is it entirely MS's fault? by David+Rolfe · · Score: 5, Funny
    4. Nice link to IEEE - they're clearly legal experts. Oh wait, they know about technology, not law. Patents are legal animals that have technology as content. With my thinking cap on, I declare that IEEE does NOT possess patent law expertise.

    Since you can't read:
    ABOUT THE AUTHORS
    Adam B. Jaffe is the Fred C. Hecht Professor in Economics and Dean of Arts and Sciences at Brandeis University, in Waltham, Mass. Josh Lerner is the Jacob H. Schiff Professor of Investment Banking at Harvard Business School in Cambridge, Mass. They cowrote Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It, which was published in November by Princeton University Press.

    Holy shit "black pages" I didn't know you were a higher authority than both a published Dean and a published Professor at Harvard. I'm totally putting you on my "friends list" because you are the obvious expert when it comes to patent law and its intersection with Economics and Business.

    While we're giving full disclosure, what are your credentials? They don't appear to be listed on your user profile.
    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.