Copyright Infringement and Shoplifting Contrasted
awesomeO4001 wrote in to mention a post to Karl Wagenfuehr's blog where he compares and contrasts the penalties for copyright infringement vs. shoplifting. From the post: "...from what I can tell, the penalties laid out for downloading one season of a TV show with BitTorrent are much harsher than if you actually stole a DVD set of the same show from a government store...For stealing the DVD you could face no more than up to 1 year imprisonment and up to a $100,000 fine; for downloading the same material you could face statutory damages of up to $3,300,000, costs and attorney's fees"
... if you downloaded a movie which you own because you stole the dvd from a store :S
Can I shoplift from a store in my underwear? I think the extra 3.2 million is a convenience fee for being able to commit crime in my parent's basement...
---
Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
By that logic, let's compare littering to a bank robbery.
Littering = Very easy to avoid being found out. It's not like people really notice someone drop something on the ground.
Bank robbery = Security cameras, guards, silent alarms, FBI involvement.
So, by your logic, since it's much, much easier to get caught robbing a bank than littering, you should get a much much stiffer penalty when caught throwing a gum wrapper on the ground.
Shall we say a $500 billion fine, and 4000 years in jail? That should keep your d = pc formula balanced...