Slashdot Mirror


Judge in SCO Case Notes Lack of Evidence

In a follow-up to yesterday's story, Allen Zadr writes "Computer Business Online has an article up today entitled 'Judge astonished by SCO's lack of evidence against IBM'. From the article: "Viewed against the backdrop of SCO's plethora of public statements... it is astonishing that SCO has not offered any competent evidence..." This is exactly what Groklaw has been saying all along, and they have commentary on the news as well."

4 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Does it mean by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 5, Funny

    That my Linux license is worthless?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  2. Re:DUPE by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny
    "I don't care if it ref's a previous atricle, it's still enough of a dupe to not be on the front page."

    Apparently, you didn't get the memo.
    In an effort to quell the angry masses who insist on yelling "DUPE", Slashdot editors will prepend
    "In a follow-up to yesterday's story," to every story.

    Looks like it is having a minimal effect however.
    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  3. And in more SCO news... by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 5, Funny

    The company I work for used to do a lot of business with SCO, and we still get holiday cards and whatnot from them from time to time. This past Christmas, we get a nice generic corporate Happy Holidays!-type thing from them. Except get this -

    It came postage due.

    I kid you not. It's hanging on the wall.

  4. Re:timing? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, the court transcript has been revealed.

    SCO: IBM did it.

    Judge: IBM did what?

    SCO: They stole our code.

    Judge: Evidence Exhibit A?

    SCO: My dog ate it.

    Judge: IBM do you have anything to propose?

    IBM: Can I buy all of you lunch?

    Judge: Case closed.