Judge in SCO Case Notes Lack of Evidence
In a follow-up to yesterday's story, Allen Zadr writes "Computer Business Online has an article up today entitled 'Judge astonished by SCO's lack of evidence against IBM'. From the article: "Viewed against the backdrop of SCO's plethora of public statements... it is astonishing that SCO has not offered any competent evidence..." This is exactly what Groklaw has been saying all along, and they have commentary on the news as well."
That my Linux license is worthless?
Sincerely,
Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
"Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
Apparently, you didn't get the memo.
Looks like it is having a minimal effect however.
Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
The company I work for used to do a lot of business with SCO, and we still get holiday cards and whatnot from them from time to time. This past Christmas, we get a nice generic corporate Happy Holidays!-type thing from them. Except get this -
It came postage due.
I kid you not. It's hanging on the wall.
In other news, the court transcript has been revealed.
SCO: IBM did it.
Judge: IBM did what?
SCO: They stole our code.
Judge: Evidence Exhibit A?
SCO: My dog ate it.
Judge: IBM do you have anything to propose?
IBM: Can I buy all of you lunch?
Judge: Case closed.