Slashdot Mirror


How to Install Debian on Mac mini

wikinerd writes "After the hype about Mac mini, a Linux consultant wrote a detailed guide on how to install Debian on Mac mini. The whole procedure takes about an hour, but you will need to erase the hard disk and learn to live without the AirPort Extreme, since it's unsupported. The guide also explains how you can dual-boot with Mac OS X and Debian and gives you ideas on how to set up your partitions."

3 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yes, but... by idobi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, You can install Virtual PC

  2. Debian and OSX by puregen1us · · Score: 5, Informative

    The main bonus of Debian has always seemed to me to apt.

    I have OSX. I have apt. I just installed fink, and got apt with it. I installed Apple's X11 and I run GNOME in full-screen mode. I like the way it runs with Aqua. The desktop is the same in both. I use LyX a lot, but don't like the Aqua QT version so I use the X11 version with GNOME it works better, but when I click "View DVI" it switches back to Aqua and opens TeXShop because I like that program.

    I love that kind of interoperability. I get the best of both worlds. I can apt-get install stuff, and still get nice OSX software running alongside it.

    If I did want debian on my powerbook I would install Ubuntu. I has a great install process, has a clean desktop even my parents could use, and runs well. But I wouldn't give up my Airport Extreme card for it.

  3. Re:Why ? by kitzilla · · Score: 5, Informative
    Honestly, who wants to run Linux on a MAC when they are able to run MacOS-X on it. Doesn't make much sense to me.

    I'm tempted to mod the parent as both overrated a troll, but I'll respond instead. And this is coming from someone who is typing on a dual G5 with two other Macs in view.

    The general answer is that it could be the user simply *likes* Linux or Debian (for a host of reasons that really don't need explanation to most Slashdotters).

    It could also be that the user is philosophically committed to Open Source software, or doesn't have the means or inclination to commit to an OS that doesn't come bundles with something as basic as a decent FTP client.

    It could be the user has older Mac hardware that feels sluggish with OS X. Apple has done good work optimizing OS X since its first release, but it's still pretty heavy.

    It could be that the user is building a server and has no need for the desktop goodness of OS X.

    It could be that the user was given or acquired a Mac box cheaply, but is committed to Linux.

    It could be that the user has acquired a Mac without an operating system, and finds the investment in Panther unaffordable.

    In the case of the Mac Mini, it could be the user has need of Linux in a small form factor.

    It could be that the user has a Linux application need and wishes to take advantage of the PPC platform's modest power and cooling requirements.

    It could be that the user is committed to Linux, but appreciates Apple's design ethic.

    Really, one could go on and on, but here are a few answers to your question. I suspect, however, your comment was rhetorical.

    It's "Mac," not "MAC," by the way. And there's no dash in OS X.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.