Slashdot Mirror


Using a Cellphone in a Basement?

Nimsoft asks: "I recently moved into a basement flat and as a result I get no cellphone coverage in there. This is incredibly frustrating as my cell provider is so much cheaper than landline offerings I rely on my cell as my primary means of telecommunications. I can pick up a signal the second I step out of my front door and friends on other networks can sometimes pick up a weak signal within my flat. What would the geek solution (must be cheap!) to this issue be? Would attaching a larger antenna to my phone work, or can I hack together some sort of repeater and put an antenna outside somewhere?" While thousands of offers of repeaters and signal boosters are only as far away as the nearest Google search, what recommendations or experiences would you care to share on the subject?

62 comments

  1. VoIP by madstork2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a similar situation. Except my office is in the basement. Anyway, I use Vonage.

    I have my cellphone set to conditionally forward to the vonage line. By that if I don't answer, instead of going to voicemail, it goes to the Vonage line. I use the Vonage voice mail. IMHO it is better because you can check the VM online via a web browser and other nifty features that are better than the cellphone.

    -MS2k

    1. Re:VoIP by aichainz · · Score: 1

      My situation is exact same as madstorks, verbatim. I went the Vonage route recently. Hey, you cant beat $25/mo for keeping the peace between me and my girlfriend regarding dropped calls...There's about a billion advantages that Vonage provides, I highly recommend them. I would say there's almost no near-term hope for getting signal down there, short of some cracked-out antenna assembly. Just bite the bullet for $25/mo. Sell blood or something...

    2. Re:VoIP by E_elven · · Score: 1

      I've been using Lingo rather than Vonage. A bit cheaper and the service's been excellent. And I get free calls to Western Europe :)

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    3. Re:VoIP by Jondaley · · Score: 1

      I had horrible service with Lingo. Although, I did only use them for a month before I cancelled it. a blog entry about lingo

  2. Slow News Day :( by Cokelee · · Score: 1

    While thousands of offers of repeaters and signal boosters are only as far away as the nearest Google search, what recommendations or experiences would you care to share on the subject?

    Why are you complaining? You posted the story.

    Voice over IP isn't a bad solution, but it still makes for two phone bills, not one.

    1. Re:Slow News Day :( by madstork2000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, since I spend so much time in my office, and now use the Vonage line a lot more than the cell line, it is cheaper with two bills.

      I used to have a big minutes cell plan and used the cell almost exclusively. But no with the flat rate of Vonage, I was able to switch to a much cheaper rate plan. Because of my usage habits, it has been cheaper for me to have two bills than it was with one big minute cell plan.

      -MS2k

    2. Re:Slow News Day :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster is not complaining, the editor is providing the last tidbit to attempt to keep the flames down... note the italics.

  3. Bluetooth headset by Badfysh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get a Bluetooth headset. Maybe you can leave your phone upstairs or near a window for a signal. You don't have to wear it all the time, just put it on when the phone rings.

    --

    I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    1. Re:Bluetooth headset by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth doesn't work that far dude. And quite possibly, he doesn't have access to the upstairs. Plus, whatever is keeping the cell signal from propogating down would probably keep the bluetooth signal from propogating as well

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    2. Re:Bluetooth headset by Badfysh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well Bluetooth is good for 10 metres, or 32 feet which is twice the size of my front room. He wasn't very clear but it might be that he can get a signal if the phone is actually on the windowsill, this has worked for me. Bluetooth should work fine, his problem is he can't get a signal from *outside* to his phone, but a signal from phone to headset within the same area should be ok. Also, cell phone frequencies are much different to bluetooth so the same conditions don't apply. While I'm posting, I was thinking he doesn't actually need a headset, he could use a USB bluetooth dongle on his PC and use the mic and speakers.

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    3. Re:Bluetooth headset by sycotic · · Score: 1

      you obviously haven't used bluetooth in a real world environment, it's no quite as fantastic as the marketing departments would have you believe :|

      --
      -- If I were a fish, I'd be wet
    4. Re:Bluetooth headset by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is rubbish on a PC, there's no doubt about that.. believe me, I know. But I use my Jabra BT200 on my Nokia 6310 all the time, it works amazingly well. And it means I don't have to get my old phone out in public...

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    5. Re:Bluetooth headset by pla · · Score: 1

      you obviously haven't used bluetooth in a real world environment, it's no quite as fantastic as the marketing departments would have you believe

      I've used a number of bluetooth devices in a VERY electrically-noisy manufacturing environment. It goes through a wall or two, and with line-of-sight, I've gotten better than 60ft range.

      The key? Don't use cheap consumer-grade bluetooth devices, you get what you pay for here. For example, we have a few barcode scanners that cost almost $500 each, compared with $200ish for a wired version. But absolutely no problems with range or signal integrity.

  4. Dear Slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Slashdotters, I need to use my cell phone inside my lead lined closet. Any suggestions?

    1. Re:Dear Slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, do us all a favour and seal yourself inside it.

    2. Re:Dear Slashdotters... by pyite · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear Slashdot,

      I just bought a new house from Faraday Realty...

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    3. Re:Dear Slashdotters... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Sure thing. Topple the closet backwards and get in your lead lined coffin^H^H^H^H^H^Hcloset and wait for a week or two.

      Your reception should then be out of this world.

      --
    4. Re:Dear Slashdotters... by dimator · · Score: 1

      You need to line your closet with sheets of asbestos.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  5. Ask your friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That don't have problems which carrier/phone they use. Use that.

  6. Passive Repeaters by AdiBean · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in the day (when I was more involved with Ham Radio), we would use a passive repeater to fill in dead spots. A passive repeater is simply two antennas connected by a piece of coax. One antenna is placed where it will receive the desired signal well, the other is placed where you want to improve the signal (in this case, the basement).

    Seems simple, but there are a couple of things to consider. First, you will have to know which band your cell phone is using at your house. The two likely choices are around 890MHz and around 1800Mhz (I am doing this from memory, so look it up). Then, the simplest antenna to make is a vertical dipole. Each antenna is two pieces of coat hanger, each piece cut to a quarter wavelength of the frequency you are using.

    The next thing to consider is that all coax has loss. At 1.8 Ghz, you could easily be looking at -10db per 100 feet for average coax. So, make sure that you use the best coax you can find (it will be more expensive, but worth it) and keep it as short as possible.

    If you are not getting enough signal with this arrangement, you can get fancy and build a better antenna for the end that gets a good signal from the cell tower. Two more pieces of coat hanger will let you build a three element directional array. Mount the coat hanger pieces through 3/4 inch PVC. You will need something like the ARRL Antenna Handbook to get the correct lengths for the pieces, and the distance between them. Since this kind of antenna is directional, you will need to point it at the cell tower. Also, remember to keep the elements vertically oriented, not horizontal like a TV antenna.

    Good luck

    1. Re:Passive Repeaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is exactly how many commercial places offer better cell phone sevice while inside.

    2. Re:Passive Repeaters by voisine · · Score: 1

      Here's a cringly article about building a http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20020207. htmlpassive repeater for 802.11b. You could probably do something similar with a can shaped correctly for your cellphone frequency.

    3. Re:Passive Repeaters by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Informative

      A passive repeater seems to be the most sensible idea I've seen so far.

      This guy should be able to build one for less than $20, and it's about as close to an instant, duct tape and bailing wire solution as you're going to get.

      As far as easily availible, decent coax RG6 is what you want. It seems to be what the cable companies are switching over to, and it should be very easy to get at your local home despot.

      Also, for Vp = 3E8 m/s a quarter wavelength is:

      84 cm for 890 MHz

      42 cm for 1800 MHz


      Also note that your quarter wavelength section need to be supported by something non-metallic (like wood or plastic).

      If someone wanted to create a true duct tape and bailing wire solution, it might actually be possible using a ladder-line type connection between the antennas. The losses at 1.8 GHz might make this unworkable, but if you're able to solve your problem with just some cheap wire, duct tape and a ruler, you'll look pretty badassed. I'll leave the transmission line spacing as an exercist for the reader :)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    4. Re:Passive Repeaters by AdiBean · · Score: 1

      Naw, badass is when you put in your own waveguide ;-)

      Seriously, ladder line actually has lower loss than coax, which is why its used in the first place. Problem is that ladder line will have an impedance of around 300 ohms. This will work poorly with a dipole, which has an impedance of about 50 ohms. You need a balum (impedance transformer) to connect the dipole to the ladder line, and then some kind of antenna tuner at the cell phone. Even if it was worth the hassle, I've never seen a balun, or ladder line, made for that high a frequency.

      Even RG6, which is relatively cheap, and has OK loss characteristics if you get the good stuff made for satelite installations, is 75 ohm coax, and so would not be a perfect match.

    5. Re:Passive Repeaters by unitron · · Score: 1
      Dipoles are 300 Ohm (that cheap wire antenna you get with an FM receiver is a dipole made out of 300 Ohm twin-lead), monopoles around 50 to 75.

      RG-58, the stuff they used to use for Ethernet, is 50 Ohm.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    6. Re:Passive Repeaters by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dipoles are 300 Ohm (that cheap wire antenna you get with an FM receiver is a dipole made out of 300 Ohm twin-lead), monopoles around 50 to 75.

      There's nothing that says ALL "ladder lines" have to be 300 ohms or 450 ohm or any other specfic impedance. It's just a function of your wire diameter and the spacing.

      Check out this page for a calculator.

      Of course there are very good reasons that engineers choose the impedances they do. But it's still at least theoretically possible to make the whole passive repeater setup with two pieces of wire and some duct tape :)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    7. Re:Passive Repeaters by rcw-work · · Score: 1
      Dipoles are 300 Ohm (that cheap wire antenna you get with an FM receiver is a dipole made out of 300 Ohm twin-lead), monopoles around 50 to 75.

      Center-fed resonant dipoles in free space are 72 ohms, folded dipoles are 288 ohms, ground planes are closer to 50 ohms depending on the angle between the driven element and the ground plane elements (is that what you meant by "monopole"?)

      If your cheap FM wire antenna is not folded back on itself, you'd better connect it to the 75ohm terminals instead. Otherwise you're losing most of your received signal!

  7. externall antenna time by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 4, Informative

    it is most likely that your cell phone has an antenna connector on it somehwere (most do, they are usually covered by small grey plastic plugs). i would find out what kind of connector it takes, and get a cell antenna (the kind people use in cars should work fine) that will adapt to it. signal loss with coax is a significant concern, so you will want to keep that link as short as possible, another way around this is to use a high-gain antenna deisgn, that should help compensate for the signal loss from the cable.

    --
    Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
  8. Car kit by Mike1024 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't some car 'hands free' kits include an outside arial?

    If so, the obvious thing to do seems to be to get one, and put the arial somewhere where it gets a signal.

    Just my $0.02,

    Michael

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  9. combine the old school car kits by johnjones · · Score: 1

    hey

    the best thing would be to find 2 car kit aeriels and attach them one upstairs one down

    use the phone to monitor best position of outside aerial ( unless you have a signal box)

    Note the gold on the conectors fudge it and no signal

    regards

    John Jones

    1. Re:combine the old school car kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is seeming like the best option so far. No pissing about making my own antennas, just buy two and connect 'em up.

      I can get reasonable (2-3 out or 4 on the meter) sigal from literally 1m or so above my window so there's going to be minimal loss between the two.

      I don't mind if the phone only works in that room, as long as it works and I don't have to leave the house, I'm happy!

      At the moment my phone is taped to the ceiling when I'm at home and my bluetooth headset relays the calls, but it's still a bit flakey and sucks having to stand on a chair to dial =p

  10. Cheap? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Your provider is cheaper than landline? That makes me want to know who your provider is. Though it may also be why they don't have a tower that can reach your basement.

    If the providers that do reach your basement aren't too much more expensive, you might consider switching. If you choose your handset carefully, it might overcome the poor signal.

    1. Re:Cheap? by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For me, any of the pre-pay plans are cheaper than a land line. I don't use enough minutes to exceed $20 every three months. You know a log of local providers willing to sell you a phone line for $7.00 a month?

      That isn't everyone however. My daughter can easily eat through $50 a month on pre-paid, so for here it would be cheaper to get either a land line, vonage account, or if she needs mobility, a $39.99 a month plan, once she figures out how to manage her minutes so she isn't going over whatever limits that plan has.

      My son can also work within the pre-pay limits, though he does go through more minutes at a time than I do.

      How expensive your plan is depends upon how much you use the service, and what that usage will cost. It does vary from person to person.

      For pre-pay plans I happen to like Virgin Mobile http://www.virginmobileusa.com/ (for US users, other urls for Europe) or Boost Mobile http://www.boostmobile.com/. Boost Mobile is a sub-division of Nextel, so they do have the PTT feature Nextel provides, though that's an additional $45 a month (on average).

      Since with Pre-Pay plans you buy the phone up front, there can be a significant front end cost. Anywhere from $59 on up to over $200 for highly feature full phones. However as noted, month to month may cost you significantly less.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    2. Re:Cheap? by fm6 · · Score: 1
      For me, any of the pre-pay plans are cheaper than a land line. I don't use enough minutes to exceed $20 every three months. You know a log of local providers willing to sell you a phone line for $7.00 a month?
      Well, lifeline service is at about that level, but basically you have a very good point. I'll have to give your links a look.
  11. External antenna by dasunt · · Score: 1

    You could try buying an antenna for your cell, like cellphone users used to use on cars. Try finding a spot near the ceiling where the antenna gets reception, then run the cable to where you want to keep your phone.

    For keeping the cable tidy, find removable wallclips. In the US, 3M tends to make them, I'm not sure what brands are available in your country.

  12. WLAN by theomedes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To counter problems like these, operators are coming up with WLAN-GSM / WLAN-CDMA solutions. A cellphone can switch seamlessly to WLAN network when you enter your home and there is WLAN signal. The voice traffic is encoded and transmitted to the operator's network. I believe, T-Mobile and Sprint have plans for such products.

  13. Vague/sketchy details by Kehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are "Ask Slashdot" questions allways so generic and vague?

    Try posting some more information ..... just a thought?

    ie.

    Location - What County/City/State? ..... even a Country/CONTINENT would help!

    Cellphone Service Provider - Would be handy.

    Current Cellphone - Make/Model - as above.

    Somebody may have had exactly the same issue in the same region with the same phone/provider and could answer your question in one sentence.

    Please when posting "Ask Slashdot" questions be a little more concise! .....

    My thoughts .....

    A basement is an enclosed space (I will assume you have no windows/sky lights) however there must be a means of circulating air around the "basement" - im thinking ..... air vents.

    Have a look at the car antenna kits that are compatible with you current phone - remember these antennas are normally installed in the rear car window and after trailing the cable around the window/sills/footwells you could easily use 6-9 metres of cable.

    Next ..... trace any wires/pipes/air vents that come into your building - could you follow any cable/phone/water inputs to the outside world? If so how far would it be to get a cable to there?

    Then stick a car antenna on the wall .....

    If you own the place then get out a 2 foot long drill - bang a hole through the wall - problem solved ..... or are you renting? (you never said)

    Even if you have to follow the path of an existing cable/pipe that runs "upstairs" - measure the distance - then talk to somebody who knows about signal loss /vs/ cable length when using car antenna (hint usenet) - from what I know the are shielded coax ..... so they *may* be useable at 100 metres.

    Then spend about (rough guess £40) on a bluetooth headset ..... as you phone will be pinned to the antenna cable ..... depending on max cable length

    1. Re:Vague/sketchy details by Punboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm thinking he's in Europe, as he called his place a flat. Americans don't call it that, and I highly doubt he is from Asia.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    2. Re:Vague/sketchy details by sycotic · · Score: 1

      We call flats, flats in New Zealand and we're on the other side of the planet from Europe in a greater area sometimes known as Oceania :)

      --
      -- If I were a fish, I'd be wet
    3. Re:Vague/sketchy details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have always been at war with Oceania.

  14. I had the same problem... by porcupine8 · · Score: 3, Funny
    I had the same problem in my basement apartment, exacerbated by the fact that I live in a heavily forested area.

    Then a hurricane came through town and took care of some of the trees for me. I get fine reception now! I highly recommend it!

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  15. Wireless repeater by MistabewM · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.4cellular.com

    ^ These guys sell a repeater that would suit your needs.

    --
    "A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.'" - DNA
  16. Commercial Repeaters by sahrss · · Score: 1

    There are commercial repeaters that are fairly cheap you can use. It depends on what you consider "cheap"...

    I completely agree with the poster Kehl above, we need more info! We don't even know what kind of cell phone you have.

    Since the question is so vague, all I can provide is a vague answer: To get started, Google "Cell Phone Repeater" and Froogle it to see what kind of items and prices you're looking at.

    1. Re:Commercial Repeaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to warn anyone about these commercial repeaters.

      There is a line you draw, and that is the border. If you cross a border, be it US to Canada or to Mexico, your repeater must meet standards and licenses in that country.

      For example, Nextel Licensed Repeaters have been purchased in Canada here, but they are not licensed to be used and there is quite a hefty fine, IIRC over $90,000.

      Plus the fact, that if you have a repeater from Nextel, and it's strong enough, you can actually knock out services provided by manufacturers repeaters in the area... not a nice thing to do...

  17. Here's a solution: external aerial by fbform · · Score: 1

    Get an external aerial. Check this blog out for instance: www.kiruba.com It describes a common solution in rural India where cell phone signals are fairly weak in some places.
    (you'll have to scroll down that page quite a bit - just search the page for "mobile phones").

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  18. Ask, and the shack shall provide by ChrisTower · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Ask, and the shack shall provide by graphicartist82 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Radio Shack: You've got questions, we've got blank stares.

  19. tie down a handset by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Informative

    Several companies make products like this one which let you stick a cell phone in a cradle and hook it up to one or more wired telephone sets. Just set one of these up at your entry and wire it down to the basement.

  20. Like I tell everyone. by /dev/trash · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Relying on a cellphone as your 'main' communication device is stupid. A cellphone is nothing but a glorified walkie-talkie.

    1. Re:Like I tell everyone. by mrgrey · · Score: 1

      Relying on a cellphone as your 'main' communication device is stupid. A cellphone is nothing but a glorified walkie-talkie.

      My cellphone is a walky-talkie and I pay for the feature. It's called Nextel Direct Connect.

      --
      -Tolerate my intolerance
    2. Re:Like I tell everyone. by Dachannien · · Score: 2

      Relying on a cellphone as your 'main' communication device is stupid. A cellphone is nothing but a glorified walkie-talkie.

      Okay, so why exactly does that make it stupid?

    3. Re:Like I tell everyone. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      exactly.

    4. Re:Like I tell everyone. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the last time my landline was so full of static that I couldn't hear the other party. The cellphone though, I can't remember when a call was clear the whole conversation.

    5. Re:Like I tell everyone. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      You can normally find many, many, areas where the line has little or no interference. For most of us, that's most of the areas we're in most of the day.

      This is the direct opposite of a landline, which will give you a clear, interference-free, connection in one location only.

      As an example, my BellSouth landline, with a cordless phone, gives me a clear signal throughout my home (as long as the microwave isn't on), but it's pretty much impossible to get a signal at the office, and I can't really get a signal when I'm in my car except when I'm a few feet from my home. By comparison, my Cingular (formerly AT&T Wireless) line gives me occasional interference in some areas of my house, but works flawlessly in most of it, as well as most of the street outside (and the streets from it to and from US1), most of US1 from my neighbourhood to my office, and throughout almost all of my office.

      If you're reading this going "Huh?", that's kind of the point. It's one of those things people do not think about when they make these kinds of comparisons. There's a good reason why supposedly unreliable cellphones are displacing landlines so dramatically - for normal use, they have massively superior availability to a regular landline. For normal use. Why? Because for normal use, you're out of range of your landline for a massive proportion of the day.

      The usual reason for thinking the opposite is that people rationalise the limitations of both technologies, and do not compare like applications with like applications.

      Bet you never thought of it like that :)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  21. embedded cellular module is a posibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i remember in that port-o-rotary project they used an embedded cellular module.

    a little on the pricey side but it would allow you to seperate the cellphone guts and antenna from the place you are using the phone.

    another option if you can get a signal anywhere in the room would be to put a shelf there and use a bluetooth headset.

  22. Ask a stupid question, get several stupid answers. by Myself · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, as everyone else has suggested, run a bunch of antenna feedline down to the phone, from an antenna parked in a good location. This sucks, because there's a tradeoff between flexibility and performance. Also, the antenna connector on your handset may or may not be very durable. However, if you're going to go this route, check a truck stop for adapters. Truckers generally spend a lot of time outside traditional cellphone coverage, and any well-equipped service plaza that's more than a hundred miles from a big city will probably carry an assortment of antenna adapters. They generally use TNC as the "common" antenna connector, since it was the standard on the old analog bag phones.

    Second, you could leave the phone upstairs where it gets decent signal already, and bring the voice downstairs. Do this with a Cellsocket or a Dock'n'talk cellular POTS adapter. Run a regular phone line down to where you spend most of your time, or hook up a cordless phone to the analog port.

    Next option: Leave the phone upstairs. Get a really long headset cord, if your phone supports voice dialing and an answer/hangup button on the headset. :)

    Yet another dumb idea: Leave the phone upstairs, and use a Bluetooth headset to bring the audio down. You should be able to dial by sending commands from a Bluetooth-equipped PDA.

  23. Uhhhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your friends get signal, maybe switch to their provider?

    Who would be so stupi... hey! is timothy submitting questions again?

  24. Re:Ask a stupid question, get several stupid answe by sycotic · · Score: 1

    I don't think you understood everyones Antenna suggestion, you don't actually connect the wire to the phone, just another aerial in the basement which the phone should use as it would a cellphone station.

    Have you used bluetooth through walls before? In my real world experience it does not work at all, infact bluetooth hardly even works in the same room when there are many obstacles.

    --
    -- If I were a fish, I'd be wet
  25. External Antenna by gophergod · · Score: 1

    You could always just use an external antenna. RadioShack sells a couple models that would work.

  26. Cheap and easy by n-shift2 · · Score: 1

    If you aren't too concerned with portability inside of your apartment, then you can go to any local wireless store, find an external antenna (these ones are usually used for car travel, that you can attach to the outside of the vehicle with a magnet) and mount it outside your window. Like I said, if you aren't concerned about portability while inside, then you can just leave it plugged in to the antenna until you are ready to leave.