Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

MIT Certifies Biological Engineering Major

Posted by timothy on from the we-can-build-you dept.

chrisd writes "In same week that Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney reitereates his opposition to stem cell research, MIT has certified its first new major in 29 years, Biological Engineering. The boston globe has a solid writeup about the biotech major."

7 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Rat-rights people just as bad. by Eunuch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is fascinating, but the writeup is pure flamebait. I know most geeks are atheists who don't grock all this "religion", but we'd do better to ignore the religious types who won't have any part in the future anyway. This stuff will just move to Singapore or the like as the backwards people oppose it. I'm studying neuroscience, and I have more problems with rat-rights or monkey-rights people (who may be in a different political party).

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
  2. What Romney Said. by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Romney said last week he favors allowing research on existing embryonic stem cells taken from embryos that would otherwise be discarded by fertility clinics , but he would seek to outlaw the creation of embryos specifically for research.

    ''Lofty goals do not justify the creation of life for experimentation and destruction," Romney wrote in a letter to Senate President Robert E. Travaglini.

    1. Re:What Romney Said. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's just moreau the same...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  3. In other news by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    All MIT geeks rushed to change their major in the hopes that they could engineer the perfect female obje^H^H^H^H companion that would get them laid.

  4. DNA Hack by TheSync · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those who want to start early to get ready for this, check out DNAhack, the website for amateur genetic engineering.

  5. Re:Nice writeup. by operagost · · Score: 5, Informative
    In case anyone is confused because they didn't RTFA, here's the opening paragraphs (emphasis mine):

    WASHINGTON -- Senator Edward M. Kennedy yesterday blasted Governor Mitt Romney's proposal to ban the cloning of embryos for stem cell research, saying the governor's approach would rob Massachusetts of the benefits of one of the most promising areas of scientific research.

    Romney, meanwhile, indicated he is open to new research as a compromise on the thorny ethical issue. On Friday, he is scheduled to be briefed on a method of generating embryonic stem cells without creating embryos.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  6. Re:Embryos and Life and Fertility Clinics by Avallach · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most people that I know of who are familiar with the process of IVF and stem cell research and consider a zygote to be a human being (A fairly narrow group, but one you seem to be asking about.) do regard IVF as unethical as stem cell research. The short version is that any time you're creating a human being with the knowledge that it will be destroyed, you're on shaky ethical ground. Whether that's the embryos lost in implantation, freezing, thawing, stem cell research, contraimplantational devices, or what have you, it's ethically the same.

    This is the heart of the stem cell debate for most people that I know. If an ethical method of harvesting stem cells that doesn't involve creating embryos to kill them can be found, then I'm all for it! There have been several promising stories on /. in that direction, and I sincerely hope that scientists manage to accomplish that goal. Stem cell research is a technology with incredible potential, but it must be pursued in line with ethical guidelines.