Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

FL Court Rules Against Spouse-Installed Spyware

Posted by timothy on from the well-that's-nice-of-them dept.

idobi writes "A Florida court ruled that it was illegal for a wife to install spyware on her husband's computer, in order to catch him in an extramarital affair. The three judge panel barred the woman from using the chat records from being introduced as evidence in the divorce proceedings. The court ruled that the software, Spector, violated Florida's wiretapping law - which states that it is criminal to 'intentionally intercept' any 'electronic communication.'"

9 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. Are logs illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So are logs now illegal in Florida? After all, logs are (usually) records of some form of communication which happens electronically.

    1. Re:Are logs illegal? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      it simply means she had a shitty lawyer.

      my divorce in 1996 I owned an ISP. my Ex was having an online affair and the court was happy to look at all her email logs, captured chat sessions and detailed logs of websites and captures of the images and the like.

      her lawyer tried the same tricks, the judge threw out the request stating "privately owned computer equipment is not under the jurisdiction of the wiretapping laws."

      granted I hired the best lawers in the state but it's still fishy that a judge would accept such a defense tactic.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  2. Now what about... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about text-sensitive software like Claria and WhenU that track certain websites using URLs through the IE address bar and pop up competitor's ads? Couldn't that be termed wiretapping as well, since it's actively monitoring addresses visited and keystrokes typed into a field?

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
  3. This sounds the same as a spousal wiretap to me by davidwr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure there are numerous cases in the last 20 years where spouses recorded their home telephone calls in the hopes of catching a cheating spouse.

    If this judge's ruling is in line with prior court ruling since the most recent changes in the law, then I don't see the problem.

    On the other hand, if he broke with precedent, he could be overturned.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  4. What about an email filter? by bwindle2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At my job (in Florida) we maintain an email filter, which isolates in-bound and out-bound emails if they contain certain qualities (either spam-like, or have big attachements, etc).

    I wonder if that would mean we are violating that law, since we are clearly intercepting electronic communications?

  5. FBI keylogging factoid by mveloso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just finished reading a computer forensics book, and found out something interesting.

    Apparently the FBI can't keylog you while a modem is in operation because of some bizarre issue with phone tapping (something like you can't tap modem communication without a separate warrant). The FBI keylogger actually turns off when a modem is active. How about that?

    I guess this sort of the same, but on a local level (and with a broader reach).

  6. a little twist. by theNetImp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IANL but... The judges ruled that she didn't have the right to install the software on his computer, but I am pretty sure that once you are married what's his is hers and what's hers is his. Doesn't that also make his computer her computer and wouldn't that also give her the right to install said software on her computer?

    1. Re:a little twist. by anagama · · Score: 4, Interesting

      • "No no no... You've obviously never been married. What's his is her's, and what's her's is her's."

      Truer words were never spoken. I actually used Spector about 5 years ago. Caught my wife in the middle of an online romance (the $600 phone bills were the real give away) and planning on cheating. Anyway, we got divorced shortly thereafter.

      I don't really think Spector and similar programs are "bad" (illegal perhaps), but at the same time, I don't think they are that helpful. Think of it this way: if you use the program and find evidence, most likely the relationship is over. If you do not use the program but the trust issues are so severe you feel like you need to, the relationship is also over. Why not save the trouble and spend the $50 on a new shirt - you'll be dating again soon whether you install it or not. The only purpose Spector serves is fueling a sense of self-righteous indignation -- a new shirt looks a lot nicer on.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  7. Homeland Insecurity by Baldrson · · Score: 5, Interesting
    it is criminal to 'intentionally intercept' any 'electronic communication.'

    So we can conclude that so-called "Homeland Security" -- which routinely intercepts electronic communication without a warrant -- is a criminal organization.

    --
    Seastead this.