New Funding For Free Software In The UK
AFFS writes "A new free software grants fund is available to projects in the UK
from money raised by the UK Free Software Network UKFSN.org, the free
software ISP set up by Jason Clifford in 2003,
and donations to UK's Association for Free Software AFFS.
The grants are open to any free software project or related campaign, by
both individuals and groups."
It's money for the act of developing the software, not for copying it. Shareware restricts you from sharing the software with your friend, that's not what the AFFS is interested in.
"Elmo knows where you live!" - The Simpsons
What's free beer got to do inwith anything? All the occurences of "free" in the story were meant in the origal sense (free speech).
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
[This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
Its not freeware (by which I assume you mean FRS or freely-redistributable software), its free software (freely copiable, modifiable and redistributable with the source code).
Remind me again why /. is so full of dumbasses.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
[This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
They're also a really good ISP and not any more expensive than other UK ISPs.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
[This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
i'm talking about those donations-thing. everywhere i look at open source projects they are free of charge. i just don't think it should be the way that open source follows in the long-term.
What are free of charge? You still aren't making coherent sentences.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
[This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
sorry, my first language isn't english. i just meant that i don't think its not very intelligent to go on with the donation-path. open source should be able to refinance.
Many times I've seen worthwhile projects suffer because the primary, and often only, author of the software has to cease development in order to earn a decent living.
There are also several areas where Free Software offerings are either pathetic or simply don't exist. This is usually because there is little interest among developers in writing such software. One of the aims I had in setting out to raise such funding is to provide an incentive for good developers to write such software to be released under a Free Software license.
Don't forget that Free Software does have a cost. That cost may not be charged onto the users but the developers always have to pay it in terms of their time and resources. Increasingly they also have to worry about legal expenses as well.
I assure you that UKFSN is not a scam. The accounts are published in an effort to ensure that this is clear.
Shareware is free software within a time period. After the expiration it's nothing unless you pay up.
All the occurences of "free" in the story were meant in the original sense (free speech).
Original sense? Too bad I don't have a copy of Johnson's dictionary, because I strongly suspect that even there the English word "free" has several different meanings, of which "unencumbered by price" and "unencumbered by excessive legal restrictions" are but two.
Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
Once all of this patent madness is sorted I wonder if municipalities will consider hiring teams of open source software developers to help build the local "e-frastructure" (horrible word I know) similar to how they now provide things like water, police, and possibly wireless Internet.
What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
http://houndwire.com
If you want to know why I left uklinux and formed ukfsn see my personal webpage at www.jasonclifford.com
Suffice to say that I left uklinux in April 2000 and have nothing to do with them.
At the time I left uklinux I was not aware of a single penny of actual donation. Everything was about spending money to promote uklinux (and the associated for profit businesses). The benefits to free and open source projects were a side effect. I didn't much like that.
The lack of accountability and the obvious lack of distribution of profits is what led me to form UKFSN and to publish the accounts.
Don't take my word for it though. Look into things for yourself.
Jason Clifford
Shareware is free software
Almost all shareware is proprietary. Exceptions include BitTorrent mainline, Azureus, eMule, and any other prominent free software project supported through donations.
English developed from german and french AFAIK. I don't know about french but as a native german speaker I know the german word "frei" which is almost exclusively used to describe freedom. The only exception is - ironically - "Freibier" (free beer) but I suspect that to be just because it is easier to pronounce then "kostenloses Bier" or "Gratis-Bier" which would be the alternatives.
Linux is not Windows
Etymology from OED (© OUP obviously):
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
[This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
"Free software"=software that has freedom (not that is free of charge).
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
[This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]