Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Corporate Email Clients Reviewed

Posted by timothy on from the to-head-off-your-whining dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Some companies seem to take the easy way out by depending solely on Microsoft for their email needs. To all IT managers who want to breathe easier, however, there are about eight alternatives in the market today, including Barca, Calypso, Eudora, Lotus Notes, Pegasus, Pine, The Bat and Mozilla Thunderbird--all featured in this review."

5 of 53 comments (clear)

  1. Article summary by Tyrdium · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thunderbird recieves the editor's choice, with praise for its platform range, expandability (the calendar and macro editor are mentioned), and price. In his final words, the author notes that there's "no single 'best product'", and that different users need different programs.

  2. Severely lacking in details by Wonko42 · · Score: 4, Informative
    The review doesn't provide any information that couldn't be discovered with a few simple Google searches. It's basically just a comparison of the advertised features of various mail clients with some subjective scoring based on these features. The reviewer doesn't seem to have verified that the features actually work.

    Both The Bat and PocoMail (the email component of Barca) have buggy and incomplete IMAP support, and the IMAP implementation in MS Outlook is prone to some really weird quirks that can render it unusable with certain IMAP servers. I haven't personally used Eudora or Pegasus, so I can't vouch for either of them, but Thunderbird and Pine both have excellent IMAP support.

    However, despite being an excellent IMAP client, Thunderbird still lacks support for mail redirect, a basic feature of most mail clients and one that is frequently used in corporate environments.

  3. I Agree by Uber+Banker · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you don't include Outlook (well, this is corporate, so the comparison is Exchange, an entirely different beast from Outlook) in the comparison?! Sure look at the competition but compare feature with feature, I found this article odd that they didn't objectively review the target: Outlook/Exchange

    My Take on Exchange
    As much as I dislike Outlook as an email client, it is an OK email/shared calender/shared resource platform.
    My company used to use Novell Groupwise which was OK from a user perspective but not great. Now we use Exchange and it is mainly better from a user perspective (the odd thing is inferior, like new email alerts).
    I have email, I have a calender on a personal, group, ad-hoc group and organisational basis, I have easy integration with my mobile phone/PDA, I have easy integration with out document mnagement system. It is all easy from a user perspective.
    Exchange admins do their job well, security and network personnel find it an improvement as easy to look after.
    Sure there is a charge, but seamless operation for users and a straightforward system for admins is worth paying for.
    Lock-in? They're all plain text/HTML emails and saved/transferrable as such, the calender is exportable as plain text - pretty OK compared to the properitery nature of Excel or VBA macros, something to make more of a fuss about.

    The 'editors choice': It would be absolutely great if Thunderbird had a decent calender and PIM, Mozilla is great. But at the moment it doesn't even have a daemon to alert of appointments. What a joke.
    I use Firebird as my home-based web client. I do not use it, or feel the need for it, in an organisation which parses every packet for malicious code, has many full time security and network professionals and stays on the cutting edge of security. Sure not day0, but that's the definition.
    Think about the user: I am a user with an IT skill/interest but not operational function, I'm happy about that.

    Perhaps my company is one of the better of the pack, we even have quantum crypto links with affiliates. But we are 'enterprise' and Exhange/Outlook offers an excellent deal and little lock in, which is good enough.

  4. Lotus notes? by walt-sjc · · Score: 3, Informative

    The terms "Lotus Notes" and "breath easier" are generally not seen together unless the topic is moving away from it.

    It also has some of the WORST HTML compliance / rendering of any application I have ever seen. Just do a google search for "lotus notes html email".

    Please anything but. (well, maybe not Outlook...)

  5. Re:useless article anyway... by ManxStef · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, it can be little confusing at first, but if *does* make sense (in that SMTP servers are indeed independent from POP/IMAP). I'd agree that Thunderbird doesn't compete with Outlook, but then, it's not really designed to (at least, not until they integrate the Sunbird calendaring). It does, however, make an excellent drop-in replacement for Outlook Express which is much less prone to spyware & spam, so -- alongside Firefox -- suits the average parent/in-law very well :)

    To set up SMTP servers :-

    Tools - Account Settings... then scroll to the bottom of the left-hand pane to Outgoing Server (SMTP). Most people just have one here (their ISP's). To add more, click the Advanced button in the right-hand panel (you can set one as a default, too).

    To make a particular POP/IMAP account use a particular server :-

    Tools - Account Settings... then expand the account you wish to change in left-hand pane choose Server Settings. In the right-hand panel, click the Advanced button - you should get a tabbed dialog. Choose the SMTP pane, and pick the SMTP server you want to use from the drop-down.

    Hope that helps!