U.S. Agencies Earn D+ on Computer Security
MirrororriM writes "Seven of the 24 largest agencies received failing grades, including the departments of Energy and Homeland Security. The Homeland Security Department encompasses dozens of agencies and offices previously elsewhere in government but also includes the National Cyber Security Division, responsible for improving the security of the country's computer networks.
'Several agencies continue to receive failing grades, and that's unacceptable,' said Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., the committee's chairman. 'We're also seeing some exceptional turnarounds.'"
D isn't failing.
"You're below average, but you do it very well!"
Better work on that C++
"A D+ is NOT a failing grade. Sure, there's some room for improvement, and we're working on this. It's hard work. But the fact that these agency passed the test, even by a slim margin, is good news."
Now watch this drive.
Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
If I was more involved in politics, and, for some unknown reason, absolutely hated Bush...my commment would read something like:
Ah...stupidity is a communicable disease...
Isn't the point of security to be mute? (about the secrets, that is...)
Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
We all know grade inflation runs rampant in the U.S.
.. that they showed up for class and tried their best. It's all we can really ask for.
Grades of D and below can no longer be referred to as "failing" and are now to be referred to as "success challenged."
Yes...I would hate to think the Government would have to spend billions on something as unimportant as securing their computer systems. Couldn't they just do it as a supplemental request?
'We're also seeing some exceptional turnarounds.'
now, ianam (i am not a mathematician) but is there any other direction for them to go....?
The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
-Oscar Wilde
Next time we attack a country and then the public finds out there was no evidence behind the attacks, they won't have to get Britain to cover for them.
They can just get a guy with a nerdy voice to go up to the podium and say "OMG WTF OUR DATA WAS HAX0RED."
At least that excuse is believable.
You didn't RTFA before complaining that people didn't RTFA.
They've gone from D to D+ -- sure, there's still room for more improvement, but why do you guys always have to look at the negative side of things?
You know they graded on a curve.
Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!