More on Newly Broken SHA-1
AnonymousStudent writes "Details are out about the reported broken SHA-1 hash function. The findings are that SHA-1 is not collision free and can be broken in 2^69 attempts instead of 2^80. This is about 2000 times faster. With todays computing power and Moores Law, a SHA-1 hash does not last too long. Using a modified DES Cracker, for the small sum of up to $38M, SHA-1 can be broken in 56 hours, with current computing power. In 18 months, the cost should go down by half. Jon Callas, PGP's CTO, put it best: 'It's time to walk, but not run, to the fire exits. You don't see smoke, but the fire alarms have gone off.' As Schneier suggests, 'It's time for us all to migrate away from SHA-1.' Alternatives include SHA-256 and SHA-512."
No, it's 2^11 times faster, which is 2048 times faster... Rule:
a^n / a^m = a^(n-m)
The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
2^80 / 2^69 = 2^11 = 2048
2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2 = 2048 times faster
Someone you trust is one of us.
Why the hell to people quote Moore's law this way? Moore's law says FUCK ALL about chip speed. It talks about chip transistor density. We have already noticed that chip speed in the last while has slowed down. So where the hell do you get that in 18 months, Moore's law says it will cost 1/2 as much to perform the same calculations?