Slashdot Mirror


Google Building Tech Center Near Portland

jdray writes "It seems that everyone's favorite search powerhouse, Google, is building a tech center in The Dalles, Oregon. About 45 minutes by interstate highway from Portland, The Dalles is a small, economically depressed city near the world-famous Columbia River Gorge. The $60,000 average annual salary of Google employees is about double the average for Wasco county. With all the outdoor sports (windsurfing, hiking, mountain biking, skiing) in the area, sports-minded geeks should be flocking to apply for a job at the new facility."

18 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by HarryCaul · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Formerly known as slashdot.

    Seriously guys, it's getting to be a bit much.

    Google is a company with a nice product. That's about it.

    1. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by tricops · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed. Some geeks nurse a desire, others desire a nurse.... everyone has their own wants and desires!

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
  2. Hmm? by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    sports-minded geeks

    Who what now?

    1. Re:Hmm? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yes, geeks participate in sports. Don't be so stereotypical.

      Google is planning going to provide equipment for all the popular sports on the campus: nerf basketball, ping-pong tables, video game consoles, model rockets, and super soakers.

  3. Ideal location for geeks by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These sorts of locations are ideal for geek workers. If you're running a design or marketing agency, being out of town is going to really hurt your company, but for the sort of people Google hires, this is ideal. Your money goes a lot further out of town, so you can spend more on gadgets, and since they're indoor types anyway, it's ideal. Perhaps more tech companies should be getting out of the smoke and letting their workers live in more idyllic locations. I certainly appreciate being out in the sticks and getting less distractions.

  4. Re:eh? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did i spy geeks and sports in the same sentence?

    Not that we windows users don't enjoy living dangerously.


    Using Windows isn't sport, it's masochism.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  5. Google moves to The Dalles by mctk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Locals wonder about "internet" phenomenon.

    --
    Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
  6. Expect more of this by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is going to be The Next Big Thing. Such "Rural Sourcing" has been going on somewhat quietly for a while now and is giving offshoring your workforce a serious run for its money.

    There's even a company named (imagine that) "Rural Sourcing, Inc." that is consulting companies on how they can open up call centers, technology centers, etc. in economically depressed or extremely rural areas of the U.S.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  7. 45 minutes?!? by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you drive 120 miles an hour, maybe. It's at mile marker 82 or so. Do the math.

  8. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you compare it to the salary surveys that seem to go around, no, it doesn't look anything magical. If you compare it to reality, however, then $60,000 is pretty respectable when you consider all the benefits they get.

    I'm thinking that Google is pulling the old 'provide everything at work, and make work so "fun" that they'll stay all hours' trick. This works for a while, but when your employees start getting girlfriends and kids, it kinda goes to pot. Still, as previous news stories here have shown us, married, old staff are not as innovative or useful as young hopefuls, so perhaps this plan isn't so bad on Google's part after all.

    Heck, I know coders who make $30,000 a year in major metropolitan areas without Googlesque benefits. Google are just placing themselves above the average in an increasingly popular trend.. but they're no Microsoft, that's for sure.

  9. why? by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting
    With all the outdoor sports (windsurfing, hiking, mountain biking, skiing) in the area, sports-minded geeks should be flocking to apply for a job at the new facility

    The Yahoo story I read (several days ago) said that maybe 100 jobs would be created. Not a lot, folks...and that's 100 jobs total. Not "100 techie jobs"...100 -jobs-.

    Those jobs won't be doing sexy things. The only reason you put a facility in the middle of nowhere is because it's cheap in terms of space. Skilled labor is virtually nonexistant and relocation expensive.

    Google strikes me as being like the Army. They talk a great talk(in Google's case, innovation, exciting workplace, etc; in the Army's, it's "defending freedom" and "jobs skills") and show you eye candy galore, and when you actually get in, you spend your time wading in shit (metaphorically in Google's case).

    Nevermind the locals are going to hate you because you're making twice what they are and you're "some city kid", etc. Experience has told me, "trickle down" is never popular until you forcibly remind people (for example, I've heard of companies exchanging cash to silver dollars for employees to use in the local town, to demonstrate to the community just how much of their income comes from employees).

    No thanks, I'll pass.

  10. Hopefully desks, not servers by afabbro · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Putting lots of people in the Dalles makes sense. Putting lots of computer doesn't. Let's see:
    • In the Columbia river flood plain
    • In an earthquake zone
    • Not far from the Umatilla chemical weapons depot
    • And the big one: we're overdue for the every-300-year Cascadian subduction zone tsunami event, which will roll right up the Columbia river. And there are dams both West and East of the Dalles...

    I'm just saying...not where I'd put a data center. Many of the major data centers in Portland have moved elsewhere in the last 20 years for reasons such as this. (Yes, there are still some around...I work at one).

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  11. Additional information for slashdotters by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 4, Informative

    We're all conservative rednecks out here and it's always windy, and we get snowstorms and ice storms.

  12. Silicon Valley Part Deux? by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When many of the pioneers of "the Valley" first set up shop, they were building on cheap farmland far away from the sky-high rents of San Francisco, and even Palo Alto. Look at a map of a place like Cupertino in the 60s...you will be blown away...nothing but farms. Some tech companies looked for cheap digs...and look at things now.

  13. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by nybble_me · · Score: 4, Funny

    **AVERAGE** That means that 1/2 of their people make more than $60,000/year. I'm sure they have receptionists and janitors making way less.

    --

    reenigne
  14. Little-known irrelevant fact by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Dalles was a point along the oregon trail.

    CmdrTaco has cholera.

    Found 32 pounds of food.

    You broke a wagon tongue.

    Ah, those were the good old days.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  15. Re:Google building a new complex... by XorNand · · Score: 5, Informative

    Probably not since that's what they call their existing complex.

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
  16. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by plalonde2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This idea that rural sourcing is good for employees is a fallacy.

    An anectode: a friend of mine was offered two faculty positions, one in a rural setting and one in a large city. The salary was a little higher in the large city. When the rural school argued "but homes here cost only $100k, but they cost $300k in the city" my friend answered: "then it's clear, I must accept the position in the city". "But why?" "Because in 20 years I'll have a $300k home, while in your town I'll be worth $100k plus some gadgets".

    If you can, spend your young years paying into a more expensive home, even (especially?) at some hardship to yourself. Your future self will have a substantially higher net worth in 10 years when comes time to relocate. Then you can go either to the country, or to an expensive city. But you can pretty much *never* move to the city from the country without starting another deep mortgage later in life.