Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Red Hat Promises A More Vibrant Fedora

Posted by timothy on from the striking-a-balance dept.

loki99 points out a CNET story about the direction Red Hat's development has taken (and changes in the wind), writing "Michael Tiemann, vice president of Red Hat, admits that after exclusively concentrating on Red Hat Enterprise Linux in recent years, they left those 'early adopters' behind. 'It insulted some of our best supporters. But worse, we lost our opportunity to do customer-driven innovation.' Tiemann said." The recent Boston FUDcon (mentioned in the linked article) is one example of how the company wants to revitalize non-corporate interest.

5 of 548 comments (clear)

  1. VIbrant Fedora? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our bright magenta overlords of haberdashery.

  2. VIbrant Fedora, with a capital "VI" ?? by Doppler00 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope this doesn't mean it will be based entirely on the user interface of vi.

    1. Re:VIbrant Fedora, with a capital "VI" ?? by dubbreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      What, you would prefer EMACSparkling Fedora?

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  3. Re:Questions for Red Hat customers... by xenocide2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been happier then hell with it

    Well, gee. Can't come up with a better desciption than "Hey, its better than living in a lake of fire with sharp sticks shoved up ones anus.!" ;-)

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  4. Re:What is vibrant about it? by cowbutt · · Score: 4, Funny
    With RH9, at least I didn't have to risk a system overhaul every couple of months. Updates came out regularly, and I could upgrade RPMs as needed or required.

    Updates for FC1 are still available from Fedora Legacy. Alternatively, consider the Free RHEL rebuilds such as Centos or Whitebox, which promise to have updates available for as long as RHEL does (2010, as it stands at the moment).