Sixth Bioinformatics Open Source Conference
Shipud writes "The sixth Bioinformatics Open Source Conference
will take place this June in Detroit, MI.
Open source licensed software has proven to be the most popular and useful
for bioinformatics research.
This includes the EMBOSS suite for sequence
analysis, the Biopython;
Bioperl, and Biojava
collaborativelty constructed toolboxes; the ubiquitous
RasMol and
PyMol molecular visualization
tools, and more, much more.
Here is
one opinion as to why open source and collaborative development
have been such a raging success even at big pharma, despite the apparent IP hurdles."
Bio-VB
Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
Many of these open-source projects are hosted at bioinformatics.org. The site also contains great information in the FAQ such as definitions of bioinformatics, colleges and universities that offer programs, both undergraduate and graduate level, in bioinformatics, and discussion of skills required or suggested for the area of study.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever.
i like how the submitter listed all those off, and failed to mention bioruby. thanks
- tristan
www.randomfactory.com/ distribute collections of Biotech packages prebuilt for Linux.
C'mon laugh! It's funny!
The knoppix LiveCD - now fortified with extra bioinformatics! It's a BLAST.
http://bioknoppix.hpcf.upr.edu/
Two other wonderful, and interrelated, open source packages are R, the open source statistical software project, and Biocondutor , basically a set of R functions.
I think the reason that the press (and i include bloggers in this realm) use IP to refer to Intellectual Property (as if the human genome is for sale) is that the press kowtows to lawyers such as those who fill the legislative branches.
...
Meanwhile, in the real world, IP still stands for Internet Protocol and we're still waiting for IPv6
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
Please overlook my seemingly sarcastic title, but in all seriousness, can any of you please let me know if you're solely in the field of "bioinformatics" and if you are, how happy are you? To many of us, gratification is measured in so many different ways---albeit monetarily or academically such as by the amount of publications, tenure, or student satisfaction---so please clarify how you view your current position's gratification. My impression with this whole "bioinformatics" craze is that there is little in the way of career paths for pure _bioinformaticians_. Rather, researchers tend to learn a few bioinformatics tools here and there when they need to, but at the end of the day, they're still just biologists, chemists, clinical scientist, etc. Am I wrong?
Linux at home