Slashdot Mirror


Linux In Robots, Windows in Handhelds

savuporo writes "Robots.net is reporting that Linux-based robots are far more common than Windows-based robotics. Especially various Asian robot builders are increasingly selecting Linux and other open-source software as a basis for robot products and research. Linux is also gaining ground in other embedded applications like PDAs and mobile phones." That said, prostoalex writes "50% of all the PDAs sold in 2003 had Palm OS, while Windows family accounted for 37.7% of PDA market. In 2004 Microsoft is the leader of handheld OS market with 43% market share, followed by Palm OS with 36.3%."

12 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure which OS I should use for my handheld robot.

  2. 4 out of 5 robots prefer Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    over CP/M.

    By the way, has Commodore released the C=64 CP/M cartridge yet? All my valuable early 80s software is orphaned!

  3. gives a whole new meaning to by essreenim · · Score: 5, Funny
    exec kill proc

  4. Windows robots are dangerous! by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Creators of robots use Linux to control them because robots would be far too dangerous when infected with spyware.

    Imagine you forget to patch your mobile, appendage-laden Windows-running robot, connect it to the Internet and suddenly it wakes you up in the middle of the night with a mischievous look on its face.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  5. Microsoft laws of Robotics: by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe it's because of the MLoR:

    First Law:

    A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm, unless it interferes with making a profit.

    Second Law:

    A robot must obey orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law, or interferes with making a profit.

    Third Law:

    A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law, or interferes with making a profit.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  6. Not really a surprise by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because we all know how great of a memory and process manager Windows is.

    If Windows managed the memory of a robot, then the robot would truly have shit for brains.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  7. Re:Linux best in the growing market by TIMxPx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Loading a Microsoft product into a robotic device would be like using it to operate my car, and i wouldn't recommend that. It would crash at least once per day, and i'd have to restart the car several times on any significant journey.

    Seriously though, i can envision a world in which M$ software is installed into every robotic device, a world with lawns half-mowed, floors half-vacuumed, and hackers running out of coke while programming because their robotic butlers have had to reboot 4 times between the refrigerator and the basement.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world: That averages about 660,000,000 of each kind.
  8. isn't it obvious? by MiKM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lindows, of course.

  9. Makes sense by bkhl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux for vital production use, Windows for useless toys.

    1. Re:Makes sense by karnal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got a car with power windows.

      Does that make you even more scared?

      --
      Karnal
  10. Re:Linux best in the growing market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    >> would ANY robot run windows?

    Because Windows has a spell checker that would allow the robot to post on /. without appearing an illiterate asshole - unlike your good self.

  11. Re:You forgot one... by aurb · · Score: 2, Funny

    A robot may not harm or arrest any executive or employee of Microsoft Corporation.

    ...unless it interferes with making a profit.